1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
0 |
7 |
3 |
0 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri |
0 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mis takes a
3-0 lead with 5.10 left in the 1st half with a 39 yd fg. Setup by ou int. Mis has already missed 2 fg's and stopped |
|
|
|
ou on a 4th
and goal from the 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mis ties the
game at 10 with 8.00 left in the 3rd on a 21 yd draw play. A 37 yd dbp set it up, their 3rd long pass
of the day. |
|
|
|
incredibly
Mis takes the lead with only 2.20 left in the game, again a long pass and a B
run. They miss the xp, and lead 16-10. |
|
|
|
A long punt
return help set it up, as OU thought they were fixing to pin Mis deep. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OU just could
not put together their option game. |
Oklahoma |
|
Missouri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The goalline
stand by Mis in the 1st qtr looms |
|
10 |
SCORE |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
large in the
end. Mis was extremely lucky with |
|
12 |
1ST DOWNS |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dropback
passes today, which ultimately won the |
244 |
TOTAL YDS |
351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
game, setting up 2 scores. |
|
|
59 |
RUSH ATT |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
RUSH YDS |
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
RUSH AVG |
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
PASS ATT |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PASS COMP |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
PASS YDS |
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PENALTIES |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PEN YDS |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richmond |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (OH) |
7 |
14 |
7 |
7 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richmond |
|
Miami (OH) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
SCORE |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
TOTAL YDS |
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
RUSH ATT |
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
RUSH YDS |
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
RUSH AVG |
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
PASS ATT |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
PASS COMP |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
PASS YDS |
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
PEN YDS |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSU |
7 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
3 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 yd punt
return for td by lsu with 4.20 left in the half puts the tigers up 14-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lsu has had 2
turnovers in the red zone this quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mich opens up
the offense a bit in the 4th and scores on a 26 yd qr to bring it to 21-13
lsu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mich hits a
44 yd dbp and eventually gets to the lsu 3, but throws and inc blp on 4th and
goal and loses the game |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSU really has a nice
offense and is quite |
|
LSU |
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
formidable on
the line plunge/option |
|
|
21 |
SCORE |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qr
attack. LSU outplayed Mich, who was
stacked |
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
agains the
tiger run game all day. Mich is not |
|
259 |
TOTAL YDS |
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
far from
getting a chance to tie this one up. |
|
60 |
RUSH ATT |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I only wonder
what would have happened in |
|
225 |
RUSH YDS |
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this one had
they turned to the pass earlier, as |
|
3.8 |
RUSH AVG |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
their QR is
lethal and LSU doesn't stop the pass. |
9 |
PASS ATT |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PASS COMP |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PASS YDS |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-6 |
YDS LOST |
-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona St |
7 |
16 |
7 |
7 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas |
10 |
14 |
14 |
21 |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
asu takes a
7-3 lead with a 54 yd td pass on the dropback on 3rd and 14, kansas was in
the ppl, but could not stop it |
|
|
|
|
on the very
next scrimmage play, kansas throws a dropback for 86 yds and a td, 10-7
jayhawks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
the
ballhawking jayhawks get an int and return it to the 3, afterward taking
their 2nd qtr lead to 24 to 14. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona St |
|
Kansas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
SCORE |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479 |
TOTAL YDS |
503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
RUSH ATT |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
RUSH YDS |
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
RUSH AVG |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
PASS ATT |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
PASS COMP |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
PASS YDS |
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
PEN YDS |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
YDS LOST |
-18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
10 |
6 |
10 |
7 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nd first score
off texas fumble |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
texas closes
the score to 16-13 nd in the 2nd qtr with a 71 yd punt return for td, they
have 3 pr's over 30 yds already |
|
|
|
|
nd completely
dominates field position, keeping the ball on texas' end most of the qtr and
grows a 26-13 lead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
|
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the game,
ND was much more fortunate than |
33 |
SCORE |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas at recovering
fumbles. But, ND clearly |
|
24 |
1ST DOWNS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dominates the
game. Texas hangs in there well |
485 |
TOTAL YDS |
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the first
half, but that ND defense shut down |
|
65 |
RUSH ATT |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Longhorns
in the 2nd half. Also, a very good |
366 |
RUSH YDS |
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
job
offensively for the Irish in the 2nd half.
It would |
5.6 |
RUSH AVG |
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
be hard for
ANY chart to beat ND if they play like |
21 |
PASS ATT |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
they did in the 2nd half on
this one. |
|
|
13 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
PASS YDS |
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
YDS LOST |
-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temple |
14 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
7 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
penn state
scores a td on the 1st play of the 4th qtr, but misses the xp, and still
trails by 1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with 7.40 left
in the game, penn state takes their first lead of the game with an impressive
drive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 40 yds,
all runs, against a bad run defense, setup by an int of the penn state
defensive chart. 23 to 17 psu. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temple |
|
Penn State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbelievable
that Temple was even in it. In fact, |
20 |
SCORE |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSU had to
absolutely play their best down the |
|
21 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stretch to
pull it out. No way these two should |
|
358 |
TOTAL YDS |
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
play this close when
glancing at the charts. |
|
41 |
RUSH ATT |
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Astonished no fumbles
were lost. And by the |
|
111 |
RUSH YDS |
398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
low
int's. A deeper look at the charts
shows that |
2.7 |
RUSH AVG |
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temple's
passing performance against PSU's |
|
32 |
PASS ATT |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
secondary is
not very surprising, and carried |
|
18 |
PASS COMP |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Owls,
almost to a huge upset. Really in
shock |
255 |
PASS YDS |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
over the
game. In shock over PSU's poor pass |
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
performance,
as I would have thought it would |
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
have been an important
component of a big |
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State
win. Temple made it to the PSU 29 |
|
3 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before going
out on downs, and only had 2 yds |
|
12 |
PEN YDS |
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to go, with
over a minute. It REALLY could have |
2 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended with a
Temple win. |
|
|
|
-8 |
YDS LOST |
-17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA |
10 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
14 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ucla fumbles
on their first play, and neb converts to 7 pts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
later in the
1st ucla converts a neb fumble for 3 pts, very strong goalline defense by
huskers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
still in the
1st, neb extends lead to 14-3 with a 72 yd draw play, tackled right on the
goalline |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turnovers
almost beat NU today, one of their |
|
UCLA |
|
Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
potential
problems areas. But, the defense |
|
20 |
SCORE |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
played
outstanding and made tons of plays |
|
18 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bailing out NU over and
over again. They |
|
448 |
TOTAL YDS |
454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
came up with a
big stop that led to UCLA |
|
56 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
settling for 3
in the 1st. UCLA played well, and |
|
264 |
RUSH YDS |
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is impressive
in several ways. Their potent |
|
4.7 |
RUSH AVG |
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QR did do
well. Somehow NU's offense finds |
|
22 |
PASS ATT |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ways to get it
done. It was a really good game, |
9 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but the finish
was exceptional. UCLA rolled a 53 |
192 |
PASS YDS |
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yd dbp
completion, but NU had a -5 yd result. |
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That alone
saved a td. All this was with only |
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
one minute
left in the game. UCLA scored on each |
4 |
TURNOVERS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of their
plays, but NU stopped em with their defensive |
5 |
PENALTIES |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rolls each
time. Then, on 4th and goal from the
1, |
38 |
PEN YDS |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA gave up
their running efforts and tried a BLP, |
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using that
very efficient play in hopes of having their |
-8 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QR come up,
bringing a sure td. That happened, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but the Husker
defense once again came through, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and befitting
of a day they bailed out the team all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
day, NU rolled
a PPS and the ol' black box, for the win! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
6 |
7 |
14 |
10 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulane |
0 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tulane closes
to 13-6 with a 15 yd td pass on 3rd and 8, missed the xp, setup by int and 26
yd ret. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
with 3:20 left
in the 1st half, tulane strikes with a 27 yd dbp for a td, 13 all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
usc
dominates the first half with unstoppable offense, but then they stop
themselves with turnovers and tulane makes |
|
|
|
|
some plays to
get back in it, tulane is not bad. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sc
starts off the 2nd half with a defensive stop, then a 3 yd td pass to lead
20-13, the strong QR resurges |
|
|
|
|
|
for usc for
the first time since the 1st qtr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
usc converts
a fumble, moving the chains several times and kicking a 29 yd fg, to lead now
30-13, half-way thru 4th. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The USC
offense regained their early form in the |
USC |
|
Tulane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd half and
ran away with it. Tulane had some |
37 |
SCORE |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd half
fumbling problems and could not make |
32 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enough plays,
as they did early on. This SC offense |
539 |
TOTAL YDS |
380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is pretty
awesome. |
|
|
|
39 |
RUSH ATT |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
RUSH YDS |
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
RUSH AVG |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
PASS ATT |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
PASS COMP |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
PASS YDS |
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
0 |
7 |
17 |
3 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent State |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bama goes up
7 zip with a 26 yd option, they have laid low until now, and explode with a
string of runs and good qrs, KS earlier missed a very short fga. |
ala explodes
on ks in the 3rd, on both sides of the ball, the bama D INTd 3 passes off
their def chart. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
|
Kent State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bama is just a
strong team. Nice option and QR |
27 |
SCORE |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
game from them
today. KS really doesn't have |
|
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the defense to
hold that down all day. Although |
302 |
TOTAL YDS |
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KS moved the
ball, the Alabama defense came up |
50 |
RUSH ATT |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with good
plays on every one of KS's possessions. |
262 |
RUSH YDS |
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ala had INT
problems offensively early. KS did |
|
5.2 |
RUSH AVG |
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get to Bama
via the line plunge, a weaker part |
|
11 |
PASS ATT |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of the Tide's
defense. |
|
|
|
2 |
PASS COMP |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PASS YDS |
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
14 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
13 |
7 |
13 |
10 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 78 yd td run
breaks the ice for osu, who still trail after missing the pat, 7-6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 101 yd kor
by osu again brings them to within 1, 14 to 13 in the 1st still, vol offense
doing real well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenn gets a 5
yd qr for a td right before ht, they got a 25 yd dbp, and then an sop, nice
job, 21-20 vols. |
|
|
|
|
|
osu opens the
3rd with a 39 yd option for a td,
missing another xp, 26-21 osu, kor and bad vol coverage setup. |
|
|
|
|
|
an 86 yd kor
for a td extends osu's lead to 40-24 early 4th. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenn gets a 28
yd td pass on 4th and 1 to bring it to 40-31 osu, so it ain't over yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenn ought to
win some games. OSU was |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
just too much
for them overall. OSU is amazing |
Tennessee |
|
Ohio State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on their
returns. Tenn does a great job of
moving |
31 |
SCORE |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the
chains. They are like the early
version of |
|
24 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the late 90's
Purdue charts. Tenn was ultra |
|
435 |
TOTAL YDS |
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clean in their
game. This one was higher |
|
60 |
RUSH ATT |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scoring than I
expected, and OSU needs to be |
|
262 |
RUSH YDS |
360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thankful for 2
kor for tds. I love OSU's power |
|
4.4 |
RUSH AVG |
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
football. |
|
|
|
|
25 |
PASS ATT |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PASS COMP |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
PASS YDS |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PEN YDS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-24 |
YDS LOST |
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
7 |
0 |
9 |
0 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston |
10 |
10 |
0 |
13 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
houston takes
a 7 zip lead early with a 26 yd td dbp on 3rd and 6, following state's fumble
on their first play. |
|
|
|
|
|
a couple of
minutes later, a wolfpack int turns into 3 for houston, 10 zip. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 51 yd int
ret put the cougs up 17 to 7, start of 2nd, off hu def chart. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a houston fg
at the horn puts hu up 20-7 at the half, also off a hu drawn int. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
houston takes
a 27-16 lead early 4th with a 4 yd QT for a td, they have hit 3 long dbps
today. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 65 yd int
ret puts hu up 33 to 16. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was the ints
that did it to State, but most of |
|
NC State |
|
Houston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
those were off
the HU defense. Houston only |
|
16 |
SCORE |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
had 7 pts not
off ints. Fumbles hurt Houston |
|
21 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
though. State moved the ball better most of the |
394 |
TOTAL YDS |
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
day, the
Cougers were hardly shabby. |
|
59 |
RUSH ATT |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307 |
RUSH YDS |
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
RUSH AVG |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
PASS ATT |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
PASS YDS |
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
TURNOVERS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PEN YDS |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Tech |
3 |
10 |
7 |
13 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland |
0 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Tech |
|
Maryland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
SCORE |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
TOTAL YDS |
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
RUSH ATT |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
RUSH YDS |
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
RUSH AVG |
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
PASS ATT |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PASS COMP |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
PASS YDS |
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
PEN YDS |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
week 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
7 |
0 |
14 |
7 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ou gave much
a short field the entire 2nd qtr, but mich only got 3 out of it all, mich
missed 2 fga's in that time and |
|
|
|
|
had to punt
without fga a couple of times, solid ou defense stopped mich, plus an off 15
cost mich a td pass. |
|
|
|
|
|
early 3rd a 47
yd option puts ou ahead 14-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ou goes up
21-3 with a 5 yd qr, they got the short field after a mich int and long int
return, mich has missed 3 fga's so far. |
|
|
|
|
ou extends
lead to 28-3 early 4th, short field after punt and return, and they do what
mich has not done all day, cap on it, |
|
|
|
another B
option was basically the drive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very defensive
game as these two cancel |
|
Michigan |
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
each other out
most of the day. The OU defense |
3 |
SCORE |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
really shut
down Mich, and eventually the Sooners |
8 |
1ST DOWNS |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hit an option
here and there, although Mich did |
231 |
TOTAL YDS |
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a very good
job of stopping the run. Mich gave |
|
47 |
RUSH ATT |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
away many opps
for scoring, especially in the 1st |
162 |
RUSH YDS |
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
half, but most
of those were opps taken away from |
3.4 |
RUSH AVG |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
them by
OU. The Mich D could not come up with |
15 |
PASS ATT |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
those stops on
OU in the 2nd half. |
|
|
5 |
PASS COMP |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
PASS YDS |
-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
PEN YDS |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-22 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
0 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
3 |
14 |
0 |
10 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nd goes up 3-0
with 2 min left in the 1st via neb fumble. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nd hits a 33
yd td pass with only :10 left in the 1st half after both teams trade fumbles,
17-3 nd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
neb cuts it to
17-10 with a 2 yd qt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More of what
was expected in the '73 tourney. |
|
Nebraska |
|
Notre Dame |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ND had many
more longer runs and Neb could |
|
10 |
SCORE |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not throw
against the Irish D. ND was sloppy |
|
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with fumbles
and that could have hurt them more. |
266 |
TOTAL YDS |
369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ND defense
controlled the game. |
|
50 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
RUSH YDS |
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
RUSH AVG |
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
PASS ATT |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PASS COMP |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
PASS YDS |
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
PEN YDS |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston |
0 |
20 |
6 |
7 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
0 |
0 |
14 |
21 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 99 yd int
ret for a td (missed xp) puts houston up 20-0 on the last play of the first
half, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the
cougers have also recorded a 15 td fumble ret for a td, both teams getting
chances, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bama several
times inside the couger 35. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ala comes back
in the 3rd to close it to 20-14, one of those tds a pass off houston defense
( ). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
houston
answers with a 3rd qtr td of their own, but missed their 2nd xp, 26-14
cougers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bama cuts it
to 26-21 half way thru 4th with a 74 yd option for a td. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 7 yd qr off
a blp puts bama finally ahead with :40 left in the game, 35-33. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Big play
passes down the stretch overcame |
|
Houston |
|
Alabama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int problems
for Bama. The 2 missed PATs killed |
33 |
SCORE |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston. |
|
|
|
|
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286 |
TOTAL YDS |
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
RUSH ATT |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
RUSH YDS |
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
RUSH AVG |
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PASS ATT |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PASS COMP |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
PASS YDS |
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PEN YDS |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (OH) |
7 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona St |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with 7:20 to
go in the game, ASU just won't go away.
First, Miami black boxed a 40 yd dbp out of the B defense! |
|
|
|
|
then, ASU got
a 43 yd gain from a QT, to the 5, another QT followed, but they got a 5 yd td
run, to make it 17-14. |
|
|
|
|
ASU drives
down the field, and, with :40 to go in the game, on the Miami 8 yd line, a
BLP gets a QR, which is |
|
|
|
|
|
what ASU
wanted, but the result is F+2, and ASU loses the ball, … heartbreaking for
them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (OH) |
|
Arizona St |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It actually
turned out to be a whale of a game. |
|
17 |
SCORE |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASU would not
give this one up, and the Redhawks |
25 |
1ST DOWNS |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
had to make a
bunch of defensive plays in the end. |
424 |
TOTAL YDS |
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before that,
ASU did stop themselves often, but |
|
65 |
RUSH ATT |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it was good in
the end, and a dramatic finish. |
|
320 |
RUSH YDS |
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
RUSH AVG |
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
PASS ATT |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PASS COMP |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
PASS YDS |
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
PEN YDS |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-7 |
YDS LOST |
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
0 |
20 |
12 |
14 |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
0 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with 2:20 to
go in the first half, USC returns an int (PS off chart) 18 yds for a td, 14-7
PSU. State has played very |
|
|
|
|
consistent
defensively and gotten a couple of big plays offensively, and edged USC here
and there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSU hits an
18 yd td pass with :30 to go in the first half, and goes up 20-7 (missed
xp). They got another |
|
|
|
|
|
big play, this
one 42 yds on a dbp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSU converts a
fumble very early 3rd to lead 26-7 (missed xp) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PS returns an
int 71 yds for a td mid 3rd, and now lead 32-7, missing their 3rd pat in a
row. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The stats tell
the story (for once). USC really moved |
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ball
better than PSU, but the INT's did in |
|
Penn State |
|
USC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC. Penalties cost both teams big plays. USC |
46 |
SCORE |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
started making
big plays on offense and had several |
18 |
1ST DOWNS |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4th down
conversions in the 2nd half, but the int's |
435 |
TOTAL YDS |
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
popped up
again. PSU had an excellent day
throwing |
34 |
RUSH ATT |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ball. |
|
|
|
|
96 |
RUSH YDS |
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
RUSH AVG |
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
PASS ATT |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
PASS COMP |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347 |
PASS YDS |
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-8 |
YDS LOST |
-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
3 |
7 |
7 |
14 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Tech |
7 |
28 |
3 |
0 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TT gets
exactly a 57 yd scr pass for td early to lead 7 zip. One of those things, 19 roll for B, blitz
added 11, |
|
|
|
|
|
and got a big
B roll. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TT
returns an int 37 yds for a td to extend lead to 28-3 mid 2nd. Horrible breakdown of turnovers for
OSU, |
|
|
|
|
|
TT capping on
them, this int off TT def chart. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OSU gets a 19
yd td pass on 4th and 6 to make it 28-10, 6:30 left in 1st half |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OSU scores on
back to back long runs to make it 38-24 TT early 4th, TT held OSU on GL stand
in the 3rd. |
|
|
|
|
|
3:10 to go, TT
having a turnover-fest, OSU just moved to 38-31 TT. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TT simply hit
on things in the 2nd when OSU was |
Ohio State |
|
Texas Tech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
making lots of
turnovers. OSU was stopped at the |
31 |
SCORE |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GL once and a couple
of other times in scoring |
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
range. OSU's chart looks like a good low scoring |
311 |
TOTAL YDS |
313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type of team,
but they continue to be involved |
|
52 |
RUSH ATT |
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with these
high scoring affairs. |
|
|
249 |
RUSH YDS |
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
RUSH AVG |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
PASS ATT |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PASS COMP |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
PASS YDS |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-18 |
YDS LOST |
-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas |
0 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSU |
0 |
6 |
0 |
10 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas |
|
LSU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 very solid
qtrs of football for LSU. |
|
|
6 |
SCORE |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
TOTAL YDS |
437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
RUSH ATT |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
RUSH YDS |
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
RUSH AVG |
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
PASS ATT |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PASS COMP |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
PASS YDS |
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-27 |
YDS LOST |
-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulane |
0 |
7 |
14 |
10 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA |
7 |
0 |
7 |
21 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After a tight
first half, Tulane scores 14 quick pts to lead 21-7 early 3rd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
one score off
UCLA fumble, then a 77 yd pr for a td. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the 4th,
Tulane gets a fumble from UCLA on their 4, but the Bruins D holds making 2
big plays |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and force
the fg from the 3, which Tulane hit exactly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then UCLA
makes it 24-21 Tulane, with an 80 yd dropback pass for a td. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA
makes an incredible comeback getting 2 tds (w/onside kick [19 roll]) in the
last 2 min of the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
game
to take a 35-31 lead with :40 left.
The first drive included several long QRs and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the 2nd drive
culminated in a 16 yd td pass via the screen, a play that has been their
enemy all day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The game was a
great game in the first half, |
|
Tulane |
|
UCLA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with a good
matchup of UCLA's offense vs. |
|
31 |
SCORE |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulane's
defense. UCLA makes a lot of
turnovers. |
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then on the
other side of the ball Tulane grinds |
291 |
TOTAL YDS |
506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
things out a
little more, while UCLA does not |
|
53 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
possess the
defense to keep them from it. Nice |
|
198 |
RUSH YDS |
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
matchup worked
out well in the first half. |
|
3.7 |
RUSH AVG |
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA had a lot
of great QRs and had popped some |
17 |
PASS ATT |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nice runs,
making up for their turnovers. Tulane |
9 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dodged Bruin
bullets early with help from turnovers |
94 |
PASS YDS |
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but hurt
themselves with penalties. In the 2nd
half, |
1 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the game broke
down a little as things got a little |
1 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crazy. Tulane quickly turned Bruin mistakes into |
2 |
TURNOVERS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
points. But, the hold to a fg by UCLA was huge, as |
12 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA had just
enough time to comeback and score |
79 |
PEN YDS |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
just
enough. The onside kick was of course
key. |
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good ball game
overall. And, that UCLA offense |
-1 |
YDS LOST |
-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with those QRs
and good running is quite tough. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
0 |
14 |
7 |
3 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The stats
basically tell it all. The Terps
scored on the |
Maryland |
|
NC State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
last play of the
game, so it wasn't quite this |
|
21 |
SCORE |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
close. State's final drive ended in a short fg to |
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
put them up 24-14, and
was indicative of the |
|
389 |
TOTAL YDS |
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
majority of
the game, in which Maryland just could |
44 |
RUSH ATT |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not stop the Pack running
attack. |
|
|
182 |
RUSH YDS |
279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
RUSH AVG |
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
PASS ATT |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
PASS COMP |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212 |
PASS YDS |
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
PEN YDS |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-5 |
YDS LOST |
-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri |
0 |
21 |
10 |
0 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richmond |
7 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri |
|
Richmond |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shocked that
it was this close, and Richmond |
|
31 |
SCORE |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
came away
empty handed 3 times inside |
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the red zone! |
|
|
|
|
403 |
TOTAL YDS |
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
RUSH ATT |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312 |
RUSH YDS |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
RUSH AVG |
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
PASS ATT |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PASS COMP |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
PASS YDS |
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
PEN YDS |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-8 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
7 |
20 |
14 |
7 |
48.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temple |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
Temple |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
SCORE |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
1ST DOWNS |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523 |
TOTAL YDS |
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
RUSH ATT |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510 |
RUSH YDS |
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
RUSH AVG |
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PASS ATT |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS YDS |
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent State |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
0 |
10 |
7 |
10 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent State |
|
Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was a
really good game and closer than the final. |
7 |
SCORE |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent St seems
to make a good game out of things. |
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They are
pretty decent in the middle with Lambert. |
298 |
TOTAL YDS |
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
RUSH ATT |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
RUSH YDS |
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
RUSH AVG |
5.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
PASS ATT |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
PASS YDS |
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PEN YDS |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-11 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Week 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSU |
0 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
14 |
10 |
3 |
0 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 77 yd td run
gets things started for ou |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the tigers
first score was a 67 yd td run. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a
horrible break for LSU as OU gets a 60 yd td screen pass on the last play
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the first
half, a (TD) on LSU's def chart |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its good to
see OU play right. LSU did not at all
play |
LSU |
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bad, but this
is how things will be when OU plays |
10 |
SCORE |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
like they
can. This is the OU team we have been |
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wanting to see,
this week and last. Just a real |
|
293 |
TOTAL YDS |
484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
solid game,
running the option and defensively. |
56 |
RUSH ATT |
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSU does not
match up well, as they are weaker |
266 |
RUSH YDS |
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vs the option than inside
runs. |
|
|
4.8 |
RUSH AVG |
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PASS ATT |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PASS COMP |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
PASS YDS |
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PEN YDS |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-14 |
YDS LOST |
-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
3 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA |
3 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
|
UCLA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure
it’s a bigger upset than the week one |
17 |
SCORE |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mizzou/OU
game, but its pretty big. UCLA played |
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
great. ND seemed off on offense all day. UCLA |
344 |
TOTAL YDS |
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
does a
terrible job with fumble recovery, but |
|
46 |
RUSH ATT |
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recovered 3 of
their own today! ND had the most |
238 |
RUSH YDS |
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
defensive problems
I've seen them have. They |
5.2 |
RUSH AVG |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
did not make
plays when they really needed them. |
16 |
PASS ATT |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Down 13-3
early in the 3rd, the Irish responded |
|
6 |
PASS COMP |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
like champs and
started working their way back |
118 |
PASS YDS |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into the
game. They got the extra 1st down or
2, |
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
made the punts
with coverage and gained a field |
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
possession
advantage. They completed a 50 yd |
1 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TD pass on a
TD result on a dropback on 3rd and 18 |
10 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to score their
first TD and make it a 3 point game. |
52 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still down in the
4th qtr 13-10, ND came back on |
2 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
another 3rd
and long with a goal to go 14 yd td pass, |
-12 |
YDS LOST |
-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to take a
17-13 lead. The game was now in the
hands |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of their
awesome defense. ND made what all
thought |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to be the
biggest stop of the game with a ( ) stop on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a UCLA B long
run, when ND was in spread defense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
versus a
counter. UCLA responded with a 36 yd
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and was in
position and had the time to make the final |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
run at this
upset. On 3rd and long, UCLA got a 9
yd QR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plus a DEF 15
to give them the ball on the ND 4. ND
followed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with 2 DEF 5
penalties and UCLA was able to get it in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from the
1. ND returned the kickoff 54 yards to
the UCLA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40, but failed
to move the ball. Incredible
game. ND has |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that great
pass defense, but still had problems with the very |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strong UCLA
QR today. Also, several QTs for UCLA
turned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into good
yardage. Strong showing for UCLA, who
has a very |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
good
offense. ND and OU have now dropped
games earlier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than
expected. This could make things
interesting. The Irish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stopped
themselves on offense most of the day, (it wasn't |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
really good
UCLA defense.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
0 |
3 |
0 |
21 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
17 |
10 |
14 |
7 |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
|
Alabama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impressive. Bama crushes State. Actually, I'd even |
24 |
SCORE |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
say it wasn't
as close as the score. |
|
|
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317 |
TOTAL YDS |
499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
RUSH ATT |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196 |
RUSH YDS |
294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
RUSH AVG |
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
PASS ATT |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
PASS YDS |
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
PEN YDS |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-3 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (OH) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas |
13 |
10 |
7 |
0 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (OH) |
|
Kansas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The box score
tells the story. Really a poor,
pathetic |
14 |
SCORE |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
game. Miami OH did not even show up. Kansas |
18 |
1ST DOWNS |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
did what they
do. |
|
|
|
301 |
TOTAL YDS |
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
RUSH ATT |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
RUSH YDS |
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
RUSH AVG |
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
PASS ATT |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS COMP |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
PASS YDS |
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-25 |
YDS LOST |
-12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
0 |
3 |
6 |
13 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulane |
0 |
10 |
3 |
3 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
|
Tulane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSU dodges a
bullet in a big way today. Tulane |
22 |
SCORE |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
really
outplayed them. Tulane picks up a FG
on the |
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
last play of
the first half. Penn State missed 2
XPs. |
302 |
TOTAL YDS |
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSU made a
late run, thanks mostly to their defense |
52 |
RUSH ATT |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coming up with
INTs. Their defense saved the game for |
193 |
RUSH YDS |
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
them in the
2nd half. Tulane made most of the
important |
3.7 |
RUSH AVG |
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plays on both
sides of the ball. In the end, things
got |
13 |
PASS ATT |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
crazy. Tulane was down 22-13, so needed 2 scores |
8 |
PASS COMP |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with about 7
minutes left. They drove the length of
the |
118 |
PASS YDS |
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
field, but had
to settle for a FG, to make it 22-16. |
2 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rest of
the game was a series of PS offensive |
4 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
miscues and
bailouts by the D. Even with just :40 |
6 |
TURNOVERS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
left in the
game, PS held Tulane on downs and got |
5 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ball back
to sit on it for the win. But, they
fumbled |
35 |
PEN YDS |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Tulane had
the ball on the PSU 18. Tulane |
1 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
threw a TD
pass! But, it was called back for a
holding |
-9 |
YDS LOST |
-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
penalty. Tulane ended up losing a fumble on a
completed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pass and loses
a game they probably should have won. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulane had the
ball 2 golden opportunities to win the game |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the last 4
minutes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINAL SCORE:
1973 Ohio State 41 / 1973 Maryland 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Ohio
State Rushing: 63-245 Passing:
6-14-151-2 Fum Lost: 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Maryland
Rushing: 49-97 Passing:
10-21-100-1 Fum Lost: 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINAL SCORE:
1973 Michigan 28 / 1973 Richmond 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Michigan
Rushing: 68-410 Passing: 2-10-5-4 Fum Lost: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Richmond
Rushing: 31-62 Passing:
10-28-129-1 Fum Lost: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINAL SCORE:
1973 Nebraska 31 / 1973 Temple 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Nebraska
Rushing: 58-348 Passing:
7-15-117-2 Fum Lost: 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Temple
Rushing: 53-142 Passing: 4-7-11-0 Fum Lost: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston |
0 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
7 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very defensive
game, both teams slanted towards |
Houston |
|
Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the run on
offense, but both Ds calling a more balanced |
14 |
SCORE |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
type of
game. Still, the Ds dominated. Houston's first |
11 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
score came off
a 50 yd INT ret. They only had one
drive |
219 |
TOTAL YDS |
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that really
looked like that strong Houston running game |
42 |
RUSH ATT |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
all day, that
one bringing the score to 17-14 in the |
125 |
RUSH YDS |
207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4th. The Cougers threw an INT that gave the
Vols |
3.0 |
RUSH AVG |
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
superb field
position for the TD that took them to their |
14 |
PASS ATT |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 point 17-7
lead. Tenn played better overall. The |
6 |
PASS COMP |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston
defense played well, but their rushing attack |
102 |
PASS YDS |
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
did not come
thru for them. |
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-8 |
YDS LOST |
-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona St |
0 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri |
7 |
6 |
10 |
0 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona St |
|
Missouri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASU doesn't
have the run defense to stop the strong |
21 |
SCORE |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mizzou running
game, and the Tigers take it to 3-0. |
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good run at it
in the 4th by ASU, but they threw an |
342 |
TOTAL YDS |
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INT with good
field position to seal it for the Tigers. |
44 |
RUSH ATT |
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
RUSH YDS |
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
RUSH AVG |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PASS ATT |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PASS COMP |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
PASS YDS |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
PEN YDS |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-4 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
10 |
7 |
7 |
13 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas picks up
a FG early off a USC fumble, then later in the 1st gets a 45 yd pr for a td. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC closes to
7-10 with a 50 yd dropback pass for td. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the most
part, this was a bad match up for USC. |
USC |
|
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They don't
stop the option. On top of that, Texas |
14 |
SCORE |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
did a good job
running their option today. Overall, |
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it was just a
matter of Texas being able to run the |
365 |
TOTAL YDS |
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
option better
vs. USC than USC is agains the Texas D. |
33 |
RUSH ATT |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC does throw
many INTs and that was revealed again |
167 |
RUSH YDS |
420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
today. Lots of good QR yardage for USC. But, lots of |
5.1 |
RUSH AVG |
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B yardage for
Texas. A fun game to watch the
contrasting |
36 |
PASS ATT |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
styles. The Texas offense really took over. Also, field |
15 |
PASS COMP |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
position was
largely in favor of the Horns, because of |
212 |
PASS YDS |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the rather
weak punting game for SC, combined with |
5 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a very good
Texas punt return. That actually
meant |
2 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more to this
one than all the Trojan INTs. |
|
7 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
PEN YDS |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-14 |
YDS LOST |
-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Tech |
0 |
0 |
7 |
6 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent State |
7 |
14 |
14 |
0 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which team is
2-0 and which one was 0-2? 2 TT |
Texas Tech |
|
Kent State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fumbles turn
into 14 easy points for KS, who returned |
13 |
SCORE |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
one for 16 yds
and a TD, the other took only a short |
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drive to
convert. At the end of the first half,
TT left |
324 |
TOTAL YDS |
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KS at midfield
with :20 to go. KS hit a TD on the
dropback |
50 |
RUSH ATT |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pass, for the
21 zip halftime lead. KS was stacked
against |
230 |
RUSH YDS |
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the option
running game and had enough to slow them |
4.6 |
RUSH AVG |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
down. But, the key early on was the TT
fumbles. They |
13 |
PASS ATT |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recovered
probably 5 or 6 of their own fumbles today! |
8 |
PASS COMP |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KS threw the
dropback pass very well. TT
played |
94 |
PASS YDS |
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
even with KS
in the 2nd half, as their losing fumbles |
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
let
up. |
|
|
|
|
4 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PENALTIES |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
PEN YDS |
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Week 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
0 |
9 |
0 |
27 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona St |
10 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASU returns an
INT 66 yards for a TD to open the scoring, 7 zip. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funny. ASU actually handled OU like they were |
Oklahoma |
|
Arizona St |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nothing, for 3
qtrs. OU seems to lull for long |
|
36 |
SCORE |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
periods of
time offensively. But, when they show |
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
up, its
impressive. ASU ripped several very
long |
495 |
TOTAL YDS |
268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
runs, and was close to
busting this game open |
|
79 |
RUSH ATT |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
their way, but
had some turnovers in OU territory. |
466 |
RUSH YDS |
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OU only passed
once in the 2nd half. |
|
|
5.9 |
RUSH AVG |
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OU had 10 runs
of 10+ yds in the 4th qtr, 8 of them |
6 |
PASS ATT |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for 20+ yds. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
PASS COMP |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
PASS YDS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
PENALTIES |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
PEN YDS |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
14 |
17 |
3 |
3 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
6 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
|
USC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of
things happening in this one, which was a lot |
37 |
SCORE |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of fun. ND played really well offensively today,
better |
20 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than
normal. But, USC does not play strong
run |
390 |
TOTAL YDS |
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
defense. ND recovered 7 of their own fumbles |
|
60 |
RUSH ATT |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
today!!! Woulda been a different story. Otherwise |
303 |
RUSH YDS |
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Irish
running game was fantastic. Naturally,
the |
5.1 |
RUSH AVG |
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ND defense was
great as always, and USC would |
19 |
PASS ATT |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
have put a lot
more points on the board against |
9 |
PASS COMP |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an even average
defense. SC missed 2 PATs. |
|
91 |
PASS YDS |
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC shows how
strong their offense is, hanging |
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in this one
for until the very end. USC played it |
3 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
safe on 3rd
and long today, fearful of the BD PPL |
3 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INT
ability. That worked very well. |
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-4 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
0 |
14 |
14 |
7 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Tech |
7 |
13 |
7 |
6 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ala 95 yd kor
for td makes it 14-13 2nd qtr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tt goes up
27-14 early 3rd with 73 yd int ret for td, int off ala chart |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What a ball
game. It takes everything Bama has |
Alabama |
|
Texas Tech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to end up with
the W here. Interesting that the |
|
35 |
SCORE |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chart analysis
had both teams running the same |
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
customized
option offense at each other.
Alabama's |
345 |
TOTAL YDS |
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
problem was
that they aren't good enough against |
55 |
RUSH ATT |
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the run to
defend TT consistently. To add to
that, |
231 |
RUSH YDS |
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TT does a pretty
decent job against the option. |
4.2 |
RUSH AVG |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama passes
the ball well, and is much better |
14 |
PASS ATT |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
overall on
special teams. TT hit some huge
passes |
6 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
very late in
the game. But, the passing and special |
114 |
PASS YDS |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
teams play by
Bama may have been the thing that |
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
put them over
today. It was a great back and
forth |
3 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
game with a
great ending. TT drove in the last
minute |
4 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hitting on a
4th and 15 a 19 yd pass completion that |
5 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
was a fumble, but
recovered by TT. Then, TT got |
42 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a long completion and
a DEF PI. They ended up |
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the 3 yard
line with :20 left in the game, down |
0 |
YDS LOST |
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35-27. TT completed a BLP for the TD. They tried |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
another BLP on
the 2 pt try, but the QB lost 3 yards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Bama
avoids the same fate as recent #1's. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri |
0 |
0 |
14 |
7 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (OH) |
0 |
3 |
0 |
9 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri |
|
Miami (OH) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mizzou is
apparently for real. They play a solid
game |
21 |
SCORE |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
today and win
with what they do well, big plays. |
10 |
1ST DOWNS |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
that are only a couple of drives, filled |
208 |
TOTAL YDS |
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with 20+ yd
runs and passes, and one long INT return |
43 |
RUSH ATT |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for a TD. The Miami offense really let them down |
110 |
RUSH YDS |
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
today. Mizzou won the field position battle in a
big |
2.6 |
RUSH AVG |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
way. Miami did poorly once they got to about the |
15 |
PASS ATT |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tiger 30 yard line, all day. |
|
|
6 |
PASS COMP |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
PASS YDS |
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-5 |
YDS LOST |
-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
0 |
3 |
14 |
21 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
13 |
3 |
7 |
10 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the Texas
ground game grind to a halt by the PS defense, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas
scores in other ways, getting back into the game with TDs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on punt
returns of 80 and 94 yards in the 2nd half.
They also get |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
another 2nd
half TD via a 9 yd QR. PS fumbles
halfway thru the 4th |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
giving the
ball to Texas in good field position, but Texas fumbles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it right back
to them on the next play and PS returns that 71 yards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for a TD, to
now lead 33-24. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas closes
to 33-31, but fails to recover the onside kick. PS fumbles, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as they are
trying to run out the clock, and Texas takes over at midfield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with 1:20 left
in the game. Texas then runs an option
for 47 yards, and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scores the go
ahead TD with :30 left, on another option after PS stuffed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a couple of
inside runs. PS completes a long pass
(42 yds) to get to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Longhorn
28, but throw an inc pass on the game's last play. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PS really did
what they needed to do to win the |
Texas |
|
Penn State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
game, stuff
the Texas option attack. But, as the |
38 |
SCORE |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
notes say,
Texas found other ways to score. Both |
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
teams were
effective with their punt returns.
Texas |
317 |
TOTAL YDS |
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
also got some
important gains via the QR when the |
63 |
RUSH ATT |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
running game put them in
bad situations. |
|
252 |
RUSH YDS |
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
RUSH AVG |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PASS ATT |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
PASS YDS |
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PEN YDS |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-5 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent State |
0 |
13 |
6 |
7 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
13 |
3 |
0 |
13 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first qtr
went mostly like expected, OSU playing |
Kent State |
|
Ohio State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
their game and
taking care of KS. But, things
changed. |
26 |
SCORE |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KS made tons
of plays in this game, always coming |
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
up with the
big 3rd down and making several long |
346 |
TOTAL YDS |
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
passes and
runs. The 2nd half turned into a great
back |
41 |
RUSH ATT |
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and forth
game. Every time I thought the other
team |
176 |
RUSH YDS |
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
would not come
back, … back they came! KS could |
4.3 |
RUSH AVG |
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not have played much
better. OSU had some big |
29 |
PASS ATT |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QRs down the
stretch and also completed a huge 36 |
11 |
PASS COMP |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yd dropback to
go up 23-19 in the 4th. Both teams |
183 |
PASS YDS |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
missed a
couple of PATs. KS came back with back
to |
4 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
back long runs
and took the lead 26-23, with about |
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 minutes to
go. Then, it was vintage Ohio State
power |
5 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
football all
the way, for the winning TD. The
Buckeye |
6 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
defense shuts
down the KS passing efforts in the last |
45 |
PEN YDS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
moments of the
game for the win. |
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-13 |
YDS LOST |
-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas |
7 |
6 |
7 |
0 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
3 |
7 |
0 |
14 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Int leads to
quick 3 for Mich. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Back to back
screens for 33 and 34 yds puts 7 on the board for Kansas, 7-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An int sets up
a Kansas TD, missed xp, 13-3 Jayhawks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mich power
runs down the field and then hits a 34 yd dbp for a td, 13-10 Kan, 1 to go in
the half. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Ballhawks
do their thing in the 3rd with ints to stop Mich. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the 4th,
Mich gets a couple of B runs and score on a 16 yd run to make it 20-17 Kan,
early 4th. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mich goes 80
yds in 4 min and takes the lead with only :20 left with a 1 yd td plunge. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
drive was 15 plays long, only including one pass. And a DEF 15. and DEF 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas |
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
SCORE |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326 |
TOTAL YDS |
379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
RUSH ATT |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
RUSH YDS |
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
RUSH AVG |
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
PASS ATT |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
PASS YDS |
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
PEN YDS |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-3 |
YDS LOST |
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulane |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
7 |
13 |
0 |
9 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulane |
1st half |
Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SCORE |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
1ST DOWNS |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
TOTAL YDS |
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
RUSH ATT |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
RUSH YDS |
247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
RUSH AVG |
6.861111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PASS ATT |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
PASS COMP |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
PASS YDS |
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
PENALTIES |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PEN YDS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulane |
|
Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SCORE |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
1ST DOWNS |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
TOTAL YDS |
507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
RUSH ATT |
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
RUSH YDS |
361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
RUSH AVG |
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
PASS ATT |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
PASS COMP |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS YDS |
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
PEN YDS |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINAL SCORE:
1973 Maryland 10 / 1973 Houston 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Maryland
Rushing: 53-144 Passing:
8-14-126-1 Fum Lost: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Houston
Rushing: 54-301 Passing:
8-19-184-2 Fum Lost: 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINAL SCORE:
1973 Richmond 14 / 1973 LSU 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Richmond
Rushing: 46-89 Passing:
15-29-240-2 Fum Lost: 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 LSU
Rushing: 62-365 Passing:
4-12-70-3 Fum Lost: 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temple |
6 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA |
13 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temple was
actually in this one and could have |
Temple |
|
UCLA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
made a good
run at UCLA, but blew numorous |
|
16 |
SCORE |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
opportunities
in the first half, missing a short FGA |
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and turning it
over every time their defense had |
325 |
TOTAL YDS |
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
given them
good FP. UCLA plays steady as always. |
60 |
RUSH ATT |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
RUSH YDS |
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
RUSH AVG |
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
PASS ATT |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
PASS COMP |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
PASS YDS |
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PEN YDS |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-12 |
YDS LOST |
-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
0 |
7 |
6 |
7 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
3 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vols fum
opening ko but hold state to a fg, 3-0 state |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vols first
scrimmage play is an int, but state misses a 31 yd fga. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenn embarks
on an 8 min drive that ends in a 1 yd td plunge for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 7-3 lead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3rd qtr tenn
14 yd td pass, missed xp, 13-3 vols, got several DEF to help them |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.00 to go in
the game, state gets 9 yd td pass on 3rd and goal to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cut it to
13-10 tenn, setup by tenn fum and 19 yd ncsu option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at 9.50 state
ties after a def caused int, 18 yd ret, eventually with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 35 yd fg, 13-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenn retakes
the lead 20-13 with 5 yd td run, setup by state fum at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
midfield, nice
4 min drive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
state drives
to the tenn 27, but is backed up to the 34 on a sack and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
go out on
downs with .5 left |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
|
NC State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very, very
good game. Hard to believe the Vols |
20 |
SCORE |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
win it looking
at the numbers. State did a better |
19 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
job of moving
the ball, but Tenn put things together |
251 |
TOTAL YDS |
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
better. Very fun contest. |
|
|
|
50 |
RUSH ATT |
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
RUSH YDS |
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
RUSH AVG |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS ATT |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PASS COMP |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
PASS YDS |
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
PEN YDS |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Week 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas |
3 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
0 |
6 |
7 |
0 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kan converts
an ou fum into 3 late 1st |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ou converts a
kan (off chart) int and 30 yd ret into 6, missed xp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
great ou
defense holds kan to a short fg and we are tied at 6, 5:50 left in half |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ou rips a 35
yd option for a td and a 13-9 lead on 3rd and long late 3rd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas |
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OU continues to drag
offensively, but get some |
|
9 |
SCORE |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
big plays and
play great defense. Almost fumbed |
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this one
away. The D saved OU, who had a |
|
236 |
TOTAL YDS |
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stopped a TD in the 2nd. |
|
|
|
33 |
RUSH ATT |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
RUSH YDS |
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
RUSH AVG |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PASS ATT |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS COMP |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170 |
PASS YDS |
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-41 |
YDS LOST |
-10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulane |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
0 |
14 |
0 |
3 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
each team
misses a FG in the first qtr as Tulane plays well and hangs with ND. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good defense
by Tulane to stay in the game so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A def induced
int by ND leads to a 1 yd plunge and 7-0 lead for the Irish |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ND gets a 19
yd td run later in the 2nd to go up 14-0.
ND is playing extremely well offensively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
An int and 24
yd ret leads to 3 for Tul, 14-3 in the 3rd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tul holds ND
at the 1, forcing short fg for 17-3 irish lead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ND just shuts
down Tul hard all 4th to preserve the win |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulane |
|
Notre Dame |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fantastic
football game. Not real close, but
it's |
|
3 |
SCORE |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
not often that
2 solid teams play well against |
|
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
each other for
4 qtrs. ND just too strong. Tulane |
260 |
TOTAL YDS |
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
had a few
opps, but the ND defense was too |
|
43 |
RUSH ATT |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tough. ND really rolled very well on the offensive |
186 |
RUSH YDS |
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
end
of things. |
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
RUSH AVG |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
PASS ATT |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PASS COMP |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
PASS YDS |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PEN YDS |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-28 |
YDS LOST |
-23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINAL SCORE:
1973 Maryland 6 / 1973 Alabama 35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Maryland
Rushing: 55-172 Passing:
5-10-66-0 Fum Lost: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Alabama
Rushing: 65-374 Passing:
5-10-136-3 Fum Lost: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (OH) |
3 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSU |
7 |
6 |
6 |
0 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with 8 min to
go in the 1st lsu gets a 17 yd td run to lead 7 zip |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lsu has fp per
a fum, but missed a short fg earlier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
they have
stopped miami so far and got the fp after the miami punt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lsu has
already started hitting blps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
miami follows
with a nice steady drive capping with a 28 yd fg, 7-3 lsu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lsu gets a 17
yd blp to cap a 5 min drive, miss the xp and lead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13-3 with 4.40
to go in the first half. Lsu proving
to be a flexible team |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with respect
to gameplan and effective and different things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
miami is
playing very good d, but lsu is overcoming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
miami converts
a lsu fum into 3 just before ht |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lsu hits a
short fg to go up 16-6 in the 3rd, then |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
miami fumbles
the ensuing ko and lsu tacks on another 3, 19-6 lsu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it takes
forever for miami to finish what was supposed to be part |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of a comeback
drive, as they don’t' get their td til .20 left |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
great job by lsu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (OH) |
|
LSU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great
versitility of gameplan by the LSU team, |
|
13 |
SCORE |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and they prove
to be tough with their great |
|
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LP, option,
and BLP. Just hard to stop all those, |
277 |
TOTAL YDS |
383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
even for this
awesome defense. Miami still has |
42 |
RUSH ATT |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the problem of going blank
on offense for |
|
169 |
RUSH YDS |
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
periods of
time. LSUs defense was very stiff |
|
4.0 |
RUSH AVG |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
against the run, and it was
another very |
|
22 |
PASS ATT |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
solid
performance for the Tigers. |
|
|
11 |
PASS COMP |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
PASS YDS |
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
14 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA |
3 |
7 |
6 |
15 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
psu opens the
game by going 88 yds in just 6 plays, scoring with a 21 yd td pass 7-0 ps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ps
was running out the clock in the own terr but ucla stopped em and called to
to maybe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
get a score
before ht, well, ucla threw an int and ps returned 24 yds to the ucla 36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
then on the
last play of the first half ps completes a dbp for 39 when they needed 36,
ouch bruins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ucla dominates
the 3rd and ps gives up a fum to ucla in fp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but the ps defense is
incredible and gets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 run stuffs
in this qtr alone, 7 on ( ) results!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ucla scores on
4th and gl from the 1 with 3.50 left to make it 28-23 ps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unbelievable,
ucla gets a 25 yd screen pass to get them to the ps 22 with |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
only
.30 left and ucla had one to, they call a blp and get qr, and roll a 19 ,
td, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 pt run was
good and ucla about to steal the game 31-28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
|
UCLA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it’s a
tough road for some good teams. |
|
28 |
SCORE |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PS played such
great defense in the 2nd half, |
|
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but the many
plays they were getting offensively |
417 |
TOTAL YDS |
402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stopped for
the most part in the 2nd half. Just a
great |
48 |
RUSH ATT |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
game and UCLA
finishes it. |
|
|
|
277 |
RUSH YDS |
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
RUSH AVG |
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
PASS ATT |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PASS COMP |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
PASS YDS |
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
PEN YDS |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-8 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
14 |
10 |
0 |
14 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
7 |
7 |
0 |
3 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each team has
had the ball only once and state has a 7-0 lead after a long |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drive now at
the 5.40 mark. But osu returns the
ensuing ko 101 for td to tie at 7 5.30 left 1st |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
osu gets 45 yd
td dbp for 21-7 lead 5.50 2nd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
state scores
with 2.20 to go in 2nd with 9 yd sop, 21-14 osu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amazingly osu
ret ko 44 yds, then gets a def 15 and finds themselves just |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outside fg
range at the state 27 .20 to go in half, osu tries dbp, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but gets qt,
but gains 10 yds, then kicks 34 yd fg on last play of half |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rare chance of
making that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
|
NC State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tired of
seeing OSU allow gobs of points because |
38 |
SCORE |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on ints and
not playing fp football, I only passed |
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with them on
the state side on the field, and set |
352 |
TOTAL YDS |
375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
them to run a
lot. It worked. OSU really played |
53 |
RUSH ATT |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well and shut
down state in the 2nd half. It was |
305 |
RUSH YDS |
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
good ol fashioned
Buckeye football. State has a |
5.8 |
RUSH AVG |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
really good
offense, so it was good to see this OSU |
3 |
PASS ATT |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
team play like
they can. |
|
|
|
2 |
PASS COMP |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
PASS YDS |
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
PEN YDS |
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
0 |
7 |
17 |
3 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri |
3 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
miz gets the
fp after a terrible mich punt, and get to the mich 1, but a fantastic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gl stand for
mich, even overcoming a def 5, to hold miz to 3. 8.3 left 1st |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mich ends the
1st w/only 1 1st dn and 17 total yds, miz with 6 and 93 yds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mich dodges
some bullets in the 2nd, miz misses 2 fga |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mich
comes back with a drive that includes an 18 yd qr, a 31 yd run, and a 13 yd
pass for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a fst on 3rd
and long, scoring on an 8 yd opt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
half way thru
3rd mich is capping on similar opps in fp that miz failed upon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
earlier, and
lead 17-3 with 6.20 lef tin 3rd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mich uses
their end run well and gets another td run as their offense gets in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gear in the
3rd. Miz has gotten just what they
needed for 4 games when they |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
needed it, but
all of a sudden they are getting 10 yds when they need 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
Missouri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Mich offense
really gets in gear in the 2nd, |
27 |
SCORE |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Mizzou
unusally stops getting those long |
|
19 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
runs on 3rd
down. Big thing in this one was
the |
387 |
TOTAL YDS |
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
difference bet
these two in the red zone. This one |
60 |
RUSH ATT |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
could have
looked very different if that wasn't so. |
314 |
RUSH YDS |
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
RUSH AVG |
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PASS ATT |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PASS COMP |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
PASS YDS |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
PEN YDS |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
10 |
0 |
7 |
21 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
0 |
17 |
7 |
0 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tex dominates
fp in the 2nd and scores all 17 pts off to caps, and looked very good doing
it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
|
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU dominates
the first and last qtrs and wins going |
38 |
SCORE |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
away. Overall, NU does a good job against |
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the powerful Texas ground
game. |
|
|
436 |
TOTAL YDS |
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
RUSH ATT |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343 |
RUSH YDS |
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
RUSH AVG |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
PASS ATT |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PASS COMP |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
PASS YDS |
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
PEN YDS |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-6 |
YDS LOST |
-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston |
14 |
14 |
7 |
14 |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent State |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hu 67 yd int
ret for td 12.40 in 1st |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston |
|
Kent State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston has
not looked so good, on both sides |
|
49 |
SCORE |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of the
ball. Really great game for them. They |
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
were very steady and
productive with their |
|
425 |
TOTAL YDS |
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
running
game. Usually they only show flashes |
|
62 |
RUSH ATT |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of that. Very impressive. |
|
|
|
337 |
RUSH YDS |
147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
RUSH AVG |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PASS ATT |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
PASS YDS |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
PEN YDS |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona St |
21 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richmond |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona St |
|
Richmond |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
SCORE |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
1ST DOWNS |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
TOTAL YDS |
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
RUSH ATT |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
RUSH YDS |
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
RUSH AVG |
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
PASS ATT |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS COMP |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
PASS YDS |
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
PEN YDS |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
7 |
0 |
14 |
3 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Temple |
3 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2nd qtr
controlled by Temple defense, but they miss a fga |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
|
Temple |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The USC
offense is just too much overall for Temple, |
24 |
SCORE |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
who can't get
much offense of their own to help out. |
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399 |
TOTAL YDS |
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
RUSH ATT |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294 |
RUSH YDS |
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
RUSH AVG |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
PASS ATT |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
PASS COMP |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
PASS YDS |
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
PEN YDS |
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Tech |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
6 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a tt int sets
up an easy td for tenn in the 3rd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tenn misses 2
short fgas in the 4th |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vols come up
with a couple of great def plays and stop a drving tt with .20 left in the
game |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at the vol 16
to preserve the win |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Tech |
|
Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just a good ol
fashioned 70's college football |
|
7 |
SCORE |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
game. Not the best TT I've seen this season. |
|
18 |
1ST DOWNS |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fumbles were
deadly for TT, and spoiled several |
286 |
TOTAL YDS |
291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scoring opps. |
|
|
|
|
53 |
RUSH ATT |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
RUSH YDS |
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
RUSH AVG |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PASS ATT |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PASS COMP |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
PASS YDS |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Week 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINAL SCORE:
1973 Oklahoma 20 / 1973 Richmond 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Oklahoma
Rushing: 78-320 Passing:
5-9-105-0 Fum Lost: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Richmond
Rushing: 34-29 Passing: 7-15-55-0 Fum Lost: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINAL SCORE:
1973 Temple 3 / 1973 Notre Dame 23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Temple
Rushing: 50-127 Passing: 5-7-31-0 Fum Lost: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 Notre
Dame Rushing: 62-389 Passing:
5-11-61-1 Fum Lost: 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
3 |
3 |
7 |
0 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
7 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vols rip a 90
yd td run to make it 14-13 bama in 3rd 7.10 left |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
vols turn it
over twice in a row down the stretch in the 4th, leading to 10 pts for bama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
|
Alabama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great
game. I wish I could watch this one on
a virtual |
13 |
SCORE |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESPN
Classics. Tenn hangs tough for 3.5
qtrs. It was |
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
really a
war. Good ol fashioned football,
decided |
317 |
TOTAL YDS |
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by who wins
the battle at the los. The turnovers |
42 |
RUSH ATT |
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bite Tenn in the 4th
and Bama puts it away. |
|
230 |
RUSH YDS |
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenn has a
better passing game, but Bama did well |
5.5 |
RUSH AVG |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with hitting
some timely screen passes. Also, the
Tide |
13 |
PASS ATT |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
got some
important QRs for 1sts on 3rd downs. |
|
8 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
PASS YDS |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
FUM LOST |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
PEN YDS |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (OH) |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
Miami (OH) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amazing
game. Two great defenses at their
best. |
6 |
SCORE |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both offenses
actually did play well. The defenses |
9 |
1ST DOWNS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
are just great
and made for a great one. Michigan |
187 |
TOTAL YDS |
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
was 2 for 2
FGAs, and Miami was 1 for 2. That was |
51 |
RUSH ATT |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it. Only scoring opp in the 2nd half was a
missed |
133 |
RUSH YDS |
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FGA for
Miami. When Miami is playing right,
they |
2.6 |
RUSH AVG |
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
are as good as any
team. But, they have lulls on |
13 |
PASS ATT |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
offense that have set them
back. |
|
|
7 |
PASS COMP |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Today was just
two tough teams going right at |
|
54 |
PASS YDS |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
each other for
60 minutes. And two great defenses |
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that stood
up. What a game. |
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was not
mistakes, turnovers, or bad offense that |
3 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spelled this
score. It was all strong play and
great D. |
7 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
0 |
10 |
0 |
6 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
0 |
0 |
14 |
0 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu scores on a
4 yd option on 3rd and goal for a 7-0 lead, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nu got there
via a 4th and 4 conversion on the ps 34, with a 17 yd sop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
later in the
2nd nu controls the fp via short ps punts and convert another |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4th this a 4th
and 1, and end up getting a 29 yd fg to lead 10 zip |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the 3rd a
40 yd sop off an opt for ps leads to a 2 yd td run, 10-7 nu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
just a few
plays later, nu throws an int (off chart) and ps ret it 33 yds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to the nu 1
and cap with a td plunge, quickly 14-10 ps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with 6 min to
go in the game nu comp a td pass fort 25 yds on 3rd and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
long but miss
the xp 16-14 nu, they converted 4 straight 3rd and longs with passes on the
drive! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
psu
had 3 straight passes black boxed by nu at the end of the game to end
it, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
those passes
totalled over 70 yds, enough for a td technically |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
|
Penn State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PSU hit their
patented end run for a couple of |
|
16 |
SCORE |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
big ones. NU was bit by their very popular |
|
20 |
1ST DOWNS |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
turnover bug
in the 3rd, but played clean |
|
337 |
TOTAL YDS |
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before and
after and when they were clean, |
|
61 |
RUSH ATT |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
they looked
like and played like the better team. |
157 |
RUSH YDS |
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great game,
with tons of great defense. Two high |
2.6 |
RUSH AVG |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
calibre teams. PSUs season in jepardy. |
|
20 |
PASS ATT |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
PASS COMP |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
PASS YDS |
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
PEN YDS |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston |
0 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
7 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hu gets a 36
yd dbp after a short osu punt to set up a fg as their first score in the 3rd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a few min
later, osu throws an int that hu ret for 76 yds and a td and hu leads 10-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
osu
embarks on a 14 play 90 yds drive including a 4th ad 4 conv via an 11 yd
qr, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
capping it
with a 2 yd td run to take a 14-10 lead, drive was all runs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hu
goes to the hu in the last 2 min and drive the ball including qrs of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19, 12, and
then a 17 yd qr to the osu 2 with only 10 sec left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hu runs lp,
but only gets 1 yd, osu wins!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston |
|
Ohio State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another great, classic,
defensive game. |
|
10 |
SCORE |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
1ST DOWNS |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
TOTAL YDS |
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
RUSH ATT |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
RUSH YDS |
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
RUSH AVG |
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS ATT |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PASS COMP |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
PASS YDS |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-6 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSU |
7 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona St |
7 |
0 |
7 |
17 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
asu quickly
takes adv of the subpar lsu pass d with a td drive on their first touch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included are a
12 and 39 yd runs, and 3 for 4 passing with a 24 ydr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
strong def
play against a lsu pass at the gl forces a short fg, 10-7 tigers early 2nd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
asu retakes
lead 4.20 lef t 3rd when lsu gives up td on their def chart (td), 64 yds,
14-13 asu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
asu regains
lead at 24-20 6.50 left in game on 5 yd 3rd and goal td pass, key |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
play of the
drive was a 3rd down def 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
things break
down for lsu as they throw an int while trying to come back, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
asu eats some
clock and yds and get a td to lead 31-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSU |
|
Arizona St |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSU is a very,
very tough team against most of the |
20 |
SCORE |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
teams in this
league because they are strong against |
24 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the run and
their offense. But, they get tested
today |
407 |
TOTAL YDS |
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by a team that
can pass. Although ASU did not |
|
70 |
RUSH ATT |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
throw a lot,
they were effective. ASU made a lot of |
344 |
RUSH YDS |
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
big plays, but
made a lot of mistakes as well early |
4.9 |
RUSH AVG |
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on. The big play running game was very
important |
13 |
PASS ATT |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for ASU today,
who played well. There were some |
5 |
PASS COMP |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
very timely defensive
plays for ASU as well. |
|
63 |
PASS YDS |
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
PEN YDS |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA |
10 |
10 |
7 |
0 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
3 |
0 |
7 |
14 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA just ran
all over USC in the first half, and USC |
UCLA |
|
USC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
could do
nothing. Most of the game USC ruined |
27 |
SCORE |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
good drives
with penalties and turnovers. But, USC |
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
started making some
long runs and big 3rd down |
347 |
TOTAL YDS |
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
passes and got
back in the game. UCLA did a poor |
53 |
RUSH ATT |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
job of moving
the ball and the clock in the 4th, but |
307 |
RUSH YDS |
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC threw an
int late to end it. |
|
|
5.8 |
RUSH AVG |
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA just more
efficient team. |
|
|
14 |
PASS ATT |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PASS COMP |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PASS YDS |
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PEN YDS |
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
7 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas Tech |
7 |
3 |
6 |
7 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tt ret int 45
yds for td for 7-0 lead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
state then
goes 85 yds in 15 plays only one pass, for td |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the 2nd
state caps on tt fum with 28 yd td pass, missed xp 13-7 state |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
state scores
on a 7 yd option set up by a 43 yd er, following yet another tt fum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to extend to
27-16 with 2 min left in the game |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tt does tack
on a td with only :10 left |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
|
Texas Tech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ints hurt
state early, but those tt fumbles seemed |
27 |
SCORE |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
much
larger. It was like tt lost 8 fums
instead of |
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4, they were
all so huge |
|
|
|
350 |
TOTAL YDS |
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
RUSH ATT |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
RUSH YDS |
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
RUSH AVG |
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PASS ATT |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PASS COMP |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
PASS YDS |
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
PEN YDS |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri |
7 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas |
7 |
7 |
10 |
13 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mis scores
just before ht to tie at 14 after a long pr on a short kan punt, then a 25 yd
draw to setup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mis opens the
3rd with a 39 yd int ret for td |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri |
|
Kansas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kan had a
tough task on their hands trying to deal |
21 |
SCORE |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with the mis
running game, but they made important |
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def plays most
of the day. The kan balanced off\ |
270 |
TOTAL YDS |
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
did a nice job
of keeping the mis d off balanced |
51 |
RUSH ATT |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
all day and
things fell apart for mis in the 4th |
|
263 |
RUSH YDS |
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
RUSH AVG |
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
PASS ATT |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
PASS COMP |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PASS YDS |
181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
7 |
10 |
0 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulane |
7 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first score of
game is 71 yd pr for td by tex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tul passing
warms up and they score on a 17 yd td pass, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
then early 2nd
tul scores on a 41 yd screen, cuahgt tex in blitz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tex ties it at
14 with 38 yd option for td |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tex embarks on
a hu drive with 2 min left and comp a dbp for 31 yds to the tul |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3, then runs
it in from there with :30 left to take a dramatic lead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas |
|
Tulane |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tex made a lot
of big runs as usual, but was shut down |
24 |
SCORE |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the 2nd
half. Yet another great game. Good Tulane |
18 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
team still
winless. |
|
|
|
366 |
TOTAL YDS |
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
RUSH ATT |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
RUSH YDS |
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
RUSH AVG |
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS ATT |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
PASS YDS |
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
PEN YDS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9 |
YDS LOST |
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent State |
7 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland |
0 |
10 |
7 |
3 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ks td 24 yd int ret |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mary takes the
lead w a 19 yd er off a fum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ks ties it w a
22 yd fg in 3rd after time cons drive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 play 74 yd
drv incl 14 runs in a row |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mary regains
lead with 6 yd qr for td |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ks drives
with 3 min left but throws int, mary preserves by ret that 39 yds then
ripping 25 yd end run and |
|
|
|
|
|
keeps the fp
for their first win |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kent State |
|
Maryland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I thought ks
would run better. Congrats to terps |
10 |
SCORE |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
who play well
today. 3 ints off terp d chart. |
|
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
TOTAL YDS |
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
RUSH ATT |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
RUSH YDS |
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
RUSH AVG |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
PASS ATT |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PASS COMP |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
PASS YDS |
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
PEN YDS |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-8 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Week 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (OH) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 yd fg for
ou in 2nd setup by mia fum, couple of qrs for ou |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ou sacked mi on a
play that mia had a td pass, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
twice in the
2nd qtr mia failed on 4th down in ou land, but too far for fga |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 31 yd blp
off an option gets mia to the ou 9, but then they throw an int, that was
their chance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unbelievable
finish, mia drives to the ou 26, then on 4th and 8, get a 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
yd qr, but had
off 10, next play was 23 yd dbp for first down, then had a 9 yd pass comp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but ou had qr,
and qr was -3, that diff was enough for mia to miss their fga to tie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the game on
the last play of the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 chance to
score for ou and 4 for redskins. |
|
Oklahoma |
|
Miami (OH) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SCORE |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
1ST DOWNS |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
TOTAL YDS |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
RUSH ATT |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
RUSH YDS |
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
RUSH AVG |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PASS ATT |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
PASS COMP |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PASS YDS |
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
PEN YDS |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
0 |
0 |
3 |
14 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
7 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ps scores on
first poss via patented end run for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a td, 83 yds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ps gets a 7 yd
td pass on a scr to go up 17-0 on nd, early 3rd, ps ret ko 59 yds then |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
also got a 22
yd end run to setup |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ND just could
not overcome the fumbles, and lost |
Notre Dame |
|
Penn State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
every one of
them. PS kept the end runs coming and |
17 |
SCORE |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that was
enough. A long er and a long kor
followed |
20 |
1ST DOWNS |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by a er
(above) were the TDs. ND scores twice
in the |
318 |
TOTAL YDS |
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
last 4 mins
passing the ball, but had the ball in scoring |
50 |
RUSH ATT |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
territiry many
times |
|
|
|
197 |
RUSH YDS |
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
RUSH AVG |
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
PASS ATT |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
PASS COMP |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
PASS YDS |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
PEN YDS |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9 |
YDS LOST |
-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
7 |
24 |
10 |
0 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
0 |
14 |
0 |
7 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. Alabama just plays wonderful and gets a |
Alabama |
|
Ohio State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
big W. Ala explosive running game. Both teams |
41 |
SCORE |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stacked vs
run, Ala let off later. |
|
|
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first drive
ala 7 runs 52 yds, 2 def 5s, 7 pts |
|
306 |
TOTAL YDS |
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
RUSH ATT |
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
os gets the fp
after pinning ala deep then getting the ball back
on the bama 40 after |
233 |
RUSH YDS |
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the punt, bug
play was 4th down 15 yd qr, 8 yd opt for td |
5.1 |
RUSH AVG |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PASS ATT |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ala replies
with 22 yd scr for td, drive included passes of |
5 |
PASS COMP |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 and 33 yds,
(started with a 22 ydr) |
|
|
73 |
PASS YDS |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
scoring fest
all of a sudden, 13 yd qr for td |
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
long kor |
|
|
|
|
0 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and 25 yd opt |
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
PEN YDS |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ala responds
with 94 yd kor for td |
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
still in 2nd
ala gets yet another score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
had 3 straight
B runs, 3rd one for 11 yds scored |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|