1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Colorado State |
14 |
14 |
7 |
6 |
41 |
|
Colorado State |
|
Kansas State |
|
|
Kansas State |
3 |
0 |
14 |
7 |
24 |
|
41 |
SCORE |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528 |
TOTAL YDS |
355 |
|
|
qtr 1 - ks 19
yd fg, 3-0 ks. Off fum. |
|
|
|
|
42 |
RUSH ATT |
28 |
|
|
qtr 1 - cs 36
yd scr pass for td, 7-3 cs. Caught ks
in blitz, def (td). |
|
194 |
RUSH YDS |
131 |
|
|
qtr 1 cs 7 yd
td pass, 14-3 cs. |
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
RUSH AVG |
4.7 |
|
|
qtr 2 - 3 yd
td run, 21-3 cs. |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
PASS ATT |
48 |
|
|
qtr 2 - cs 18
yd td pass, 28-3 cs. |
|
|
|
|
21 |
PASS COMP |
27 |
|
|
qtr 3 - 13.30
cs 37 yd td pass, 35-3 cs. |
|
|
|
|
347 |
PASS YDS |
258 |
|
|
qtr 3 - 10.10
ks 11 yd td pass, 35-10 cs. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
qtr 3 - .10 ks
1 yd td run, 35-17 cs. |
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
qtr 4 - 11.30
cs 34 yd fg, 38-17 cs. |
|
|
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
qtr 4 - 8.50
ks 3 yd td pass, 38-24 cs. |
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
qtr 4 - 2.20
cs 26 yd fg, 41-24 cs. |
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-13 |
YDS LOST |
-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auburn |
0 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
14 |
10 |
7 |
14 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 1 - 12.40
ala 3 yd td pass, 7-0 ala. Off aub fum
on kor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 1 - 5.00
ala 10 yd td pass, 14-0 ala. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 2 - 9.30
ala 7 yd td pass, 21-0 ala. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 2 - 4.00
ala 21 yd fg, 24-0 ala. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 2 - .10
aub 23 yd td pass, 24-7 ala. On 4th
down. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 3 - 8.30
aub 1 yd td run, 24-14 ala. Good
drive. Used screen well. |
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 3 - 6.10
ala 20 yd td run, 31-14 ala. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 4 - 13.00
aub 7 yd td pass, 31-21 ala. Off ala
fum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 4 - 9.50
aub misses 38 yd fga, by 2 yds. Setup
by 22 yd pr and bama stalling offense.
Bama D makes key stop on run. |
|
qtr 4 - 4.20
ala 23 yd td run, 38-21 bama. Long,
clutch drive for ala. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 4 - 1.30
ala 12 yd td pass, 45-21 ala. Iced. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auburn |
|
Alabama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
SCORE |
45 |
|
|
Ala outclasses
Aub big time. Aub would not give up
though |
|
19 |
1ST DOWNS |
25 |
|
|
and actually
had an opp in the 4th before Bama closed em |
|
358 |
TOTAL YDS |
489 |
|
|
out. Ala jumped all over Aub early with the
passing game, |
|
33 |
RUSH ATT |
46 |
|
|
and it
remained potent all day. Many
successful screen |
|
|
168 |
RUSH YDS |
247 |
|
|
passes for
both teams, especially Bama. Ala looks
like a |
|
|
5.1 |
RUSH AVG |
5.4 |
|
|
lethal team. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
PASS ATT |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
PASS COMP |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
PASS YDS |
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-21 |
YDS LOST |
-16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington State |
21 |
0 |
6 |
3 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 1 - 12.10
ws 24 yd td pass, 7-0 ws. Converted a
4th and 5, between a fga and punting. |
|
|
|
|
qtr 1 - 7.40
ws 36 yd int ret for td, 14-0 ws. Off
utah off chart. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 1 - 5.30
ws 13 yd td pass, 21-0 ws. Got 35 yd
option. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 1 - 2.20
utah misses 50 yd fga. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 2 - 9.00
ws misses 36 yd fga. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 2 - 2.20
utah misses 33 yd fga. Great, great WS
defense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 3 - 12.20
ws 41 yd fg, 24-0 ws. Off utah fum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 3 - 5.30
ws 31 yd fg, 27-0 ws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 4 - 12.00
ws 36 yd fg, 30-0 ws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 4 - 4.50
utah 26 yd fg, 30-3 ws. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington State |
|
Utah |
|
|
Power ratings
say Utah wins by 4 or 5. Power |
|
|
|
30 |
SCORE |
3 |
|
|
ratings are
wrong. I'd pick WSU 10 times out of |
|
|
|
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
25 |
|
|
10. That WSU defense is amazing, especially vs. |
|
|
316 |
TOTAL YDS |
418 |
|
|
the run, which
Utah refused to test. Utah can pass |
|
|
31 |
RUSH ATT |
28 |
|
|
really
well. But, penalties and turnovers
killed chances |
|
|
115 |
RUSH YDS |
70 |
|
|
of overcoming
this sensational defense. |
|
|
|
3.7 |
RUSH AVG |
2.5 |
|
|
Watch out
Oregon. WSU may make advancement quite |
|
|
28 |
PASS ATT |
52 |
|
|
tough. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
PASS COMP |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
PASS YDS |
364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PEN YDS |
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-29 |
YDS LOST |
-16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado State |
7 |
7 |
0 |
14 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
14 |
14 |
21 |
7 |
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
qtr 1 - neb 11
yd td run, 7-0 neb. |
|
|
|
|
Colorado State |
|
Nebraska |
|
|
qtr 1 - 5.00
neb 6 yd td pass, 14-0 neb. |
|
|
|
|
28 |
SCORE |
56 |
|
|
qtr 1 - 1.10
cs 4 yd td run, 14-7 neb. |
|
|
|
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
24 |
|
|
qtr 2 - 12.20
neb 1 yd td run, 21-7 neb. |
|
|
|
|
409 |
TOTAL YDS |
546 |
|
|
qtr 2 - 9.10
cs 3 yd td run, 21-14 neb, on a qr. |
|
|
|
49 |
RUSH ATT |
56 |
|
|
qtr 2 - .30
neb 7 yd td run, 28-14 neb. Got the
short field after 28 yd pr. |
171 |
RUSH YDS |
428 |
|
|
qtr 3 - 12.10
neb 43 yd int ret for td, 35-14 neb. |
|
|
|
3.5 |
RUSH AVG |
7.6 |
|
|
qtr 3 - 6.10
neb 49 yd td run, 42-14 neb. |
|
|
|
33 |
PASS ATT |
19 |
|
|
qtr 3 - 3.10
neb 4 yd td run, 49-14 neb. Good pr
setup. |
|
|
16 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
qtr 4 - 13.20
cs 14 yd td run, 49-21 neb. QR. |
|
|
|
257 |
PASS YDS |
118 |
|
|
qtr 4 - 9.30
neb 1 yd td run 56-21 neb. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
qtr 4 - 0.20
cs 33 yd td pass, 56-28 neb. |
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
PEN YDS |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-19 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas A&M |
7 |
14 |
7 |
7 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado |
7 |
10 |
7 |
8 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 1 - 14.50
A&M 100 yd kor for td, 7-0 aggies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 1 - 7.20
col 8 yd td run, 7-7, on a qr from an option. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 2 - 14.20
A&M 1 yd td run, 14-7 aggies.
Taking adv of CU poor pass defense. |
|
|
|
|
qtr 2 - 11.10
A&M 74 yd int ret for td, 21-7 aggies.
CU was driving hard. |
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 2 - 5.40
Col 9 yd td pass, 21-14 aggies.
Horrible pass def gave Buffs 2 big comps, one was the td . |
|
|
|
qtr 2 - 0.10
Col 32 yd fg, 21-17 A&M. Drove 80
yds in 1.5 min. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr 3 - 12.00
Col 8 yd td run, 24-21 Col. They are
very good. Cordell making lots of good
plays. |
|
|
|
qtr 3 - 2.00
A&M 3 yd td pass, 28-24 Aggies.
Once again the Col pass def gives yds on a long pass, the only real
play the aggies had. |
qtr 4 - 11.50
Col 11 yd td pass, 35-24 Aggies. A
very good drive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
qtr
4 - 3.40 A&M 5 yd td run, 2 pt conv pass, 35-32 Aggies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas A&M |
|
Colorado |
|
|
The Aggies
preserve the win with an INT in the very end. |
|
|
35 |
SCORE |
32 |
|
|
A couple of
plays here and there, and the INTs, and the |
|
|
18 |
1ST DOWNS |
31 |
|
|
game leaned
the Aggies way. A legit win, as
A&M is |
|
|
331 |
TOTAL YDS |
614 |
|
|
a quite good
team. Colorado hurt themselves all day |
|
|
36 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
|
|
giving yds on
passes. The Colorado offense is
amazing, |
|
|
107 |
RUSH YDS |
353 |
|
|
and I will
have to see them vs. Nebraska when the tourney |
|
3.0 |
RUSH AVG |
6.8 |
|
|
is done. Stewart was great running and passing. Nice |
|
|
30 |
PASS ATT |
40 |
|
|
job Aggies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
PASS COMP |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
PASS YDS |
261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Boston College |
7 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
21 |
|
Boston College |
|
NC State |
|
|
NC State |
6 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
|
21 |
SCORE |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
BC runs pretty
well, they don't pass well! BC played
pretty |
|
309 |
TOTAL YDS |
237 |
|
|
good defense,
considering. Both teams are just awful |
|
|
45 |
RUSH ATT |
24 |
|
|
with
turnovers. Niether should do
well. BC does a great |
|
|
183 |
RUSH YDS |
91 |
|
|
job at getting
to the QB. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
RUSH AVG |
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
PASS ATT |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS COMP |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
PASS YDS |
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
INT THROWN |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
FUM LOST |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
TURNOVERS |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
PEN YDS |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia |
17 |
3 |
0 |
21 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duke |
0 |
10 |
0 |
39 |
49 |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia |
|
Duke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
SCORE |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
Unbelievable
game. It started as a snoozer, and it
looked |
|
|
384 |
TOTAL YDS |
496 |
|
|
like
the far superior Cavs would route.
Then, UVA came down |
|
53 |
RUSH ATT |
29 |
|
|
to earth, and
Duke competed. It turned into a good
ball game, |
|
191 |
RUSH YDS |
128 |
|
|
and half way
thru the 4th, Va lost a key fumble, but Duke's |
|
|
3.6 |
RUSH AVG |
4.4 |
|
|
golden opp
only landed them 3 pts, and they were still down |
|
42 |
PASS ATT |
55 |
|
|
20-13. The next time Duke got the ball deep in
their territory |
|
20 |
PASS COMP |
31 |
|
|
but a
defensive mistake by Va led to a 54 yd td pass, and a |
|
207 |
PASS YDS |
385 |
|
|
20-20
tie. Va reponded well and took it the
distance of the |
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
field for the
go ahead td, 27-20. Duke responded in
kind |
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
scoring the
tying td with about a minute left. |
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
The two
continued trading tds in OT, Duke twice converting |
|
1 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
4th and
long. In OT 3, Va could not convert a
4th and 6, and |
|
6 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
loses this
incredible contest 49-41. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-14 |
YDS LOST |
-17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Penn State |
14 |
17 |
14 |
13 |
58 |
|
Penn State |
|
Indiana |
|
|
Indiana |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
58 |
SCORE |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752 |
TOTAL YDS |
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
RUSH YDS |
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
RUSH AVG |
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
PASS ATT |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
PASS COMP |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505 |
PASS YDS |
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
PEN YDS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
7 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
0 |
0 |
10 |
7 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
osu first td a
60+yd screen on a blitz def (td) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first half
ended via terrific GL stand as Mich tried for the fg from the 1, nope a (-1)
stopped em. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
|
Michigan |
|
|
Mich had the
ball with :20 left, threw a 28 yd comp pass |
|
|
21 |
SCORE |
17 |
|
|
oob, then a
DEF PI on OSU moved the ball 15 yds to |
|
|
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
|
|
the OS 25 yd
line with no time left. The dbp fell
inc and |
|
|
318 |
TOTAL YDS |
400 |
|
|
the Buckeyes win |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
RUSH ATT |
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
RUSH YDS |
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.8 |
RUSH AVG |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
PASS ATT |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PASS COMP |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
PASS YDS |
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PEN YDS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
0 |
6 |
10 |
3 |
19 |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Miami |
13 |
17 |
0 |
7 |
37 |
|
Alabama |
|
Miami |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
SCORE |
37 |
|
|
I am impressed
with the Canes on both sides of the ball. |
|
|
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
Although both
Fla and FSU are studs, they may just make |
|
|
275 |
TOTAL YDS |
468 |
|
|
the upset next
game. |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
RUSH ATT |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
RUSH YDS |
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
RUSH AVG |
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
PASS ATT |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PASS COMP |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
PASS YDS |
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-14 |
YDS LOST |
-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida |
6 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
20 |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Florida State |
0 |
10 |
7 |
0 |
17 |
|
Florida |
|
Florida State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
SCORE |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391 |
TOTAL YDS |
351 |
|
|
Both Ds made
plays all day. The FSU pass def
took |
|
|
40 |
RUSH ATT |
40 |
|
|
probably 60 -
80 yds off pass comp. Flor was set to
pass after the |
|
216 |
RUSH YDS |
199 |
|
|
1st qtr
but called tons of runs. The Nole
running game was |
|
5.4 |
RUSH AVG |
5.0 |
|
|
doing great,
but they went dry in the 4th. There
were only |
|
40 |
PASS ATT |
35 |
|
|
very small
glimpses of what was supposed to be explosive |
|
18 |
PASS COMP |
16 |
|
|
offenses. Flor scored the go ahead td on a long, nice
drive |
|
199 |
PASS YDS |
163 |
|
|
with 1 minute
left. FSU followed with 4 inc's on
dbps. |
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
PEN YDS |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-24 |
YDS LOST |
-11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
includes OT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Arizona |
7 |
6 |
7 |
39 |
59 |
|
Arizona |
reg |
USC |
|
|
USC |
14 |
21 |
10 |
20 |
65 |
|
45 |
SCORE |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
1ST DOWNS |
24 |
|
|
ot tied at 45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
549 |
TOTAL YDS |
541 |
|
|
ot 1 exchanged
tds |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
RUSH ATT |
38 |
|
|
ot 2 same |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
RUSH YDS |
155 |
|
|
ot 3 ariz
threw int usc def chart |
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
RUSH AVG |
4.1 |
|
|
but usc misses
long fga |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
PASS ATT |
32 |
|
|
ot 4 usc
scores but inc on 2 pt |
|
|
|
|
26 |
PASS COMP |
25 |
|
|
ariz fails to
score usc wins |
|
|
|
|
|
353 |
PASS YDS |
388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
PEN YDS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-14 |
YDS LOST |
-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
ariz scores 25
straight in the 4th to comeback. |
|
|
|
Arizona |
final |
USC |
|
|
wilcats full
of mistakes and spotted usc many pts |
|
|
59 |
SCORE |
65 |
|
|
to start the
game. USC then made turnovers in |
|
|
|
28 |
1ST DOWNS |
29 |
|
|
the 2nd half
and cooled a little. Wild game all
offense |
|
|
627 |
TOTAL YDS |
620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
RUSH ATT |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
RUSH YDS |
203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
RUSH AVG |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
PASS ATT |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
PASS COMP |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
PASS YDS |
419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
PEN YDS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-14 |
YDS LOST |
-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington State |
0 |
0 |
3 |
14 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon |
10 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington State |
|
Oregon |
|
|
Really an
amazing game. WSU dominated the game |
|
|
17 |
SCORE |
18 |
|
|
defensively
all day, but the offense kept fumbling the |
|
|
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
|
|
ball,
sometimes recovering, sometimes losing it.
The Ore |
|
|
299 |
TOTAL YDS |
217 |
|
|
defense
played well also, but not near as well as WS. |
|
|
42 |
RUSH ATT |
35 |
|
|
In the 2nd
half, the fumbling relented for WSU and they |
|
|
131 |
RUSH YDS |
77 |
|
|
took over the
game, their D still dominating. In the
end, |
|
|
3.1 |
RUSH AVG |
2.2 |
|
|
WS got a fum
from Ore and had it won with :30 left, the |
|
|
33 |
PASS ATT |
35 |
|
|
ball deep in
their own end. But, I ran a play as I
always |
|
|
16 |
PASS COMP |
16 |
|
|
do and WS lost
another fumble. Ore replied with a 13
yd pass |
|
168 |
PASS YDS |
157 |
|
|
to the
WS 3. Then, on the game's last play,
they completed |
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
a SOP for the
TD. They went for 2, and got a
completion, |
|
|
6 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
BUT WSU had a
QR. The QR was for 7 yds and the |
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
2pt conv was
good for the incredible win. Note on
the |
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
winning td
for Ore, they actually had a F+9, but since it |
|
|
44 |
PEN YDS |
27 |
|
|
was in the EZ,
I count that as a complete pass. So, a
bunch |
|
0 |
SACKED |
4 |
|
|
of events took
place in a short time. |
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
7 |
7 |
0 |
14 |
28 |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Texas A&M |
3 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
17 |
|
Nebraska |
|
Texas A&M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
SCORE |
17 |
|
|
This one was
really up in the air til late in the game. |
|
|
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
|
|
Neb had a kor for a
td come back via penalty and |
|
|
387 |
TOTAL YDS |
393 |
|
|
a PR for a td
that A&M had the * result for on their punt. |
|
|
52 |
RUSH ATT |
35 |
|
|
A&M
balanced their attack, which gave them a huge |
|
|
237 |
RUSH YDS |
135 |
|
|
advantage, as
they were set defensively to stop the Neb |
|
|
4.6 |
RUSH AVG |
3.9 |
|
|
running
game. Neb made all their to's in the
first half, |
|
|
22 |
PASS ATT |
33 |
|
|
but the Aggies
started making to's themselves in the |
|
|
15 |
PASS COMP |
22 |
|
|
2nd half, and
the tide turned. On paper, because of
Neb's |
|
|
150 |
PASS YDS |
265 |
|
|
not so great
pass defense, this one is a tight matchup.
A&M stops |
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
the run fairly
well. Neb hit 2 long td runs, and
played clean |
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
in the 2nd
half. It was amazing how many times
Neb got |
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
inside the
Aggie 35 yd line, yet would end up punting. |
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
Neb may have
had 4 or 5 FGA with a decent kicker, and |
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
42 |
|
|
had penalties
kill one td chance, that ended up in a punt. |
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Boston College |
0 |
6 |
7 |
7 |
20 |
|
Boston College |
|
Duke |
|
|
Duke |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
|
20 |
SCORE |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
1ST DOWNS |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
TOTAL YDS |
301 |
|
|
Duke looked
good at times in the passing game, but not nearly |
|
51 |
RUSH ATT |
29 |
|
|
often
enough. Duke's only strength, that
passing offense, waned |
|
190 |
RUSH YDS |
132 |
|
|
as the game
went on. Duke missed some scoring opps
in the |
|
3.7 |
RUSH AVG |
4.6 |
|
|
1st half and
did not cap on any turnovers. BC is a
steady team |
|
30 |
PASS ATT |
40 |
|
|
with
a solid defense and took their time.
Once BC got settled |
|
16 |
PASS COMP |
19 |
|
|
down,
they made it look easy. Duke's defense
is terrible, and |
|
235 |
PASS YDS |
173 |
|
|
literally gave
BC their last TD. BC has a little big
play potential, |
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
in addition to
being a well rounded team, something Duke is not. |
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
PEN YDS |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
0 |
21 |
7 |
7 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
7 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OSU's first
score was an 80 yd scr pass, off the PS defense, who had the (TD) result! |
|
|
|
|
4th qtr, OSU
breaks an end run for 51 yds, then scores on a 12 yd td pass, but they have a
poor pat %, and they roll a 35 and miss!! |
PS leads by 1,
28-27 after the above, with 6:50 left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
|
Ohio State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
SCORE |
27 |
|
|
OSU stuffed many
PS runs, but OS could not get it |
|
|
24 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
|
|
together on the
passing game. Once PS began to |
|
|
506 |
TOTAL YDS |
434 |
|
|
throw
consistently, they were tough to stop. |
|
|
|
38 |
RUSH ATT |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151 |
RUSH YDS |
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
RUSH AVG |
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
PASS ATT |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
PASS COMP |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.80769 |
359 |
PASS YDS |
215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
PEN YDS |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-4 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Miami |
0 |
13 |
7 |
0 |
20 |
|
Miami |
|
Florida |
|
|
Florida |
6 |
21 |
10 |
3 |
40 |
|
20 |
SCORE |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
16 |
|
|
This game
misleading in many ways. One of the
the most |
|
|
459 |
TOTAL YDS |
357 |
|
|
intense games
I've ever played. Miami missed 2 FGA's
in the |
|
30 |
RUSH ATT |
36 |
|
|
first half,
and Florida made FGs from all ranges.
Niether team |
|
145 |
RUSH YDS |
189 |
|
|
is good at
taking care of the ball. All but one
INT all day came |
|
4.8 |
RUSH AVG |
5.3 |
|
|
off the
offenses charts. Indicative of the
personalities of these |
|
50 |
PASS ATT |
36 |
|
|
two, there
were lots of mistakes, but lots of big plays.
Florida |
|
27 |
PASS COMP |
20 |
|
|
had a huge
advantage all day in the punting game, and the FG |
|
314 |
PASS YDS |
191 |
|
|
kicking. Both made a difference. Miami just threw too many INTs |
|
5 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
and Florida
took care of the ball enough. You
would not know it |
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
from looking,
but the defenses were awesome in this game. |
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
Florida's
D waned a little at times, and the game fizzled in the |
|
11 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
end, but it
was impressive to see the offenses make so many big plays, |
75 |
PEN YDS |
40 |
|
|
just to have
the defenses counter them. That
happened all day |
|
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
at an amazing
pace. Both these teams would have had
600+ yards |
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-23 |
|
|
against an
average defense today. Very, very
intense game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
7 |
10 |
14 |
3 |
34 |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Oregon |
7 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
USC |
|
Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
SCORE |
10 |
|
|
USC has a
great big play passing game. In the
first half, USC's |
|
25 |
1ST DOWNS |
22 |
|
|
TDs came via a
92 yd dbp and 40+ yd INT ret. In the
2nd half, |
|
523 |
TOTAL YDS |
325 |
|
|
Oregon's
offense and defense waned, and SC moves on. |
|
|
36 |
RUSH ATT |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143 |
RUSH YDS |
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
RUSH AVG |
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
PASS ATT |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
PASS COMP |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397 |
PASS YDS |
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
PEN YDS |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-17 |
YDS LOST |
-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
USC |
10 |
0 |
7 |
14 |
31 |
|
USC |
|
Boston College |
|
|
Boston College |
3 |
21 |
3 |
7 |
34 |
|
31 |
SCORE |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410 |
TOTAL YDS |
477 |
|
|
BC used the
strategy of trying to shorten the game by keeping the |
|
32 |
RUSH ATT |
51 |
|
|
ball as much
as possible. They got some breaks in
the turnover |
|
166 |
RUSH YDS |
245 |
|
|
dept. and were
able to really milk the clock in the 2nd half. USC's |
|
5.2 |
RUSH AVG |
4.8 |
|
|
passing game
was a little off, but BC also played pretty good D. |
|
36 |
PASS ATT |
33 |
|
|
The big play
didn't show up for USC today. Also,
there were a |
|
22 |
PASS COMP |
22 |
|
|
couple of
major breakdowns by the SC defense, which in a sense |
|
254 |
PASS YDS |
240 |
|
|
cost them the
game. |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
PEN YDS |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
YDS LOST |
-8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Boston College |
10 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
|
Boston College |
|
Nebraska |
|
|
Nebraska |
7 |
10 |
21 |
7 |
45 |
|
17 |
SCORE |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
|
|
NU would have
been in real trouble today against a good |
|
|
320 |
TOTAL YDS |
465 |
|
|
team,
especially in the 1st half. BC stopped
themselves |
|
|
44 |
RUSH ATT |
48 |
|
|
plenty in the
3rd qtr, and the INTs came off the BC |
|
|
134 |
RUSH YDS |
283 |
|
|
offensive
chart. The Husker defense did rise up
as the |
|
|
3.0 |
RUSH AVG |
5.9 |
|
|
game went on,
and it was comfortable in the end. |
|
|
42 |
PASS ATT |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
PASS COMP |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
PASS YDS |
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
PEN YDS |
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-15 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penn State |
14 |
14 |
3 |
7 |
38 |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Florida |
7 |
10 |
14 |
6 |
37 |
|
Penn State |
|
Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
SCORE |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
1ST DOWNS |
30 |
|
|
Just a back
and forth, penalty ridden, scoring-fest. |
|
|
491 |
TOTAL YDS |
533 |
|
|
Florida made
many more defensive plays than PSU, |
|
|
40 |
RUSH ATT |
38 |
|
|
but
not enough. I went for 2 in the end
with Florida, trying |
|
196 |
RUSH YDS |
265 |
|
|
to win it for
them right there, but the pass attempt failed. |
|
|
4.9 |
RUSH AVG |
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
PASS ATT |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
PASS COMP |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 |
PASS YDS |
271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
PENALTIES |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
PEN YDS |
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-9 |
YDS LOST |
-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
14 |
0 |
7 |
14 |
35 |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Penn State |
0 |
3 |
21 |
13 |
37 |
|
Nebraska |
|
Penn State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
SCORE |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
26 |
|
|
NU came out
of the gates on fire. PSU did not look
like |
|
|
443 |
TOTAL YDS |
502 |
|
|
themselves in
their passing game in the 1st half. NU
faded thru |
|
44 |
RUSH ATT |
43 |
|
|
the middle
portion of the game, but made some big plays in the 4th qtr. |
280 |
RUSH YDS |
202 |
|
|
Each team
traded scores via fumbles with their backs against |
|
6.4 |
RUSH AVG |
4.7 |
|
|
their
goalline. The Penn State passing game
got going in |
|
21 |
PASS ATT |
33 |
|
|
the 2nd half,
like they have all tourney, and they were tough |
|
15 |
PASS COMP |
23 |
|
|
to catch. I was pulling for Nebraska, but they came
up just short. |
|
169 |
PASS YDS |
309 |
|
|
NU had the
ball last but ran out of time as they crossed midfield. |
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
PEN YDS |
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-6 |
YDS LOST |
-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebraska |
7 |
6 |
3 |
0 |
16 |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
FSU |
7 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
|
Nebraska |
|
FSU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
SCORE |
9 |
|
|
A very good,
defensive game. Far more intense
really than |
|
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
|
|
the
championship game, but not the suspense.
Both teams |
|
292 |
TOTAL YDS |
261 |
|
|
had less than
100 total yards after the 1st half.
NU's defense |
|
56 |
RUSH ATT |
30 |
|
|
continually
got INT's when FSU got into Nebraksa territory in |
|
205 |
RUSH YDS |
81 |
|
|
the
2nd half. That stood out as the main
factor in the Husker |
|
3.7 |
RUSH AVG |
2.7 |
|
|
win. FSU had some dry moments passing the ball,
but Nebraska |
|
14 |
PASS ATT |
40 |
|
|
made some big
plays on pass defense, including a sack to end |
|
6 |
PASS COMP |
20 |
|
|
the game when
FSU was again inside the Nebraska 20. |
|
|
87 |
PASS YDS |
196 |
|
|
Good red zone
defense by FSU forced 3 NU FGs. |
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
PEN YDS |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
Michigan |
14 |
10 |
10 |
14 |
48 |
|
Michigan |
|
Colorado |
|
|
Colorado |
7 |
7 |
14 |
14 |
42 |
|
48 |
SCORE |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
1ST DOWNS |
25 |
|
|
Michigan is
good both ways, Colorado gives up much on |
|
|
594 |
TOTAL YDS |
511 |
|
|
pass defense
and is insane offensively. Close game,
but |
|
|
43 |
RUSH ATT |
48 |
|
|
a little too
wild for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
305 |
RUSH YDS |
314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.1 |
RUSH AVG |
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PASS ATT |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
PASS COMP |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301 |
PASS YDS |
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
PEN YDS |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-12 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|