1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
3 |
10 |
7 |
8 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
0 |
0 |
7 |
24 |
31 |
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
wash scores
after int and 55 yd ret to the nd 10 |
|
28 |
SCORE |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
|
|
|
|
wash makes 48 yd fg .50 left |
|
|
|
415 |
TOTAL YDS |
371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
RUSH ATT |
44 |
|
|
|
|
no magic for nd
great kor 40 yds, but little passing, and they
can't come back. |
267 |
RUSH YDS |
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
RUSH AVG |
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
What a great game. The gameplay was great, |
|
22 |
PASS ATT |
28 |
|
|
|
|
and the team
styles came thru. ND destroyed |
|
10 |
PASS COMP |
15 |
|
|
|
|
Wash for 3 qtrs,
then got their tails handed to them |
155 |
PASS YDS |
193 |
|
|
|
|
in the 4th, in
every way. Nice comback in the end |
3 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
to tie it for ND
with 2 pt conv, but even better |
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
comeback for the
win for Wash. ND plays great |
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
power football,
almost always getting a least |
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
11 |
|
|
|
|
3 yards. You can't just stop one run to get the |
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
90 |
|
|
|
|
ball back. Then they have the best draw play |
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
I have
seen. Very effective with their good
yds in |
-7 |
YDS LOST |
-10 |
|
|
|
|
the passing
game. Wash is one of the the smartest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
playing charts I
have ever seen. Both teams punt great, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Wash can
hurt you with prs and int rets. The
big surprise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
was that Wash
did not pass well at all in the first half.
But, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
the stability
and consistency of their passing game |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
led the way in
the 2nd half. Really great game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ND did miss one
FGA and was stopped on the 2 after getting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a first and goal
on the 4. That drive ended in a good
FG. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early in the
4th, down 20-7, Wash put together a spirited drive with |
|
|
|
|
|
3rd down passes
and got that huge score to make it 20-14.
That is |
|
|
|
|
|
the point where
the game turned toward the Huskies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This actually
might go down as my best BB game of all time.
The gameplay, style, storyline, everything |
|
|
|
was just so great. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
0 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wake Forest |
14 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Tenn would
like to forget about this one. They
missed |
Tennessee |
|
Wake Forest |
|
|
|
|
2 FGAs in the
2nd. And should have done |
|
13 |
SCORE |
21 |
|
|
|
|
a much better
job of finishing drives. The WF run
def |
25 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
|
|
|
|
was crushed all
day with power runs by the Vols, |
387 |
TOTAL YDS |
334 |
|
|
|
|
but Tenn had a
horrible day passing the ball, and |
57 |
RUSH ATT |
31 |
|
|
|
|
WF had the hot
hand passing all first half. Good |
275 |
RUSH YDS |
138 |
|
|
|
|
job by WF. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
RUSH AVG |
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
PASS ATT |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
PASS COMP |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 |
PASS YDS |
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
PEN YDS |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-18 |
YDS LOST |
-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
7 |
0 |
3 |
10 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanford |
0 |
10 |
7 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
|
Stanford |
|
|
|
|
As the stats
show, Florida dominated the game in |
20 |
SCORE |
24 |
|
|
|
|
many ways, but
lost the turnover battle 4-2 and |
|
27 |
1ST DOWNS |
11 |
|
|
|
|
did poorly in
scoring range. The Gators missed |
434 |
TOTAL YDS |
255 |
|
|
|
|
3 FGAs. And, they had to settle for a short FG, |
|
33 |
RUSH ATT |
36 |
|
|
|
|
inside the
10. The Gators completely dominated |
191 |
RUSH YDS |
141 |
|
|
|
|
the first
quarter. Stanford actually played
very |
|
5.8 |
RUSH AVG |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
strong
defense. The Gators would have piled |
|
45 |
PASS ATT |
25 |
|
|
|
|
on the points against
most teams. Very close |
|
26 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
|
|
and good game
the whole way. Two good teams. |
265 |
PASS YDS |
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
PEN YDS |
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-22 |
YDS LOST |
-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wash State |
10 |
20 |
9 |
0 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas |
10 |
7 |
0 |
14 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wash State |
|
Kansas |
|
|
|
|
WSU very good at
capping on Kansas turnovers, |
39 |
SCORE |
31 |
|
|
|
|
and they just made too
many of them. WS is |
|
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
incredible at
the big play passing game. Kansas |
354 |
TOTAL YDS |
435 |
|
|
|
|
a ton of fun to
play with, but too many turnovers |
36 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
|
|
|
|
today. |
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
RUSH YDS |
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
RUSH AVG |
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
PASS ATT |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
PASS COMP |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274 |
PASS YDS |
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
PEN YDS |
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-3 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss St |
7 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
7 |
24 |
7 |
10 |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss St |
|
Florida State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
SCORE |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
1ST DOWNS |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293 |
TOTAL YDS |
582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
RUSH ATT |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
RUSH YDS |
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
RUSH AVG |
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PASS ATT |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
PASS COMP |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149 |
PASS YDS |
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
PENALTIES |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
PEN YDS |
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-19 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia |
10 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
0 |
14 |
10 |
14 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia |
|
Ohio State |
|
|
|
|
Ga dominated the
first qtr and a half. Then OSU |
20 |
SCORE |
38 |
|
|
|
|
found their
offense and Ga began making |
|
28 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
|
|
turnovers. Ga looked great, for a while. OS |
|
472 |
TOTAL YDS |
433 |
|
|
|
|
exposed the Ga
run defense weakness. |
|
|
34 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
RUSH YDS |
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
RUSH AVG |
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
PASS ATT |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
PASS COMP |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
PASS YDS |
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
PEN YDS |
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-4 |
YDS LOST |
-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
6 |
7 |
3 |
6 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami |
0 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
Miami |
|
|
|
|
Terrific back
and forth game. Miami inconsistent |
22 |
SCORE |
17 |
|
|
|
|
with the pass,
and Mich doing what they do well. |
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
|
|
|
|
Impressive job
by Mich against a great defense. |
|
387 |
TOTAL YDS |
300 |
|
|
|
|
Mich power
running, had a TD setup by punt |
|
43 |
RUSH ATT |
36 |
|
|
|
|
return, and
timely passing. Very nice. Miami |
|
191 |
RUSH YDS |
133 |
|
|
|
|
needed more offense and
some big plays., and |
|
4.4 |
RUSH AVG |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
did not get them. |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PASS ATT |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
PASS COMP |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196 |
PASS YDS |
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PEN YDS |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-12 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNC |
6 |
14 |
10 |
6 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syracuse |
7 |
3 |
10 |
14 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNC |
|
Syracuse |
|
|
|
|
Great, but wild
game. UNC looked like they would |
36 |
SCORE |
34 |
|
|
|
|
get blown out as
Cuse scores easily to start |
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
13 |
|
|
|
|
the game. But, the Heel defense surprised and made |
512 |
TOTAL YDS |
343 |
|
|
|
|
some plays in
the first half, and UNC controlled the |
48 |
RUSH ATT |
35 |
|
|
|
|
game with their
offense. After capping on some break, |
219 |
RUSH YDS |
146 |
|
|
|
|
UNC had a big
lead, but back came Syracuse. Things |
4.6 |
RUSH AVG |
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
really got wild
with turnovers. Syr got a very long
int |
35 |
PASS ATT |
23 |
|
|
|
|
ret for a TD
called back for penalty, then returned |
21 |
PASS COMP |
14 |
|
|
|
|
another one,
very long, that stood. Frantic pace to |
302 |
PASS YDS |
197 |
|
|
|
|
the game at
times. But, I was surprised that UNC
could |
4 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
play so well
with a dangerous looking Cuse chart. |
3 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
As you can see
from the plays, UNC can control |
|
7 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
things
well. Very good game. UNC wins it with |
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
a short FG (20
yds) with only :10 left. Syr has a
poor |
40 |
PEN YDS |
47 |
|
|
|
|
pass defense,
and can only int passes to defend it. |
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
0 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanford |
0 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
|
Stanford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
SCORE |
17 |
|
|
|
|
Even game. Bama could not get into much |
|
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
|
|
|
|
rhythm with
their offense, especially their |
|
290 |
TOTAL YDS |
323 |
|
|
|
|
passing
game. Too many penalties for Tide. |
|
36 |
RUSH ATT |
40 |
|
|
|
|
Good defense by
both teams, but Stanford offense |
125 |
RUSH YDS |
148 |
|
|
|
|
much better than
Bama. |
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
RUSH AVG |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
PASS ATT |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
PASS COMP |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184 |
PASS YDS |
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
PEN YDS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-19 |
YDS LOST |
-9 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego St |
3 |
14 |
7 |
7 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wake Forest |
0 |
13 |
13 |
7 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego St |
|
Wake Forest |
|
|
|
|
Frankly, a lot
of really bad football played today. |
31 |
SCORE |
33 |
|
|
|
|
Game became a
back and forth affair in the 3rd, |
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
|
|
and WF make a
late drive to come back and win it. |
394 |
TOTAL YDS |
489 |
|
|
|
|
SDS had the ball
last but with little time. SDS had |
33 |
RUSH ATT |
41 |
|
|
|
|
penalty problems and
hurt themselves a lot on |
|
132 |
RUSH YDS |
257 |
|
|
|
|
both sides of
the ball. There were several big plays |
4.0 |
RUSH AVG |
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
given up by
defense and SDS had a long pr for a |
43 |
PASS ATT |
33 |
|
|
|
|
TD. Not good quality football, but a close
game. |
25 |
PASS COMP |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299 |
PASS YDS |
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-37 |
YDS LOST |
-23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
3 |
0 |
14 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
0 |
3 |
21 |
6 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
nu gets to the
fsu 26 before running out ot time |
|
Nebraska |
|
Florida State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
SCORE |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
|
|
|
|
Excellent
game. The first half was ruled by both |
404 |
TOTAL YDS |
516 |
|
|
|
|
defenses. In the 2nd half, NU did a great job |
|
60 |
RUSH ATT |
23 |
|
|
|
|
putting together
grueling drives, then FSU |
|
221 |
RUSH YDS |
182 |
|
|
|
|
would drive the
length of the field in a play or |
|
3.7 |
RUSH AVG |
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
two, back and
forth, until NU just could |
|
|
28 |
PASS ATT |
34 |
|
|
|
|
not keep up. Incredible # of long gainers for FSU |
14 |
PASS COMP |
18 |
|
|
|
|
in the 2nd half. |
|
|
|
|
|
183 |
PASS YDS |
339 |
|
|
|
|
Some of these
off the NU defensive chart. |
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Sloppy game with
flags. NU plays very clean football. |
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
30+
runs and |
30+ passes |
for fsu |
|
|
0 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
81 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
11 |
|
|
|
|
43 |
62 |
|
|
|
|
66 |
PEN YDS |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-5 |
|
|
|
|
NU had several
20+ gains, but none longer than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 yds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawaii |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
14 |
16 |
7 |
14 |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawaii |
|
Ohio State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
SCORE |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213 |
TOTAL YDS |
524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
RUSH ATT |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223 |
RUSH YDS |
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
RUSH AVG |
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PASS ATT |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
PASS COMP |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
PASS YDS |
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
PEN YDS |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-34 |
YDS LOST |
-6 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado |
0 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wash State |
14 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uc first score
106 yd int ret for td |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cu led by
stewart to score tying td with :50 left |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
then wsu drives
but misses winning try at fg missing from 42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado |
|
Wash State |
|
|
|
|
WSU should have run much
better and should |
|
21 |
SCORE |
21 |
|
|
|
|
have won. |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
TOTAL YDS |
409 |
|
|
|
|
Buffs won high
school style OT 8-6 |
|
|
32 |
RUSH ATT |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
RUSH YDS |
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
RUSH AVG |
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
PASS ATT |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
PASS COMP |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
PASS YDS |
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
INT THROWN |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
PEN YDS |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-21 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas A&M |
0 |
3 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
14 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
This is a very
solid Wash football team. |
|
|
Texas A&M |
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
Most of the
Huskie penalties off the Aggie chart |
|
10 |
SCORE |
35 |
|
|
|
|
DEF flags. |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239 |
TOTAL YDS |
508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
RUSH YDS |
321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
RUSH AVG |
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
PASS ATT |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PASS COMP |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
PASS YDS |
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
PEN YDS |
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-17 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ole Miss |
17 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
7 |
7 |
7 |
3 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ole Miss |
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
Sensational
game. Lots of pace, momentum |
|
34 |
SCORE |
24 |
|
|
|
|
swings,
strategy, team style, defenses making |
|
20 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
|
|
plays, big
offensive breakaways, just great |
|
424 |
TOTAL YDS |
364 |
|
|
|
|
stuff. Ole Miss looks like a good team, they have |
46 |
RUSH ATT |
53 |
|
|
|
|
a strong end run
and very steady run defense. |
|
210 |
RUSH YDS |
292 |
|
|
|
|
Mich major
fumbling problems early, but got |
|
4.6 |
RUSH AVG |
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
things under
control, until their comeback efforts |
23 |
PASS ATT |
19 |
|
|
|
|
in the 4th
produced another one and the int.
Super |
15 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
game. I am actually surprised as I did not expect |
224 |
PASS YDS |
77 |
|
|
|
|
Ole Miss to be
this good. |
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Mich is a great running
team and the Rebels |
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
4 |
|
|
|
|
surprised me
with effective downfield passing. |
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
PEN YDS |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
YDS LOST |
-5 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
14 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNC |
0 |
3 |
10 |
10 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
|
UNC |
|
|
|
|
UNC runs out of
time on the NCSU 33 yd line. |
|
28 |
SCORE |
23 |
|
|
|
|
State's offense
controlled the first half, and they |
|
18 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
really had a hot
hand passing , with good yds. |
|
359 |
TOTAL YDS |
334 |
|
|
|
|
The Heels took
over the momentum in the 2nd |
|
37 |
RUSH ATT |
49 |
|
|
|
|
half, as State
threw a couple of ints, but NC still |
|
174 |
RUSH YDS |
184 |
|
|
|
|
was not getting
it in the EZ. Then the Heels def |
|
4.7 |
RUSH AVG |
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
int'd a pass and 12 yd
ret to the NCSU 2, and |
|
25 |
PASS ATT |
29 |
|
|
|
|
they punched it
in. UNC converted 3 for 3 4th downs. |
17 |
PASS COMP |
16 |
|
|
|
|
State's offense
was just too much for the Heels |
|
216 |
PASS YDS |
154 |
|
|
|
|
overall. This was a very good ball game. UNC |
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
showed control
of the LOS in the 2nd half with |
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
power running
from Means on the suspect interior |
3 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
of the Pack's
D. Good ball game. |
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-31 |
YDS LOST |
-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wake Forest |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanford |
3 |
14 |
10 |
14 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wake Forest |
|
Stanford |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
SCORE |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205 |
TOTAL YDS |
454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
RUSH ATT |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
RUSH YDS |
274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
RUSH AVG |
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
PASS ATT |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PASS COMP |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
PASS YDS |
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PENALTIES |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
PEN YDS |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-18 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado |
7 |
14 |
14 |
3 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
14 |
10 |
7 |
7 |
38 |
FSU 8-0 OT period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Col int rets for
TD in the 3rd of 35 yds and 107 yds! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
another hs ot
coming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
col |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amazing, 7 yd
loss on run, then off 10, then TD on dbp, 2 pt try failed via fsu QT -4 |
|
|
|
|
|
fsu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pass intd col
def chart |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fsu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 yd td pass on
4th and 10, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 pt run good,
46-38 fsu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
col |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4th down pass
intd fsu def chart game over |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
Intense game,
but very hap-hazzard and sloppy, |
Colorado |
|
Florida State |
|
|
|
|
which both teams
are. Col did gameplan the thing |
38 |
SCORE |
46 |
|
|
|
|
quite a bit,
knowing that running was not much of |
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
25 |
|
|
|
|
an option
against this D, so they passed more and |
460 |
TOTAL YDS |
589 |
|
|
|
|
went for the big
play, which paid off. Best game |
31 |
RUSH ATT |
45 |
|
|
|
|
anyone has given
FSU to date. |
|
|
|
121 |
RUSH YDS |
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
RUSH AVG |
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
PASS ATT |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
PASS COMP |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
PASS YDS |
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
FUM LOST |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
TURNOVERS |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
PENALTIES |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
PEN YDS |
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
0 |
7 |
3 |
10 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ole Miss |
3 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
osu 9 yd td pass
to take 20-13 lead 1.50 left in game |
Ohio State |
|
Ole Miss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
SCORE |
13 |
|
|
|
|
time expires on
ole miss, they get to the osu 39. |
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374 |
TOTAL YDS |
209 |
|
|
|
|
Solid ball
game. Except for the turnovers. OSU got |
48 |
RUSH ATT |
35 |
|
|
|
|
a critical QR
for 8 yds and a TD in the 2nd |
|
233 |
RUSH YDS |
113 |
|
|
|
|
on 3rd and goal,
they had INC, Miss had QR. |
|
4.9 |
RUSH AVG |
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
The magic that
was there for Ole Miss in the Mich |
29 |
PASS ATT |
33 |
|
|
|
|
game was not to
be seen today, especially noticeable |
14 |
PASS COMP |
10 |
|
|
|
|
in their passing
game. |
|
|
|
|
154 |
PASS YDS |
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
PEN YDS |
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-13 |
YDS LOST |
-2 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
3 |
10 |
0 |
3 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
7 |
3 |
6 |
21 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NC State |
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
Good game. Very, very much up in the air til the |
16 |
SCORE |
37 |
|
|
|
|
very end. Much closer play than the score shows. |
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
23 |
|
|
|
|
State made some
key offensive plays in the first |
|
297 |
TOTAL YDS |
394 |
|
|
|
|
half, 3rd down
conversions, and long passes. NCSU |
43 |
RUSH ATT |
43 |
|
|
|
|
played real well,
and was really outplaying this |
162 |
RUSH YDS |
201 |
|
|
|
|
very good Washington
team. There were several |
3.8 |
RUSH AVG |
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
key plays in the
game. Wash def int'd State at their |
21 |
PASS ATT |
34 |
|
|
|
|
7, and ended up
turning it into points of their own, |
9 |
PASS COMP |
20 |
|
|
|
|
so there was a
swing. Then, State's turnovers trying |
176 |
PASS YDS |
193 |
|
|
|
|
to comeback led
to more Wash scores. Wash running |
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
game a
consistent problem for the Pack, but they did |
2 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
play very good
pass defense, and it was not a bad |
4 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
day offensively
for the most part for NCSU. The |
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
consistent, well
rounded play of the Huskies pays |
35 |
PEN YDS |
16 |
|
|
|
|
off again. |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
State had the
ball twice inside the Wash 5 with 1st |
-41 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
and goal, but
came away with 2 short FGs. Wash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
recovered three
of their own fumbles in the 2nd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
half. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanford |
7 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
3 |
0 |
14 |
10 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stanford |
|
Florida State |
|
|
|
|
Both defenses
made key plays, and turnovers prevented |
21 |
SCORE |
27 |
|
|
|
|
much scoring in
the first half. FSU finished drives in |
20 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
|
|
the 2nd half and
cleaned up their play. Both defenses |
325 |
TOTAL YDS |
392 |
|
|
|
|
showed well. |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
RUSH ATT |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
RUSH YDS |
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
RUSH AVG |
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
PASS ATT |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
PASS COMP |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
PASS YDS |
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
PEN YDS |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-16 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
7 |
7 |
0 |
17 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
7 |
3 |
14 |
6 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
osu
turns back to back ints into tds via the int rets 36 and 35 yds, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
so big swing in
the 4th |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
Well, it was a
classic. Great, even game. Wash |
31 |
SCORE |
30 |
|
|
|
|
ripped some
longer runs. Huskies score with |
|
27 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
|
|
:20 left, but
fail on 2 pt pass attempt. The
Ohio |
|
414 |
TOTAL YDS |
394 |
|
|
|
|
State INT
returns won it for them in the 4th. |
|
48 |
RUSH ATT |
35 |
|
|
|
|
Even teams. |
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
RUSH YDS |
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
RUSH AVG |
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
PASS ATT |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
PASS COMP |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
PASS YDS |
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
PEN YDS |
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1992 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
0 |
7 |
6 |
14 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
17 |
0 |
7 |
6 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
OSU hits a 44 yd
FG on the last play of the game |
Florida State |
|
Ohio State |
|
|
|
|
to win the tourney. |
|
|
|
|
27 |
SCORE |
30 |
|
|
|
|
It was a superb
game. OSU starts the game on
fire, |
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
16 |
|
|
|
|
and FSU makes
turnovers. Very big plays and |
|
533 |
TOTAL YDS |
365 |
|
|
|
|
long gainers
thru the 1st qtr for OSU. Really
intense |
40 |
RUSH ATT |
44 |
|
|
|
|
game between
very good teams. FSU made |
|
274 |
RUSH YDS |
165 |
|
|
|
|
too many mistakes against
a team that was |
|
6.9 |
RUSH AVG |
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
too good. Good offense and defense displayed. |
32 |
PASS ATT |
30 |
|
|
|
|
Very strong
comeback by FSU hitting a desperation |
17 |
PASS COMP |
17 |
|
|
|
|
4th and long dbp
for 20 yds against a blitz. OSU |
259 |
PASS YDS |
208 |
|
|
|
|
after FSU tied
it, took it the length of the field |
|
4 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
in the last 3 min,
suffered an OFF 10 to make it |
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
a low % FGA, but
made it. They deserved the game |
7 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
and played their
best. |
|
|
|
|
11 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
High power high
risk barely falls short for Noles. |
91 |
PEN YDS |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|