1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
7 |
17 |
0 |
17 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado |
0 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
4 real solid
quarters by the Sooners, who are a |
|
Oklahoma |
|
Colorado |
|
|
pretty solid
team in many ways. CU really is an |
|
41 |
SCORE |
21 |
|
|
unstable team,
much like their '94 and '95 teams. |
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
28 |
|
|
CU can move the ball
in chunks, but OU got some |
389 |
TOTAL YDS |
515 |
|
|
INTs and CU
really plays bad pass defense. It |
|
43 |
RUSH ATT |
46 |
|
|
was just a cool
calm performance by OU. |
|
199 |
RUSH YDS |
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
RUSH AVG |
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
PASS ATT |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
PASS COMP |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190 |
PASS YDS |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
PEN YDS |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
7 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego St |
3 |
14 |
0 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SDS hits 2
dbps for 28 yds each and rallies to score a go ahead td with only 1:10 left
in the game. |
|
PS misses a 36
yd FGA by 3 yds on the game's last play and SDS gets the upset! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
|
San Diego St |
|
|
A very good
football game. PSU ought to be |
|
21 |
SCORE |
24 |
|
|
ashamed of
themselves for letting SDS even |
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
be in this game with
them. SDS has terrible |
|
456 |
TOTAL YDS |
399 |
|
|
defense and PSU
should have run away from |
|
38 |
RUSH ATT |
32 |
|
|
them. Credit SDS though, who got timely plays. |
203 |
RUSH YDS |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
RUSH AVG |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PASS ATT |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
PASS COMP |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
PASS YDS |
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-8 |
YDS LOST |
-21 |
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Reg |
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
0 |
13 |
7 |
10 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
UNC |
17 |
3 |
10 |
0 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ot1 |
ot2 |
ot3 |
|
Final |
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
3 |
7 |
8 |
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
UNC |
3 |
7 |
0 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
reg |
Home |
|
|
Superb
game. One of the best I've had. The |
|
Tennessee |
|
UNC |
|
|
interaction
between teams was great, as was the |
30 |
SCORE |
30 |
|
|
momentum swings
and game pace. Tenn started |
21 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
|
|
out very badly on
offense, but its like you could |
398 |
TOTAL YDS |
534 |
|
|
just sense that
would not continue. The Vols offense |
33 |
RUSH ATT |
55 |
|
|
got going and OT
looked inevitable even in the |
203 |
RUSH YDS |
399 |
|
|
2nd qtr. UNC started scoring FGs instead of TDs |
|
6.2 |
RUSH AVG |
7.3 |
|
|
and may have
let the game slip through their hands |
37 |
PASS ATT |
21 |
|
|
in that way,
even in the latter part of the 1st qtr. |
20 |
PASS COMP |
11 |
|
|
The action was
really great and these two strong |
205 |
PASS YDS |
140 |
|
|
teams really
showed their styles. I really love
these |
3 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
two teams and
the way they play. The charts are |
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
perfect. All 3 INTs for the Vols came off the Heel |
5 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
defensive
chart. The Tenn fumbles were
early. |
1 |
PENALTIES |
10 |
|
|
It’s a shame anybody
had to lose this one, and |
|
3 |
PEN YDS |
62 |
|
|
UNCs 2nd
turnover ended it. |
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
YDS LOST |
-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OT 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
including ot |
Home |
|
|
Tenn |
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
|
UNC |
|
|
Hits 28 yd FG,
33-30 Vols |
|
|
|
|
30 |
SCORE |
30 |
|
|
UNC |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
Makes 27 yd FG.
33-33 |
|
|
|
|
466 |
TOTAL YDS |
575 |
|
|
OT 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
RUSH ATT |
64 |
|
|
UNC |
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
RUSH YDS |
432 |
|
|
1 yd td run,
after 18 yd run on 3rd and 4. 40-33
UNC |
5.9 |
RUSH AVG |
6.8 |
|
|
Tenn |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
PASS ATT |
24 |
|
|
7 yd td pass
after an 11 yd completion on 4th and 3, tied at
40. |
24 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
OT 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
PASS YDS |
148 |
|
|
Tenn |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
1 yd td run, 2
pt run good, 48-40 Vols. |
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
UNC |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
Lost fumble on
3rd and 4 pass completion, Vols win 48-40. |
3 |
PENALTIES |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
PEN YDS |
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
YDS LOST |
-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (FL) |
3 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
7 |
0 |
10 |
6 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami (FL) |
|
Alabama |
|
|
More
surprises. As the game wore on, the
Miami |
10 |
SCORE |
23 |
|
|
offense faded
away. Alabama was incredibly |
|
20 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
consistent,
grinding the ball up the middle and |
|
377 |
TOTAL YDS |
418 |
|
|
Bama was just
sensational on 3rd down passing, |
30 |
RUSH ATT |
50 |
|
|
really the key to
their success. Surprised by the |
193 |
RUSH YDS |
170 |
|
|
rather poor Cane
passing performance, but Bama |
6.4 |
RUSH AVG |
3.4 |
|
|
can defend the
pass well. Alabama managed the |
39 |
PASS ATT |
29 |
|
|
game with their
offense, and played real clean. |
|
16 |
PASS COMP |
18 |
|
|
They just had
an unbelievable day passing the ball, |
193 |
PASS YDS |
255 |
|
|
which ain't easy against
Miami. |
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
PEN YDS |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9 |
YDS LOST |
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
7 |
14 |
7 |
3 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Boston College |
0 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
Boston College |
|
|
Could not be
more impressed with Michigan. BC |
31 |
SCORE |
10 |
|
|
has poor run
defense and Mich looked like they |
|
27 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
|
|
knew what they
had to do, and just did it for 4 |
|
450 |
TOTAL YDS |
368 |
|
|
qtrs. Very strong team is Mich. Strong run |
|
54 |
RUSH ATT |
28 |
|
|
defense as well
for Mich and good pressure on the |
220 |
RUSH YDS |
82 |
|
|
QB. I love the power running game of Mich and |
4.1 |
RUSH AVG |
2.9 |
|
|
they are quite
capable in the passing game. I am |
28 |
PASS ATT |
45 |
|
|
looking very
forward towards the ND/Michigan game. |
17 |
PASS COMP |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
PASS YDS |
309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-6 |
YDS LOST |
-23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona |
7 |
16 |
7 |
7 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fresno St |
3 |
0 |
14 |
17 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona had
led the whole game, but found themselves down 34-30 with only 2:30 to go in
the game, |
|
thanks to some
hot FS passing. Arizona chose to punt,
instead of going for it on 4th and 4, and pinned |
|
FS on their
own 3 yard line. FS fumbled on the
next play, a line plunge, and Arizona capped with a TD, |
|
to re-take the
lead 37-34. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the Bulldogs
ensuing possession, the QB fumbled on a QR, and FS lost the ball. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Kinda a crazy
game, but that was expected. Ariz |
Arizona |
|
Fresno St |
|
|
took things
slowly, running a lot against the horrible |
37 |
SCORE |
34 |
|
|
FS rush
defense. FS had their offense set to a
balanced |
19 |
1ST DOWNS |
24 |
|
|
attack, trying to
be cautious of the Wildcats D. |
|
436 |
TOTAL YDS |
444 |
|
|
Arizona's
defense crushed FS in the first half, and |
56 |
RUSH ATT |
34 |
|
|
the Wildcats
were cruising after one half of play. |
311 |
RUSH YDS |
161 |
|
|
FS set their
offense to an all out passing game for |
5.6 |
RUSH AVG |
4.7 |
|
|
the 2nd
half. Obviously, that worked. Read the |
|
15 |
PASS ATT |
39 |
|
|
in-game notes
for the ending. It turned into a good |
8 |
PASS COMP |
26 |
|
|
game. Both teams have things they do well. Arizona |
132 |
PASS YDS |
302 |
|
|
is the better
overall team and that defense is something |
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
to
behold. |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-7 |
YDS LOST |
-19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA |
14 |
14 |
7 |
7 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
Va Tech |
0 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA |
|
Va Tech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
SCORE |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
TOTAL YDS |
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
RUSH ATT |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
RUSH YDS |
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
RUSH AVG |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
PASS ATT |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
PASS COMP |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
PASS YDS |
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-8 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Auburn |
7 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas State |
3 |
7 |
10 |
3 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KS ties the
game in the 2nd with a 68 yd TD run, via the make it or break it Auburn
blitz, (TD). |
|
|
At
the end of the game, Auburn drives down the field, only to lose a fumble on a
completion at the |
|
KS 1 yard
line. But, KS turns right around and
loses a fumble of their own and Auburn scores on a TD |
|
pass to go
ahead 24-23 with :40 left. KS was held
to a FG after having it first and goal on the Auburn 4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Kinda odd game
between two kinda odd charts. |
Auburn |
|
Kansas State |
|
|
KSU likes to
pass, but is not good at completing |
|
24 |
SCORE |
23 |
|
|
passes. Against the horrible Tiger defense, they |
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
balanced out
their play calls. Auburn has a decent |
386 |
TOTAL YDS |
422 |
|
|
offense, and
should have beaten KSU soundly in |
32 |
RUSH ATT |
42 |
|
|
my
opinion. Auburn called a lot of
blitzes, as that |
152 |
RUSH YDS |
206 |
|
|
defense gives
them a good chance of stopping the |
4.8 |
RUSH AVG |
4.9 |
|
|
run, and some
chance of stopping some passes, and |
37 |
PASS ATT |
30 |
|
|
the rest of
their defense stinks. That worked at
times, |
24 |
PASS COMP |
16 |
|
|
and did not at
other times. Lucky ending for Auburn. |
250 |
PASS YDS |
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
PEN YDS |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-16 |
YDS LOST |
-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
7 |
14 |
14 |
0 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OU misses 3
FGAs in the first half. 35, 36 and 51
yds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
I thought this
would be a good team for FSU to |
|
35 |
SCORE |
0 |
|
|
play to see how
good they are. OU is well rounded |
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
and plays
solid, but is not a powerhouse. I
think |
502 |
TOTAL YDS |
293 |
|
|
FSU shows how
good they are today. OU missed |
38 |
RUSH ATT |
53 |
|
|
4 FGAs overall. |
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
RUSH YDS |
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
RUSH AVG |
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
PASS ATT |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268 |
PASS YDS |
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
PEN YDS |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Texas A&M |
3 |
14 |
7 |
10 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
San Diego St |
3 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas A&M |
|
San Diego St |
|
|
SDSU gets their
lone TD on a TD pass on the last |
34 |
SCORE |
13 |
|
|
play of the
game, a token score. The fact that |
|
28 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
|
|
I bother to say
that proves there weren't many |
|
406 |
TOTAL YDS |
279 |
|
|
highlights. The Aztecs have no defense, and they |
50 |
RUSH ATT |
28 |
|
|
gave A&M
plays all day. It was an easy win
for |
|
182 |
RUSH YDS |
111 |
|
|
the Aggies. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
RUSH AVG |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
PASS ATT |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
PASS COMP |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
PASS YDS |
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
0 |
14 |
14 |
7 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
0 |
10 |
10 |
18 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Is there really
a need to say much? I really felt |
|
Florida |
|
Tennessee |
|
|
like I was
watching this one on TV and that the |
|
35 |
SCORE |
38 |
|
|
stadium was
rocking! An even 613 yds a piece. |
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
33 |
|
|
Never quite had
a game like this. It wasn't really |
613 |
TOTAL YDS |
613 |
|
|
wild or
anything, just real intense, no other way |
20 |
RUSH ATT |
22 |
|
|
to describe it,
but this one lived up to any hype. |
|
137 |
RUSH YDS |
123 |
|
|
The momentum
swings were "big" and often. |
|
6.9 |
RUSH AVG |
5.6 |
|
|
The Vols had
the ball last, … and so they win |
|
48 |
PASS ATT |
69 |
|
|
with a game
winning FG with :10 left, from 31 yds. |
35 |
PASS COMP |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
495 |
PASS YDS |
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
PEN YDS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-19 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
13 |
10 |
10 |
7 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
0 |
3 |
3 |
21 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
|
Alabama |
|
|
OSU runs away
with the game early and coasts. |
40 |
SCORE |
27 |
|
|
Bama's
turnovers were converted into easy OSU |
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
scores early
and often. OSU shut down the Tide's |
359 |
TOTAL YDS |
435 |
|
|
ground
game. Once Bama turned to the air, it |
|
53 |
RUSH ATT |
37 |
|
|
was really too
late. Nice job by the Buckeyes. |
|
225 |
RUSH YDS |
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
RUSH AVG |
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
PASS ATT |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS COMP |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
PASS YDS |
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
PEN YDS |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-6 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
0 |
12 |
0 |
8 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
0 |
7 |
3 |
13 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame |
|
Michigan |
|
|
Hard to figure
out how ND lost this one, although |
20 |
SCORE |
23 |
|
|
it was tight
the whole way and both teams played |
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
well. Pretty close to a classic in many
ways. ND |
436 |
TOTAL YDS |
420 |
|
|
was pinned with
their backs against the goalline |
45 |
RUSH ATT |
50 |
|
|
for much of the
2nd half, after playing a very solid |
306 |
RUSH YDS |
267 |
|
|
first
half. ND held Mich on a goalline stand
in the |
6.8 |
RUSH AVG |
5.3 |
|
|
early parts of
the 3rd qtr. Penalties hurt the Irish |
20 |
PASS ATT |
23 |
|
|
all game. In the 4th, Mich took advantage of their |
12 |
PASS COMP |
13 |
|
|
field position
advantage and scored the go ahead |
130 |
PASS YDS |
153 |
|
|
FG for a 13-12
lead. After an ND punt, Mich had the |
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
most important
drive of the day, a 9 minute drive |
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
that they
finished with a TD, … the fatal blow, and |
1 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
really their
only good sustained drive of the day. |
13 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
ND responded
with a quick score and 2 pt pass, |
|
85 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
|
|
to tie the game
at 20. With 1:10 left in regulation, |
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
Mich returned the
kickoff to their 39. Then they |
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
completed a
couple of passes and had a huge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gain off the QT
for 21 yards. (Only 3 green boxes on
their |
|
|
|
|
QT column). This put them in FG range and Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
hits the FG for
the win. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notre Dame
really is a very, very good team. I
think |
|
|
|
|
|
they could even be
the champs of this league in |
|
|
|
|
|
a regular
season environment. Good job by
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
in a well
played game for both teams. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
West Virginia |
0 |
0 |
13 |
3 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona |
0 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
It was a real war of
a game. WV really had no |
|
West Virginia |
|
Arizona |
|
|
answer for the
great Arizona D. WV went with |
|
16 |
SCORE |
14 |
|
|
a blitz heavy
defensive game plan, and overall |
|
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
|
|
that
worked. WV started moving the ball a
little |
208 |
TOTAL YDS |
282 |
|
|
in the 2nd half
and took advantage of some |
|
46 |
RUSH ATT |
36 |
|
|
turnovers. The WV kicker missed 2 FGAs in the 1st |
125 |
RUSH YDS |
154 |
|
|
half, but made
the rest, which was big (3 of 5 total). |
2.7 |
RUSH AVG |
4.3 |
|
|
Arizona was
very close to FG range in the last minute |
28 |
PASS ATT |
34 |
|
|
of the game,
but WV intercepts a pass (their defensive |
10 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
chart) to win
the game. That was also on a blitz. |
83 |
PASS YDS |
131 |
|
|
The QR/QT of WV
were the only good plays they had. |
0 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
PEN YDS |
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Reg |
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
6 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
UCLA |
7 |
10 |
0 |
3 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OT 1 |
|
Final |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
7 |
|
27 |
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
UCLA |
6 |
|
26 |
|
|
Nebraska |
reg |
UCLA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
SCORE |
20 |
|
|
OT 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
TOTAL YDS |
431 |
|
|
3 yd TD run,
after 3 DEF penalties! 27-20 NU. |
|
65 |
RUSH ATT |
29 |
|
|
UCLA |
|
|
|
|
|
214 |
RUSH YDS |
229 |
|
|
14 yd TD run,
all runs, UCLA misses PAT!! NU wins
27-26! |
3.3 |
RUSH AVG |
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
PASS ATT |
41 |
|
|
UCLA gave the
Huskers option attack fits all day. |
8 |
PASS COMP |
19 |
|
|
Better stated,
the Bruins basically dominated NU's |
86 |
PASS YDS |
216 |
|
|
option
game. When Nebraska did look good,
which |
0 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
was rare, they
looked real good, and still in the face |
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
of some very
good defense. UCLA kills the option |
1 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
and was stacked
against it all day. Lots of big runs |
2 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
and some long gainers
on screens was the UCLA |
10 |
PEN YDS |
65 |
|
|
dosage of
offense. Pretty good game. NU missed |
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
their first PAT
of the game, UCLA misses their last. |
0 |
YDS LOST |
-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
Final |
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
|
UCLA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
SCORE |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
TOTAL YDS |
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
RUSH ATT |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219 |
RUSH YDS |
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
RUSH AVG |
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
PASS ATT |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PASS COMP |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
PASS YDS |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PEN YDS |
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin |
14 |
7 |
0 |
10 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Auburn |
10 |
0 |
17 |
0 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Very sloppy
game. Went back and forth with |
|
Wisconsin |
|
Auburn |
|
|
the
turnovers. The Auburn defense is very
poor. |
31 |
SCORE |
27 |
|
|
Auburn was set
defensively to blitz most of the day, |
33 |
1ST DOWNS |
16 |
|
|
which did help
them, but not quite enough. |
|
582 |
TOTAL YDS |
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
RUSH ATT |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
RUSH YDS |
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
RUSH AVG |
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PASS ATT |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
PASS COMP |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323 |
PASS YDS |
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
PEN YDS |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-8 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
7 |
21 |
6 |
3 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Texas A&M |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Game's first
possession, FSU on 3rd and 9 calls a screen, Aggies had a 5 roll on a blitz,
(TD), ouch 73 yds worth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Later, in the
2nd qtr, FSU pops a 78 yd end run for a td, to take it to 28 zip. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
|
Texas A&M |
|
|
And here I
thought FSU might get tested. |
|
37 |
SCORE |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
1ST DOWNS |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
661 |
TOTAL YDS |
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
RUSH ATT |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
RUSH YDS |
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.0 |
RUSH AVG |
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
PASS ATT |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
PASS COMP |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343 |
PASS YDS |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-11 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
0 |
10 |
7 |
3 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
14 |
3 |
0 |
10 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenn gives up a
(TD) result on a B defense vs a first and 10 OSU pass, from 67 yds, to give |
|
|
OSU a 24-20
lead with 9:20 to go in the 4th. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenn misses a
40 yd FGA with 4 minutes to go, and OSU drives down the field quickly and |
|
|
puts 3 of their
own on the board, 27-20 Buckeyes, 1:20 to go. |
|
|
|
|
OSU preserves
the win with an INT, their def chart. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee |
|
Ohio State |
|
|
Decent
game. Not great, but decent. The Vols had |
20 |
SCORE |
27 |
|
|
problems
stopping the OSU ground game. |
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
When OSU
completes passes, it is often for big |
|
354 |
TOTAL YDS |
516 |
|
|
yards, and the
Buckeyes basically avoided the |
|
30 |
RUSH ATT |
49 |
|
|
INT today. |
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
RUSH YDS |
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
RUSH AVG |
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
PASS ATT |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
PASS COMP |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
229 |
PASS YDS |
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
PEN YDS |
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-27 |
YDS LOST |
-17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
3 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
West Virginia |
0 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
West Virginia |
|
|
Michigan keeps
their run going with a very solid |
24 |
SCORE |
10 |
|
|
game
today. They really executed well when
they |
20 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
|
|
had to. The Mich defense played consistently well, |
419 |
TOTAL YDS |
306 |
|
|
especially versus the
run. WV does not have a |
|
57 |
RUSH ATT |
40 |
|
|
strong D, and
they just could not come up with many |
251 |
RUSH YDS |
147 |
|
|
stops. The turnovers were a factor as well, in
the |
4.4 |
RUSH AVG |
3.7 |
|
|
Mich
win. |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
PASS ATT |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
PASS YDS |
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
PEN YDS |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Reg |
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
7 |
10 |
0 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin |
0 |
0 |
17 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OT 1 |
|
Final |
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Nebraska |
3 |
|
27 |
|
|
Nebraska |
reg |
Wisconsin |
|
|
Wisconsin |
6 |
|
30 |
|
|
24 |
SCORE |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370 |
TOTAL YDS |
386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
RUSH ATT |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
273 |
RUSH YDS |
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
RUSH AVG |
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
PASS ATT |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PASS COMP |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
PASS YDS |
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
PEN YDS |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
Final |
Wisconsin |
|
|
NU had full
control of this game, but could not |
|
27 |
SCORE |
30 |
|
|
sustain drives
in the 2nd half and it gets away from |
24 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
them. The Wis offense got hot in the 2nd half,
and |
377 |
TOTAL YDS |
411 |
|
|
NU really went
downhill fast. In this matchup, I |
|
63 |
RUSH ATT |
46 |
|
|
got a chance to see
how good and consistent the |
280 |
RUSH YDS |
218 |
|
|
Husker option
can be, as Wis does not shut it down |
4.4 |
RUSH AVG |
4.7 |
|
|
on
defense. Even with Wis stacked against
the option, |
17 |
PASS ATT |
24 |
|
|
NU moved the
ball well. This NU team seems to be |
7 |
PASS COMP |
13 |
|
|
more steady,
slow and consistent with their option, |
97 |
PASS YDS |
200 |
|
|
as opposed to the
KO type of attack found in the |
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
mid to latter
1990s Husker teams. |
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
PEN YDS |
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
3 |
17 |
10 |
7 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
0 |
3 |
3 |
7 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSU loses 2
fumbles in their own territory in the 1st qtr and OSU fails to scratch the
board at all. |
|
The Buckeyes
miss 2 short FGAs in the 1st half, but make a 48 yarder. |
|
|
|
Time after
time, in the first half, FSU was saved by strong QT and QR results. |
|
|
|
With :40 to go
in the 1st half, OS is at midfield and I decide to throw the ball and try to
get a score before |
halftime. OSU throws an INT (their offensive chart)
and FSU completes 2 long passes, and hits a FG on |
|
the last play
of the 1st half. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
|
Ohio State |
|
|
The notes above
show what could have been |
|
37 |
SCORE |
13 |
|
|
for OSU in the
start of the game. Overall, the FSU |
29 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
|
|
defense really
played well and shut down OSU. |
|
513 |
TOTAL YDS |
237 |
|
|
There were tons
of good QT and QR results for |
|
45 |
RUSH ATT |
37 |
|
|
FSU. But, the thing that really stood out to me
was |
232 |
RUSH YDS |
96 |
|
|
the total lack
of impact by the OSU defense today. |
5.2 |
RUSH AVG |
2.6 |
|
|
They really did
not start making plays until halfway |
38 |
PASS ATT |
25 |
|
|
through the 4th
qtr. |
|
|
|
|
29 |
PASS COMP |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
281 |
PASS YDS |
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
3 |
21 |
7 |
0 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Wisconsin is a
very good team, but they did not |
|
Michigan |
|
Wisconsin |
|
|
match up well
against Michigan. Wis missed their |
31 |
SCORE |
10 |
|
|
first 3 FGAs,
two of them very short ones. They |
|
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
|
|
failed to cap on
an early INT. If Michigan could |
342 |
TOTAL YDS |
302 |
|
|
stay away from
the pass, with the Badgers dangerous |
47 |
RUSH ATT |
41 |
|
|
secondary, they
would have a chance. The Mich |
216 |
RUSH YDS |
132 |
|
|
defense really
played solid. Both teams were set |
4.6 |
RUSH AVG |
3.2 |
|
|
to run, and to
defend the run. Wis was forced to open |
19 |
PASS ATT |
32 |
|
|
up and pass
more, and the Michigan D really stopped |
11 |
PASS COMP |
18 |
|
|
their ground game,
which is impressive. Wis did |
126 |
PASS YDS |
185 |
|
|
have more success
passing, but Mich made quite |
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
a few plays
there down the stretch as well. Mich |
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
converted Wis
turnovers into points. The key to |
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
the game and
the matchup problem for Wis was that |
8 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
Michigan runs a
very solid counter, and that is the one |
60 |
PEN YDS |
50 |
|
|
play that Wis
does not stop well. Mich pounded the |
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
counter at Wis,
and it was very effective all day. |
0 |
YDS LOST |
-15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
10 |
28 |
7 |
7 |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
0 |
0 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida State |
|
Michigan |
|
|
FSU opens up
the passing game early and puts |
|
52 |
SCORE |
21 |
|
|
this one
away. They start eating clock with 5
minutes |
29 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
|
|
to go in the
2nd qtr! Its bad when you are in a
game |
642 |
TOTAL YDS |
315 |
|
|
like this and
in the 2nd half think "ya know, Michigan |
41 |
RUSH ATT |
39 |
|
|
is doing pretty
well". |
|
|
|
|
235 |
RUSH YDS |
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
RUSH AVG |
3.6 |
|
|
That's how good
FSU is. |
|
|
|
|
39 |
PASS ATT |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
PASS COMP |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410 |
PASS YDS |
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
PEN YDS |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-3 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|