1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
North Texas |
7 |
3 |
0 |
6 |
16 |
|
|
|
UNC |
0 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NT scores a TD
on the last play of the game on a 2 yd QR (exactly) |
|
but fails on
the 2 pt try throwing an inc pass. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Texas |
|
UNC |
NT passed more than I
wanted them to, but |
|
16 |
SCORE |
17 |
were effective. It was power football that got |
|
19 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
it done for
the Heels, barely. |
|
|
|
306 |
TOTAL YDS |
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
RUSH YDS |
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
RUSH AVG |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
PASS ATT |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
196 |
PASS YDS |
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
PEN YDS |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-4 |
YDS LOST |
-8 |
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Grambling |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
|
|
Florida State |
17 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Grambling
hangs in there for a long while. FSU |
Grambling |
|
Florida State |
is explosive
and Grambling is counterproductive |
3 |
SCORE |
38 |
versus the run. |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
367 |
TOTAL YDS |
596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
RUSH ATT |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
RUSH YDS |
404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
RUSH AVG |
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
PASS ATT |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
PASS COMP |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
322 |
PASS YDS |
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
PEN YDS |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-16 |
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
OT 1 |
FINAL |
|
|
Arkansas |
3 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
3 |
20 |
|
|
USC |
0 |
14 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ark scores a
TD on a 2 yd option run (exactly) with 3:10 to go in the |
|
game on 4th
and goal. 2 pt conv run good. To lead 17-14. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC kicks 31
yd FG with :10 to go to tie the game.
Good passing to get there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OT 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass INTd def
chart at GL. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 yd FG for
the 20-17 win. (Woulda been good from
70!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arkansas |
Regulation |
USC |
Obviously a very good
game. Ark seemed to |
|
17 |
SCORE |
17 |
slightly
outplay USC most of the game, but USC |
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
finished
drives with TDs, and Ark FGs. It was
good |
369 |
TOTAL YDS |
361 |
for Ark to
have such a great kicker though, as he got |
65 |
RUSH ATT |
46 |
3 pts that USC
would not have. Overall, an even |
303 |
RUSH YDS |
265 |
matchup. USC could do some things to slow the |
4.7 |
RUSH AVG |
5.8 |
Ark running
game. Ark really had a problem
defending |
11 |
PASS ATT |
20 |
the USC
running game, as Ark is mostly a pass def |
7 |
PASS COMP |
6 |
team, so that
difference almost swayed it to USC |
78 |
PASS YDS |
96 |
favor. |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-12 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arkansas |
Final |
USC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
SCORE |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
385 |
TOTAL YDS |
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
RUSH ATT |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
319 |
RUSH YDS |
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
RUSH AVG |
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
PASS ATT |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PASS COMP |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
PASS YDS |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-12 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Pittsburgh |
0 |
0 |
13 |
0 |
13 |
|
|
|
Texas |
7 |
9 |
0 |
3 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pittsburgh |
|
Texas |
Pitt played
excellent defense, which kept them |
|
13 |
SCORE |
19 |
in the game. The kicking game was likely the |
|
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
9 |
difference, as
Texas did great. Texas punted |
|
363 |
TOTAL YDS |
180 |
very well, and
their FG kicker hit all 4 tries, all |
|
57 |
RUSH ATT |
49 |
long. The Pitt kicker missed 2 FGAs, both short, |
|
242 |
RUSH YDS |
186 |
and an extra
point. Pitt lacks the punch on
offense, |
4.2 |
RUSH AVG |
3.8 |
but played
such excellent defense. Texas just had |
12 |
PASS ATT |
10 |
to play safe
and kick well. Pitt is terrible at
fumbles |
7 |
PASS COMP |
2 |
and it cost
them points. Most of the Texas rushing |
121 |
PASS YDS |
-6 |
yards were per
B runs. Really awesome D for Pitt. |
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
Sets up good
2nd round game. Niether team was |
4 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
impressive
here overall. |
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
PEN YDS |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Alabama |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
|
|
|
Michigan |
0 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mich takes a
14-7 lead 1:00 to go in the 3rd with 19 yd int ret for TD, (int on their def
chart). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bama expires
their timeouts stopping Mich late in the 4th, and Bama could not |
|
put
together anything all qtr. But, they
march down the field throwing it with |
|
no
timeouts. Yet they run out of time at
the Mich 12. Good game! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
|
Michigan |
Kinda felt
like a was there on this one. Good
game. |
7 |
SCORE |
14 |
What I might
expect to see in real life. Nice to
see |
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
the turnovers low,
and kinda surprising. Mich |
|
291 |
TOTAL YDS |
261 |
plays steady
which is no surprise. The big
difference |
54 |
RUSH ATT |
53 |
is that Mich
plays much better defensively and that |
205 |
RUSH YDS |
172 |
really came
through in this game. It was actually |
3.8 |
RUSH AVG |
3.2 |
the reason for
the winning TD. Bama's offense was |
11 |
PASS ATT |
12 |
overwhelmed by
the Mich defense today and relied |
6 |
PASS COMP |
6 |
mostly on
breaking a long run. |
|
|
|
86 |
PASS YDS |
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
UNC |
7 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
|
|
|
Florida State |
3 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNC |
|
Florida State |
Though both
offenses played badly, both defenses |
13 |
SCORE |
10 |
played
well. FSU played fantastic run
defense. UNC |
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
12 |
played solid
pass defense. UNC does a better job of |
245 |
TOTAL YDS |
253 |
holding onto
the ball and their defense came up |
63 |
RUSH ATT |
28 |
with a few of
those FSU ints. Down the stretch, FSU |
167 |
RUSH YDS |
125 |
could not stop
UNC and the clock expires. |
|
2.7 |
RUSH AVG |
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS ATT |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PASS COMP |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
PASS YDS |
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
PEN YDS |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9 |
YDS LOST |
-9 |
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
7 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
|
|
|
Ohio State |
14 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
scrimmage play OU 69 yds for TD right up the middle. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OSU takes a
14-7 lead halfway thru 1st with a 64 yd int ret for TD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OSU takes the
ball methodically down the field late 4th and |
|
|
scores on a 5
yd TD run on 4th and 1 with 1:30 left in the game |
|
|
to take a
21-20 lead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
|
Ohio State |
It really
doesn't get any better than this if you |
|
20 |
SCORE |
24 |
like running
football. Both teams played well. |
|
12 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
OU is very
impressive running the ball and seemed |
249 |
TOTAL YDS |
287 |
to rule the
game at all times. But, they just
could |
55 |
RUSH ATT |
65 |
not pull away
and OSU plays very well themselves. |
246 |
RUSH YDS |
242 |
OU tosses 2 ints
very late on dbps trying to come |
4.5 |
RUSH AVG |
3.7 |
back. But, the early int by OU cost them the
game. |
7 |
PASS ATT |
9 |
OSU is
methodical and did well with that. I
like |
|
2 |
PASS COMP |
4 |
this OU
wishbone attack more than the 74 team.
It |
11 |
PASS YDS |
45 |
is consistent
and steady, yet still has that big play |
3 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
power. Very good game. I could do this one over |
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
and over
again. Both defenses really played
well |
3 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
also, and I
think the Buckeye defense played better. |
3 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PEN YDS |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-8 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Clemson |
0 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
14 |
|
|
|
Nebraska |
10 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A 46 yd SOP
for a TD puts Clemson up 14-13 in the 4th, 8:50 left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU moves back
into the lead with 2:40 to go, a 24 yd chip shot FG. |
|
Their drive
was methodical and deliberate. |
|
|
|
|
14 plays, all runs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson was
driving late but lost a fumble on a pass completion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Not close to
the level of play in recent games. |
|
Clemson |
|
Nebraska |
Both these
teams have holes in their game. |
|
14 |
SCORE |
16 |
Defense was
not impressive vs the run. |
|
|
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
NU let Clemson
hang around in this game way |
|
341 |
TOTAL YDS |
348 |
too long. FG kicking difference almost cost the |
|
49 |
RUSH ATT |
66 |
Huskers the game. Clemson is rather careless |
|
253 |
RUSH YDS |
293 |
with the ball. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.2 |
RUSH AVG |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
PASS ATT |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PASS COMP |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
PASS YDS |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
PEN YDS |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-5 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Penn State |
7 |
0 |
14 |
14 |
35 |
|
|
|
Arizona St |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
I was impressed by
this Penn State team, more |
|
Penn State |
|
Arizona St |
than any other
team so far in this set. In the first |
35 |
SCORE |
14 |
half, ASU
stayed in it thanks to PSU's INTs. In
the |
20 |
1ST DOWNS |
13 |
2nd half, Penn
State played clean and ran away |
420 |
TOTAL YDS |
222 |
with it. PSU is very, very good. |
|
|
|
48 |
RUSH ATT |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
RUSH YDS |
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
RUSH AVG |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
PASS ATT |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
PASS COMP |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
PASS YDS |
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
PEN YDS |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9 |
YDS LOST |
-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Kentucky |
3 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
13 |
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
0 |
3 |
10 |
10 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Very good
game. I like Kent, but they don't |
|
Kentucky |
|
Notre Dame |
have enough
for ND. The Irish defense is pretty |
|
13 |
SCORE |
23 |
sick. ND ripped one long QR and a long
option |
|
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
that went 59
yds in the 4th to seal it. Steady play |
220 |
TOTAL YDS |
396 |
from Kent, but
the Irish defense is too much. |
|
50 |
RUSH ATT |
53 |
ND is not
exceptional and they don't bowl over |
|
172 |
RUSH YDS |
304 |
anybody, but
they made some plays on offense |
|
3.4 |
RUSH AVG |
5.7 |
and were
suffocating on D. Good kicking game |
|
13 |
PASS ATT |
15 |
from Kent. |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PASS COMP |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
PASS YDS |
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
PEN YDS |
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Arkansas |
10 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
20 |
|
|
|
Texas |
7 |
3 |
14 |
10 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ark makes a 69
yd FG in the first to go up 10-0.
That’s a record for me!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ark makes a 60
yd FG in the 2nd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arkansas |
|
Texas |
I can't really
put my finger on it for this game. Ark |
20 |
SCORE |
34 |
looked like
they were going to take Texas to school, |
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
but they just
faded away. It did not seem like the
fumbles |
280 |
TOTAL YDS |
383 |
were the big
thing in this one, but of course they had |
46 |
RUSH ATT |
61 |
something to
do with it. Maybe the biggest thing
that |
253 |
RUSH YDS |
336 |
stuck out to
me was that Texas got so many long |
5.5 |
RUSH AVG |
5.5 |
runs. Texas just kept going, and Ark did not. |
|
12 |
PASS ATT |
18 |
It is special
to me that Ark got a 69 yard FG. |
|
3 |
PASS COMP |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
PASS YDS |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-35 |
YDS LOST |
-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Michigan |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
|
UNC |
7 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNC returns an
INT 82 yd for a TD to lead 7-0 late first. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mich scores a
short FG after a UNC INT at their own 10. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With 2 minutes
to go, Mich scores a safety, and they |
|
|
|
just can't
move the ball quickly and time runs out on them |
|
|
at the Tarheel 15. |
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
UNC |
UNC has no
business winning this game. But, for
the |
5 |
SCORE |
13 |
3rd time in a
row, the Heels win a close game with |
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
8 |
the turnover
game. They have played just barely |
364 |
TOTAL YDS |
165 |
good enough to
win it with turnovers. Mich
played |
66 |
RUSH ATT |
47 |
a very off
game today. There were so many
opportunities |
280 |
RUSH YDS |
151 |
that they lost
when they needed a play, and just |
4.2 |
RUSH AVG |
3.2 |
would not make
it. The UNC defense scores their |
18 |
PASS ATT |
5 |
only TD. Michigan blew it today. |
|
|
|
6 |
PASS COMP |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
PASS YDS |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PEN YDS |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Ohio State |
0 |
7 |
7 |
14 |
28 |
|
|
|
Nebraska |
7 |
17 |
0 |
7 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 3rd and 13,
NU rips an option 80 yds for a TD, to go up 14-7 in the 2nd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Terrific game,
all the way through. It was obvious |
Ohio State |
|
Nebraska |
that Ohio
State has the better overall chart, but they |
28 |
SCORE |
31 |
were beaten
today. The Buckeyes did poorly early |
18 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
on with 3rd and
short situations and the Husker |
|
404 |
TOTAL YDS |
382 |
defense came
up with plays when they needed them. |
55 |
RUSH ATT |
63 |
Nebraska hit a 47 yd
FG, which has a very slim |
|
273 |
RUSH YDS |
351 |
chance if you
look at their chart. That was right |
5.0 |
RUSH AVG |
5.6 |
before
halftime and they added 7 more points |
|
13 |
PASS ATT |
8 |
after a big
run right as time expired. Then, of
course, |
8 |
PASS COMP |
3 |
you can see
the very long run earlier in the 2nd.
So, |
131 |
PASS YDS |
31 |
it seemed like
OSU was winning the battle at the line |
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
of scrimmage, but
getting further behind on the |
2 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
scoreboard. It seemed as though OSU was getting |
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
more plays
that you could call victories for them |
4 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
in yards
gained, but when NU did win, they got many |
30 |
PEN YDS |
42 |
more yards on
those plays. It was that way all day |
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
long. OSU chunks it out, while NU hits
doubles |
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
and
homers. Great game to experience and
about |
|
|
|
as good I
think as this NU chart can play. Ohio
State |
|
|
|
also failed on
a 4th and 1 at the Nebraska 3.
There |
|
|
|
were so many
things like that in this game that all |
|
|
|
went against the
Buckeyes. I envisioned Coach |
|
|
|
Hayes on the
sidelines in a rant throwing his |
|
|
|
|
hat all over
the place and yelling at everyone. It
was great. |
|
|
By the way,
the Ohio State run defense played fantastic and |
|
|
made stops all
day long. I cannot imagine what NU
would |
|
|
have done to
an average team today. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Penn State |
0 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State
picks up an easy 3 off a ND fumble in the 2nd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbelievable. ND scores in the hurry up with a TD pass |
|
|
to make it
10-7 PSU with only :30 left. ND
completes a |
|
|
|
43 yd dropback
pass to get to the Penn State 5 yd line, but |
|
|
time expires
on them there. Incredible game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
|
Notre Dame |
What a great
defensive game. From the opening |
10 |
SCORE |
7 |
kick, it looked
like it would be a 0-0 game. The |
9 |
1ST DOWNS |
12 |
fumbles for
the Irish were deadly. ND has a big |
|
149 |
TOTAL YDS |
294 |
weakness in
their fumbling. PSU should have been |
49 |
RUSH ATT |
43 |
ahead by more
in the end, because they botched |
64 |
RUSH YDS |
176 |
turnover
conversions. These two played very,
very |
1.3 |
RUSH AVG |
4.1 |
even, with the
exception of a few longer runs for |
19 |
PASS ATT |
24 |
ND. It was heart pounding in the end. I don't really |
9 |
PASS COMP |
9 |
see how either
team managed a TD in the 4th. Just |
92 |
PASS YDS |
123 |
strung a few
plays together. Great defenses played |
3 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
great
today. Enjoyable game. Probably the biggest |
0 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
factor in the
game besides the ND fumbles was the |
3 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
fantastic punt
returns for PSU. That evened out the |
2 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
field, and
made a big difference in field position |
20 |
PEN YDS |
40 |
and offsetting
the overall yardage advantage for |
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
the
Irish. Penn State probably averaged
over 20 yds |
-7 |
YDS LOST |
-5 |
per punt
return today, if not 25. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Texas |
14 |
3 |
0 |
14 |
31 |
|
|
|
UNC |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas hits a
67 yd SOP for a TD to presumably end it with 10:50 to go, up 24 zip. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A 15 yd INT
ret for a TD scratches the board for UNC, down 24-7 with 8 minutes left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
UNC lost this
game how they have been winning |
Texas |
|
UNC |
prior games,
turnovers. All first half points |
|
31 |
SCORE |
7 |
came off
Tarheel turnovers. Otherwise it was
even. |
10 |
1ST DOWNS |
11 |
UNC scored off
of a Texas turnover, otherwise |
|
310 |
TOTAL YDS |
225 |
they did
nothing. Texas is, of course, far
better |
|
52 |
RUSH ATT |
49 |
than UNC. Yet somehow they managed similar |
|
183 |
RUSH YDS |
159 |
stats in rushing. Texas moves on, and UNC |
|
3.5 |
RUSH AVG |
3.2 |
goes home. |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PASS ATT |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
PASS YDS |
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-18 |
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Nebraska |
0 |
10 |
14 |
7 |
31 |
|
|
|
Penn State |
7 |
14 |
21 |
7 |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska rips
an 87 yd option for a TD in the 2nd.
14-7 Penn State. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
|
Penn State |
Whoa
Nellie! This thing was wild. Real wild. |
|
31 |
SCORE |
49 |
In the end,
Penn State is just a better football team. |
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
Nebraska shows
off their potent offense. Penn State |
401 |
TOTAL YDS |
504 |
is rather
impressive again. All kinds of wild |
|
46 |
RUSH ATT |
62 |
events in this
one. |
|
|
|
|
334 |
RUSH YDS |
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.3 |
RUSH AVG |
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
PASS ATT |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
PASS YDS |
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
PEN YDS |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-4 |
1977 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
Texas |
7 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
|
Penn State |
7 |
14 |
3 |
7 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas fails to
move the ball and loses possession on |
|
|
|
downs with 2
minutes left. PS is able to run out
the clock |
|
|
with the huge
help of a DEF 15 on a punt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
I should have
made in game notes on this. |
|
Texas |
|
Penn State |
It was a good, but
hectic game as there were |
|
24 |
SCORE |
31 |
many momentum swings and big
plays. |
|
|
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
Texas was down 24-10, and made
a nice |
|
317 |
TOTAL YDS |
413 |
comeback to
tie it up. Texas made more big runs |
57 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
while Penn State
grinded along. The Penn State |
223 |
RUSH YDS |
227 |
defense ruled
the Horn ground game for the most |
3.9 |
RUSH AVG |
4.4 |
part, and
Texas really needed more defense today. |
13 |
PASS ATT |
17 |
The most
interesting thing about the game to me |
5 |
PASS COMP |
9 |
was that I
have these two good ground games in |
94 |
PASS YDS |
194 |
front of me and it was
the passing games that |
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
got it done
today. Texas had several drive saving |
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
long QRs. Penn State has a very good passing game, |
1 |
TURNOVERS |
0 |
and I like the
Texas passing game for that matter. |
8 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
Penn State is
unique in that they have strong |
|
58 |
PEN YDS |
40 |
screen and
dropback passes. One drive for them |
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
conprised of 2
dropbacks totalling over 60 yds |
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-8 |
and getting 7
points. Their screen pass was
even |
|
|
|
a larger
impact on the game. It is one of the
best |
|
|
|
screen passes I have ever
seen. |
|
|
|
|
|
I know that
Penn State used their RBs a lot |
|
|
|
|
when they
threw and they were effective at it.
It probably |
|
|
won them this
game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both teams
missed FGAs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|