| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 04 Va Tech | 14 | 14 | 17 | 3 | 48 | ||||||
| 97 Auburn | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 20 | ||||||
| 1st score of the day comes early, auburn 6 yd td pass, setup by vt fumble. | |||||||||||
| with still 9:10 left in the 1st, auburn again strikes after a turnover, this one an int in auburn territory, | |||||||||||
| it was a 47 yd fg, to lead 10 zip. | |||||||||||
| vt scores on a 15 yd int ret (aub off chart) to go up 14-10, still in the 1st after a nice drive puts vt on the board. | |||||||||||
| vt gets a 61 yd int ret to extend lead to 28-20, still 5 to go in the half. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Basically it just comes down to the fact that | 04 Va Tech | 97 Auburn | |||||||||
| it is very hard to move the ball against a | 48 | SCORE | 20 | ||||||||
| defense of this caliber consistently when | 28 | 1ST DOWNS | 14 | ||||||||
| you pass heavy and they can set their defense | 408 | TOTAL YDS | 276 | ||||||||
| to stop it. VT is very dangerous with INTs, | 54 | RUSH ATT | 19 | ||||||||
| especially on their pass defenses, so it was | 203 | RUSH YDS | 59 | ||||||||
| only a matter of time for VT. | 3.8 | RUSH AVG | 3.1 | ||||||||
| 29 | PASS ATT | 48 | |||||||||
| 19 | PASS COMP | 21 | |||||||||
| 230 | PASS YDS | 221 | |||||||||
| 2 | INT THROWN | 6 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 7 | |||||||||
| 8 | PENALTIES | 9 | |||||||||
| 52 | PEN YDS | 67 | |||||||||
| 3 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| -25 | YDS LOST | -4 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 01 Florida | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 42 | ||||||
| 01 Fresno St | 0 | 10 | 14 | 13 | 37 | ||||||
| florida leads 14-0 after a 20 yd int ret for td, 2:50 to go in the 1st, int was off flor def chart. | |||||||||||
| fs scratches the board with 30 yd fg, 14-3 florida, early 2nd, off int florida off chart. | |||||||||||
| fs closes to 28-24 7:40 to go in the 3rd, after a flor int conversion to a td. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| It certainly was not easy, but the crème eventually | 01 Florida | 01 Fresno St | |||||||||
| rose to the top. Florida has a better pass defense | 42 | SCORE | 37 | ||||||||
| than FS, and as long as the Gators are not throwing | 28 | 1ST DOWNS | 26 | ||||||||
| ints all over the place, they are winning this one. | 576 | TOTAL YDS | 407 | ||||||||
| 250 yds of passing from Florida in the 1st half. | 27 | RUSH ATT | 30 | ||||||||
| 165 | RUSH YDS | 123 | |||||||||
| 6.1 | RUSH AVG | 4.1 | |||||||||
| 57 | PASS ATT | 54 | |||||||||
| 36 | PASS COMP | 29 | |||||||||
| 420 | PASS YDS | 287 | |||||||||
| 6 | INT THROWN | 4 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 7 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 12 | PENALTIES | 4 | |||||||||
| 118 | PEN YDS | 25 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| -9 | YDS LOST | -3 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 02 NC State | 14 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 31 | ||||||
| 96 Navy | 3 | 7 | 0 | 13 | 23 | ||||||
| with 2:10 to go in the game, navy closes to 31-23 (missed xp) | |||||||||||
| this drive went 88 yds and included 4 straight completions of 10+ yds. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Both teams gave a flare of what they can do. | 02 NC State | 96 Navy | |||||||||
| State is a very solid offensive team. Navy played | 31 | SCORE | 23 | ||||||||
| very poor defense and gave lots of yards. | 29 | 1ST DOWNS | 23 | ||||||||
| 523 | TOTAL YDS | 415 | |||||||||
| 26 | RUSH ATT | 51 | |||||||||
| 120 | RUSH YDS | 259 | |||||||||
| 4.6 | RUSH AVG | 5.1 | |||||||||
| 53 | PASS ATT | 27 | |||||||||
| 38 | PASS COMP | 17 | |||||||||
| 412 | PASS YDS | 163 | |||||||||
| 3 | INT THROWN | 1 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 4 | TURNOVERS | 2 | |||||||||
| 5 | PENALTIES | 4 | |||||||||
| 25 | PEN YDS | 35 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| -9 | YDS LOST | -7 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 98 Kentucky | 0 | 14 | 14 | 2 | 30 | ||||||
| 02 Oregon St | 7 | 7 | 0 | 21 | 35 | ||||||
| osu int's a ball off their def chart and converts with a td to go up 14-7 in the 2nd. | |||||||||||
| kent ties it moments later at 14 with a 46 yd dropback pass for a td. | |||||||||||
| with 5:50 to go in the game, Kent goes up 30-28 with a safety, scored on a line plunge vs. blitz call. | |||||||||||
| ore st regains the lead on a 2 yd td pass with 2:50 to go in the game, a 47 yd dbp setup. 35-30 osu. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Pretty evenly matched teams. The turnovers | 98 Kentucky | 02 Oregon St | |||||||||
| naturally were part of the story on this outcome. | 30 | SCORE | 35 | ||||||||
| Kent does not have a fast moving offense, so they | 22 | 1ST DOWNS | 20 | ||||||||
| really could not chunk it down the field in the end. | 413 | TOTAL YDS | 468 | ||||||||
| It all really came down to whether or not Ore St | 21 | RUSH ATT | 37 | ||||||||
| would hit on their long yardage, low comp % | 82 | RUSH YDS | 139 | ||||||||
| passing game, and on their final score, they did. | 3.9 | RUSH AVG | 3.8 | ||||||||
| 63 | PASS ATT | 40 | |||||||||
| 40 | PASS COMP | 22 | |||||||||
| 350 | PASS YDS | 332 | |||||||||
| 3 | INT THROWN | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 4 | TURNOVERS | 1 | |||||||||
| 6 | PENALTIES | 8 | |||||||||
| 29 | PEN YDS | 41 | |||||||||
| 2 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| -19 | YDS LOST | -3 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 94 Penn State | 14 | 20 | 3 | 21 | 58 | ||||||
| 97 Tennessee | 3 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 20 | ||||||
| a 61 yd int ret for a td puts PSU up 24-3 at 9:50 to go in the first half. PS has been too much for the Vols. | |||||||||||
| PSU hits a 67 yd SOP for a td to go up 34-3, 3 min left in the first half. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Two good and fun teams go at it, but the turnovers | 94 Penn State | 97 Tennessee | |||||||||
| by the Vols combined with less than stellar Vol | 58 | SCORE | 20 | ||||||||
| defense for a blowout. PSU played pretty good | 27 | 1ST DOWNS | 22 | ||||||||
| pass defense at times and forced several of the | 550 | TOTAL YDS | 433 | ||||||||
| ints. | 39 | RUSH ATT | 42 | ||||||||
| 211 | RUSH YDS | 220 | |||||||||
| 5.4 | RUSH AVG | 5.2 | |||||||||
| 37 | PASS ATT | 36 | |||||||||
| 23 | PASS COMP | 23 | |||||||||
| 339 | PASS YDS | 220 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 5 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 2 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 7 | |||||||||
| 2 | PENALTIES | 7 | |||||||||
| 10 | PEN YDS | 44 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -7 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 04 Bowling Green | 10 | 17 | 7 | 7 | 41 | ||||||
| 02 Oklahoma | 7 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 35 | ||||||
| ou ties the game at 7 early on, their first int (their def chart) and conversion of the game. | |||||||||||
| bg rushes a td on the board just before ht, after an ou stall just after a bg td, so it stands 27-14 bg at the half. | |||||||||||
| bg strikes early 3rd with a 39 yd int ret for a td, it was 3rd and long, and the int came off the bg def chart. | |||||||||||
| ou answers with a 64 yd td pass (dbp) to make it 34-21 bg. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 04 Bowling Green | 02 Oklahoma | ||||||||||
| The OU defense made more plays as the game | 41 | SCORE | 35 | ||||||||
| went on, although it was a difficult task. BG's defense | 29 | 1ST DOWNS | 21 | ||||||||
| started giving the OU offense plays in the 2nd half. | 538 | TOTAL YDS | 454 | ||||||||
| The key to the game was in the 4th, with OU slowly | 28 | RUSH ATT | 41 | ||||||||
| driving down the fielddown 34-28, they got to about | 124 | RUSH YDS | 177 | ||||||||
| the BG 25 yd line, but were sacked and lost 11 yds, | 4.4 | RUSH AVG | 4.3 | ||||||||
| stalling the drive and taking them out of range for | 56 | PASS ATT | 28 | ||||||||
| a fga or 4th down attempt. This was with about | 41 | PASS COMP | 18 | ||||||||
| 6 minutes left. OU could not in turn stop BG from | 414 | PASS YDS | 299 | ||||||||
| driving slowly down the field, and the Falcons got | 2 | INT THROWN | 2 | ||||||||
| a TD on that drive, sealing the game. | 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | ||||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 2 | |||||||||
| 6 | PENALTIES | 5 | |||||||||
| 52 | PEN YDS | 37 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 2 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -22 | |||||||||
| skipped a game | |||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 97 Ga Tech | 3 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 23 | ||||||
| 05 Texas | 7 | 20 | 9 | 3 | 39 | ||||||
| gt returned opening ko for 96 yds and a td, but called back via OFF 15 | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| The story of this game was simple. Texas has a | 97 Ga Tech | 05 Texas | |||||||||
| defense, GT does not. The difference was really | 23 | SCORE | 39 | ||||||||
| defense, and GT just could not stop Texas, who | 24 | 1ST DOWNS | 24 | ||||||||
| tried plenty hard to stop themselves. 3 of the INTs | 348 | TOTAL YDS | 544 | ||||||||
| were off the Texas chart. GT is very efficient. They | 39 | RUSH ATT | 38 | ||||||||
| missed 2 FGAs today and would have put many | 128 | RUSH YDS | 227 | ||||||||
| more points on the board against an average | 3.3 | RUSH AVG | 6.0 | ||||||||
| defense, but Texas played very well there. Even the | 41 | PASS ATT | 33 | ||||||||
| Texas chart seems to somehow make it look easy | 23 | PASS COMP | 18 | ||||||||
| on offense. But, they were playing GT. | 241 | PASS YDS | 317 | ||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 4 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 0 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 4 | PENALTIES | 14 | |||||||||
| 25 | PEN YDS | 100 | |||||||||
| 3 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -21 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 02 Maryland | 7 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 30 | ||||||
| 99 S Miss | 10 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 32 | ||||||
| S Miss takes a 7 zip lead early, capping on an int (their def chart) and 55 yd return. | |||||||||||
| Maryland gets a 45 yd td run with :40 to go in the 1st, still trailing 10-7. | |||||||||||
| With :10 left, SM kicks a 23 yd fg to win it, 32-30. Great back and forth game, | |||||||||||
| key play was 25 yd dropback pass, out of bounds with no timeouts left, helped by a green 6 by | |||||||||||
| Maryland, that with :30 left in the game. Setup the fga. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Only 2 of the 7 SM ints came off the Terps def | 02 Maryland | 99 S Miss | |||||||||
| chart. Terps did a great job in coming back and | 30 | SCORE | 32 | ||||||||
| heart-breaking for them to just fall short. This | 17 | 1ST DOWNS | 22 | ||||||||
| one a big momentum swinging type of game, | 394 | TOTAL YDS | 490 | ||||||||
| back and forth. | 40 | RUSH ATT | 27 | ||||||||
| 153 | RUSH YDS | 65 | |||||||||
| 3.8 | RUSH AVG | 2.4 | |||||||||
| 34 | PASS ATT | 59 | |||||||||
| 19 | PASS COMP | 31 | |||||||||
| 241 | PASS YDS | 425 | |||||||||
| 3 | INT THROWN | 7 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 4 | TURNOVERS | 7 | |||||||||
| 7 | PENALTIES | 3 | |||||||||
| 40 | PEN YDS | 30 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 03 Ole Miss | 0 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 21 | ||||||
| 03 Georgia | 10 | 7 | 3 | 12 | 32 | ||||||
| Dawgs open scoring with an 80 yd pr for a td, only 1.5 minutes into the game, 7 zip Ga. | |||||||||||
| Ole Miss follows an int (their def chart) with a 4 yd td toss to take their first lead 21-20 with at the 14:20 mark | |||||||||||
| of the 4th. | |||||||||||
| After kicking a fg to take a 23-21 lead, Ga int's a pass (their def chart) and returns it 21 yds to paydirt | |||||||||||
| to extend lead to 30-21, 6:50 to go. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Georgia plays 4 good, solid qtrs of football. | 03 Ole Miss | 03 Georgia | |||||||||
| This was a real good game, as far as realistic | 21 | SCORE | 32 | ||||||||
| interaction. The Dawgs defense played very | 21 | 1ST DOWNS | 16 | ||||||||
| well against the pass. | 314 | TOTAL YDS | 341 | ||||||||
| 31 | RUSH ATT | 36 | |||||||||
| 112 | RUSH YDS | 159 | |||||||||
| 3.6 | RUSH AVG | 4.4 | |||||||||
| 52 | PASS ATT | 40 | |||||||||
| 25 | PASS COMP | 18 | |||||||||
| 209 | PASS YDS | 200 | |||||||||
| 3 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 2 | FUM LOST | 2 | |||||||||
| 5 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 7 | PENALTIES | 9 | |||||||||
| 45 | PEN YDS | 54 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 2 | |||||||||
| -7 | YDS LOST | -18 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 99 Minnesota | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | ||||||
| 94 Colorado | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 14 | ||||||
| A 44 yd run sets up an 8 yd td run for Col, who takes a 7-3 lead, 12:50 in the 3rd. | |||||||||||
| Col NGs a FGA from only 20 yds, 2nd they've missed today, 7-6 Col 3:40 in the 3rd. | |||||||||||
| Col gets a 6 yd td run with 3:20 to go in the game to take a 14-9 lead in this surprisingly | |||||||||||
| low scoring game. Two long runs were key. Col making lots of long runs, keeping them going. | |||||||||||
| Minn runs out of time on the Col 31. They threw 4 straight inc dbps to end it. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 99 Minnesota | 94 Colorado | ||||||||||
| Hard to believe this was this low scoring. Clean | 9 | SCORE | 14 | ||||||||
| game by both teams and defenses made the | 22 | 1ST DOWNS | 20 | ||||||||
| plays they needed to. The long run was the key | 385 | TOTAL YDS | 433 | ||||||||
| to the game, and those belonged to Col. Poor FG | 52 | RUSH ATT | 50 | ||||||||
| kicking for Col and good FG kicking for Minn almost | 277 | RUSH YDS | 376 | ||||||||
| cost the Buffs this one. | 5.3 | RUSH AVG | 7.5 | ||||||||
| Col had 7 runs of 20+ yards, totalling 212 yds. | 23 | PASS ATT | 17 | ||||||||
| 11 | PASS COMP | 7 | |||||||||
| 116 | PASS YDS | 61 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | TURNOVERS | 0 | |||||||||
| 6 | PENALTIES | 7 | |||||||||
| 38 | PEN YDS | 35 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| -8 | YDS LOST | -4 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 05 UCLA | 7 | 0 | 14 | 10 | 31 | ||||||
| 94 Wash State | 0 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 27 | ||||||
| with 8 min to go in the 3rd, ucla regains the lead 21-17 with a 23 yd fum ret for a td on wsu kor. | |||||||||||
| wsu retakes the lead 24-21, 7:40 to go in the game, off an int (their def chart) | |||||||||||
| wsu hits a 25 yd fg, exactly, to lead 27-24 with :20 left. Just no D for ucla | |||||||||||
| holy cow, ensuing ko, ucla takes it 98 yds for a td, now leads 31-27, just :10 left. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| WSU has a good defense and showed it, UCLA | 05 UCLA | 94 Wash State | |||||||||
| has a bad defense and showed it. But, UCLA | 31 | SCORE | 27 | ||||||||
| destroyed WS with special teams returns all day. | 17 | 1ST DOWNS | 32 | ||||||||
| 326 | TOTAL YDS | 553 | |||||||||
| 37 | RUSH ATT | 42 | |||||||||
| 120 | RUSH YDS | 241 | |||||||||
| 3.2 | RUSH AVG | 5.7 | |||||||||
| 27 | PASS ATT | 40 | |||||||||
| 18 | PASS COMP | 26 | |||||||||
| 206 | PASS YDS | 325 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 2 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 10 | PENALTIES | 5 | |||||||||
| 78 | PEN YDS | 43 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 3 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -13 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 94 Michigan | 3 | 7 | 7 | 19 | 36 | ||||||
| 02 Penn State | 3 | 9 | 0 | 14 | 26 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 94 Michigan | 02 Penn State | ||||||||||
| Tight ball game until midway thru the 4th, where | 36 | SCORE | 26 | ||||||||
| the game really fell apart. Stats tell the story, but | 22 | 1ST DOWNS | 23 | ||||||||
| the game was only so-so in intensity and flow. | 401 | TOTAL YDS | 492 | ||||||||
| PSU missed 3 FGAs in the first 3 qtrs. I felt both | 37 | RUSH ATT | 42 | ||||||||
| teams should have run more. | 163 | RUSH YDS | 183 | ||||||||
| 4.4 | RUSH AVG | 4.4 | |||||||||
| 32 | PASS ATT | 43 | |||||||||
| 21 | PASS COMP | 26 | |||||||||
| 245 | PASS YDS | 312 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 4 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 1 | TURNOVERS | 5 | |||||||||
| 3 | PENALTIES | 8 | |||||||||
| 25 | PEN YDS | 54 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| -7 | YDS LOST | -3 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 94 Texas A&M | 3 | 7 | 7 | 13 | 30 | ||||||
| 98 Wisconsin | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 16 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Wisconsin did not fare well. Down the stretch, | 94 Texas A&M | 98 Wisconsin | |||||||||
| the Aggies proved unstoppable for Wis. And, | 30 | SCORE | 16 | ||||||||
| the Badgers passed very poorly, something I | 24 | 1ST DOWNS | 15 | ||||||||
| am quite surprised by. | 379 | TOTAL YDS | 244 | ||||||||
| 44 | RUSH ATT | 43 | |||||||||
| 175 | RUSH YDS | 158 | |||||||||
| 4.0 | RUSH AVG | 3.7 | |||||||||
| 31 | PASS ATT | 20 | |||||||||
| 23 | PASS COMP | 7 | |||||||||
| 211 | PASS YDS | 92 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 1 | TURNOVERS | 1 | |||||||||
| 11 | PENALTIES | 5 | |||||||||
| 78 | PEN YDS | 36 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| -7 | YDS LOST | -6 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 97 LSU | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 26 | ||||||
| 05 Alabama | 7 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 28 | ||||||
| amazing finish, Bama got 17 yd dbp (exactly) on last play of the game vs. a PPL defense to win | |||||||||||
| it 28-26, LSU missed 2 xps in the game. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| It'd be hard to beat this one. One of my best games. | 97 LSU | 05 Alabama | |||||||||
| Not much way to expand upon it, just a very good | 26 | SCORE | 28 | ||||||||
| tight game the whole way. | 21 | 1ST DOWNS | 23 | ||||||||
| 363 | TOTAL YDS | 414 | |||||||||
| 44 | RUSH ATT | 41 | |||||||||
| 216 | RUSH YDS | 186 | |||||||||
| 4.9 | RUSH AVG | 4.5 | |||||||||
| 30 | PASS ATT | 41 | |||||||||
| 18 | PASS COMP | 20 | |||||||||
| 157 | PASS YDS | 241 | |||||||||
| 2 | INT THROWN | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 1 | |||||||||
| 2 | PENALTIES | 11 | |||||||||
| 18 | PEN YDS | 95 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 4 | |||||||||
| -10 | YDS LOST | -13 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 05 Texas Tech | 7 | 10 | 7 | 14 | 38 | ||||||
| 01 Oregon | 17 | 3 | 14 | 7 | 41 | ||||||
| Ore returns a punt 75 yds for a td to go up 17-7 at the end of the 1st. Ore has had 3 very long punt ret | |||||||||||
| and a 76 yd kor so far. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| I don't think I have ever seen a team stay | 05 Texas Tech | 01 Oregon | |||||||||
| in a game with returns so much as Oregon | 38 | SCORE | 41 | ||||||||
| did in this one. It was amazing, all game long. | 27 | 1ST DOWNS | 21 | ||||||||
| They literally picked up hundreds of yds | 540 | TOTAL YDS | 348 | ||||||||
| on kor and prs. The INT's destroyed TT. | 23 | RUSH ATT | 45 | ||||||||
| 102 | RUSH YDS | 189 | |||||||||
| 4.4 | RUSH AVG | 4.2 | |||||||||
| 59 | PASS ATT | 32 | |||||||||
| 34 | PASS COMP | 16 | |||||||||
| 461 | PASS YDS | 159 | |||||||||
| 4 | INT THROWN | 1 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 5 | TURNOVERS | 1 | |||||||||
| 9 | PENALTIES | 8 | |||||||||
| 65 | PEN YDS | 56 | |||||||||
| 3 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -23 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 96 FSU | 0 | 3 | 7 | 24 | 34 | ||||||
| 05 USC | 16 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 35 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 96 FSU | 05 USC | ||||||||||
| Truly an unbelievable game. It wasn't such a | 34 | SCORE | 35 | ||||||||
| good game for most of the way. USC dominated | 19 | 1ST DOWNS | 20 | ||||||||
| FSU early on, as the Noles offense really sputtered | 403 | TOTAL YDS | 418 | ||||||||
| thru the first half. Also, FSU really did little to | 33 | RUSH ATT | 47 | ||||||||
| stop USC until the 4th qtr. FSU has a great defense, | 159 | RUSH YDS | 213 | ||||||||
| but they made few plays today. The ending was | 4.8 | RUSH AVG | 4.5 | ||||||||
| incredible. FSU was making a 4th qtr run, but | 35 | PASS ATT | 30 | ||||||||
| down 29-20 with less than 3 min to go. They managed | 18 | PASS COMP | 19 | ||||||||
| to throw passes and score without calling any | 253 | PASS YDS | 231 | ||||||||
| timeouts to make it 29-27, with less than 2 min left. | 5 | INT THROWN | 2 | ||||||||
| FSU got the onside kick, but threw an int, (USC def | 0 | FUM LOST | 0 | ||||||||
| chart). Then, with all their timeouts, FSU stuffed | 5 | TURNOVERS | 2 | ||||||||
| SC and got the ball back via punt on their own 14. | 11 | PENALTIES | 11 | ||||||||
| On their first play, they rolled a TD (19 roll) for an | 101 | PEN YDS | 75 | ||||||||
| 86 yard td pass to take a 34-29 lead over the now | 1 | SACKED | 3 | ||||||||
| heartbroken Trojans. We have seen all this before | -9 | YDS LOST | -26 | ||||||||
| in other games. But, this time USC returned the | |||||||||||
| kickoff to their 49. There was only :20 left though. | |||||||||||
| USC completed a dropback for 20 yards. They are | |||||||||||
| on the FSU 31. Last play of the game, … and USC | |||||||||||
| rolls a TD of their own on their dropback, for a 31 | |||||||||||
| yard td pass to win it 35-34 on the game's last play. | |||||||||||
| This highly anticipated matchup was dull for a while | |||||||||||
| and FSU was not providing their part. But in the end | |||||||||||
| this was probably my best finish ever. | |||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 94 BC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | ||||||
| 95 Nebraska | 7 | 14 | 0 | 6 | 27 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Very solid game for the Husker D. Not overly | 94 BC | 95 Nebraska | |||||||||
| impressive game for the NU offense. They ripped | 3 | SCORE | 27 | ||||||||
| one very long td run on the option. But, Nebraska | 13 | 1ST DOWNS | 22 | ||||||||
| was only so-so much of the day offensively. BC | 263 | TOTAL YDS | 388 | ||||||||
| has plenty of red boxes vs. the option and called | 26 | RUSH ATT | 66 | ||||||||
| a good game defensively. But they lack stopping | 24 | RUSH YDS | 323 | ||||||||
| power on the option specifically, yet Nebraska did | 0.9 | RUSH AVG | 4.9 | ||||||||
| not do well with the option. | 35 | PASS ATT | 18 | ||||||||
| 19 | PASS COMP | 6 | |||||||||
| 239 | PASS YDS | 70 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 0 | |||||||||
| 6 | PENALTIES | 3 | |||||||||
| 32 | PEN YDS | 25 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -5 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 49 Oklahoma | 10 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 52 | ||||||
| 04 Minnesota | 0 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 17 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| No surprises. | 49 Oklahoma | 04 Minnesota | |||||||||
| 52 | SCORE | 17 | |||||||||
| 25 | 1ST DOWNS | 17 | |||||||||
| 535 | TOTAL YDS | 331 | |||||||||
| 61 | RUSH ATT | 34 | |||||||||
| 355 | RUSH YDS | 135 | |||||||||
| 5.8 | RUSH AVG | 4.0 | |||||||||
| 19 | PASS ATT | 36 | |||||||||
| 11 | PASS COMP | 15 | |||||||||
| 186 | PASS YDS | 201 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 1 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 1 | TURNOVERS | 2 | |||||||||
| 4 | PENALTIES | 4 | |||||||||
| 21 | PEN YDS | 25 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 2 | |||||||||
| -6 | YDS LOST | -5 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 94 Arizona | 7 | 9 | 3 | 14 | 33 | ||||||
| 95 Florida | 14 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 35 | ||||||
| After some great defensive plays by the Gators, Arizona hits a long pass to put them on the Florida | |||||||||||
| 27, but there are now only 10 seconds left. Arizona has to try the 44 yd FGA, but misses and Florida wins. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 94 Arizona | 95 Florida | ||||||||||
| The Gator offense was not impressive, but they | 33 | SCORE | 35 | ||||||||
| did what they had to do, especially in scoring | 19 | 1ST DOWNS | 13 | ||||||||
| range. A weird game. Arizona played FG football | 345 | TOTAL YDS | 266 | ||||||||
| too long, scoring more times than Florida. The Gators | 37 | RUSH ATT | 32 | ||||||||
| are fortunate to overcome the turnovers, half the INTs | 136 | RUSH YDS | 132 | ||||||||
| coming off the Arizona def chart. Arizona scored on | 3.7 | RUSH AVG | 4.1 | ||||||||
| one INT ret, Florida on 2, which it could be said | 50 | PASS ATT | 34 | ||||||||
| was the difference. | 24 | PASS COMP | 15 | ||||||||
| 219 | PASS YDS | 146 | |||||||||
| 2 | INT THROWN | 7 | |||||||||
| 2 | FUM LOST | 2 | |||||||||
| 4 | TURNOVERS | 9 | |||||||||
| 10 | PENALTIES | 9 | |||||||||
| 62 | PEN YDS | 61 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 2 | |||||||||
| -10 | YDS LOST | -12 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 02 USC | 7 | 20 | 7 | 10 | 44 | ||||||
| 05 Notre Dame | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 10 | ||||||
| In the 2nd, USC gets a 91 yd pr for a td, misses the pat. They are up 13-3 right now. The USC defense | |||||||||||
| just made some big stops vs. ND to force that FG. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| USC has a defense, ND does not. ND ran a string | 02 USC | 05 Notre Dame | |||||||||
| of INTs most of them off USC's chart. | 44 | SCORE | 10 | ||||||||
| USC made all the important plays. | 23 | 1ST DOWNS | 24 | ||||||||
| 467 | TOTAL YDS | 366 | |||||||||
| 34 | RUSH ATT | 17 | |||||||||
| 146 | RUSH YDS | 71 | |||||||||
| 4.3 | RUSH AVG | 4.2 | |||||||||
| 45 | PASS ATT | 61 | |||||||||
| 29 | PASS COMP | 34 | |||||||||
| 338 | PASS YDS | 307 | |||||||||
| 3 | INT THROWN | 6 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 7 | |||||||||
| 7 | PENALTIES | 9 | |||||||||
| 61 | PEN YDS | 70 | |||||||||
| 2 | SACKED | 2 | |||||||||
| -17 | YDS LOST | -12 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 98 Central Fla | 0 | 14 | 7 | 6 | 27 | ||||||
| 02 Iowa | 7 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 31 | ||||||
| CF missed 2 FGAs less than 30 yds in the first half. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 98 Central Fla | 02 Iowa | ||||||||||
| An excellent football game. Things got a little | 27 | SCORE | 31 | ||||||||
| penalty crazy in the 2nd half. But, this game had | 25 | 1ST DOWNS | 27 | ||||||||
| it all, great pace, momentum swings, and solid | 448 | TOTAL YDS | 501 | ||||||||
| display of these teams' personalities. | 29 | RUSH ATT | 57 | ||||||||
| CF held their own and proved they can play with | 130 | RUSH YDS | 343 | ||||||||
| the big boys. Iowa is more catered towards defending | 4.5 | RUSH AVG | 6.0 | ||||||||
| a running team. | 50 | PASS ATT | 21 | ||||||||
| 31 | PASS COMP | 13 | |||||||||
| 343 | PASS YDS | 158 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 0 | |||||||||
| 2 | FUM LOST | 2 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 2 | |||||||||
| 8 | PENALTIES | 10 | |||||||||
| 55 | PEN YDS | 80 | |||||||||
| 4 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -25 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 02 Miami | 7 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 20 | ||||||
| 95 Ohio State | 10 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 27 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Very good ball game. OSU dominated the | 02 Miami | 95 Ohio State | |||||||||
| first half. The Canes edged OSU in the 2nd. | 20 | SCORE | 27 | ||||||||
| The running games were the story today, both | 22 | 1ST DOWNS | 22 | ||||||||
| team's life-blood. The INTs did in Miami. | 426 | TOTAL YDS | 412 | ||||||||
| Long runs dictated things for Miami in the 2nd | 39 | RUSH ATT | 44 | ||||||||
| half, and literally carried them, almost to a comeback. | 275 | RUSH YDS | 273 | ||||||||
| But, OSU was too tough up the middle on their | 7.1 | RUSH AVG | 6.2 | ||||||||
| ground game for this Cane defense. | 34 | PASS ATT | 42 | ||||||||
| It was a good matchup of high calibre and styles | 14 | PASS COMP | 22 | ||||||||
| played in big today. Miami killed the OSU screen, | 155 | PASS YDS | 161 | ||||||||
| but that inside ground game is just not what they | 5 | INT THROWN | 1 | ||||||||
| are good at stopping. | 0 | FUM LOST | 2 | ||||||||
| 5 | TURNOVERS | 3 | |||||||||
| 4 | PENALTIES | 6 | |||||||||
| 30 | PEN YDS | 43 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 3 | |||||||||
| -4 | YDS LOST | -22 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 94 Indiana | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 27 | ||||||
| 02 Ohio State | 7 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 30 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| OSU tried all day to shake Indiana, but could not. | 94 Indiana | 02 Ohio State | |||||||||
| The Hoosiers passing game was just flat ON when | 27 | SCORE | 30 | ||||||||
| they went to it. Befitting of how this game went, | 19 | 1ST DOWNS | 24 | ||||||||
| it was the Buckeye defense that brings it home | 416 | TOTAL YDS | 394 | ||||||||
| with an INT (their def chart) inside their 20 going | 42 | RUSH ATT | 59 | ||||||||
| in the game's waning moments. | 172 | RUSH YDS | 308 | ||||||||
| 4.1 | RUSH AVG | 5.2 | |||||||||
| 22 | PASS ATT | 17 | |||||||||
| 19 | PASS COMP | 10 | |||||||||
| 247 | PASS YDS | 86 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 1 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 1 | |||||||||
| 9 | PENALTIES | 6 | |||||||||
| 70 | PEN YDS | 39 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -3 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 97 UNC | 7 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 19 | ||||||
| 95 N'western | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 13 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 97 UNC | 95 N'western | ||||||||||
| Tremendous football game. NW scored on a 90 | 19 | SCORE | 13 | ||||||||
| yd punt return, as their only td, in the first. UNC | 20 | 1ST DOWNS | 19 | ||||||||
| played a custom offense, a balanced base offense | 296 | TOTAL YDS | 252 | ||||||||
| with an adjusted slant towards their option. It | 35 | RUSH ATT | 39 | ||||||||
| seemed to work well. UNCs QB scrambled very | 113 | RUSH YDS | 124 | ||||||||
| well. The 2nd half belonged to these 2 fine | 3.2 | RUSH AVG | 3.2 | ||||||||
| defenses. UNC especially played great defense. | 44 | PASS ATT | 40 | ||||||||
| Play after play, NW would get good gainers | 22 | PASS COMP | 20 | ||||||||
| taken away from them. The end was fantastic, | 183 | PASS YDS | 148 | ||||||||
| NW completed a dropback to get to the UNC 2 yd | 1 | INT THROWN | 2 | ||||||||
| line, (UNC had a red -3 or it would have been | 2 | FUM LOST | 0 | ||||||||
| a td and NW win). Then on the game's last | 3 | TURNOVERS | 2 | ||||||||
| play, NW throws an SOP inc, and UNC wins. | 4 | PENALTIES | 8 | ||||||||
| 22 | PEN YDS | 60 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 2 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -20 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 02 Kansas St | 3 | 13 | 7 | 13 | 36 | ||||||
| 04 New Mexico | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 02 Kansas St | 04 New Mexico | ||||||||||
| NM actually hung in there real well, just not too | 36 | SCORE | 14 | ||||||||
| well on the scoreboard. They got a 76 yd QR for | 24 | 1ST DOWNS | 8 | ||||||||
| a td. KS is obviously just too strong for NM, but I | 476 | TOTAL YDS | 293 | ||||||||
| think NM would beat a lot of middies. | 65 | RUSH ATT | 41 | ||||||||
| 329 | RUSH YDS | 174 | |||||||||
| 5.1 | RUSH AVG | 4.2 | |||||||||
| 14 | PASS ATT | 26 | |||||||||
| 8 | PASS COMP | 9 | |||||||||
| 156 | PASS YDS | 119 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 4 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 4 | TURNOVERS | 2 | |||||||||
| 5 | PENALTIES | 9 | |||||||||
| 40 | PEN YDS | 65 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -9 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 96 Wyoming | 0 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 21 | ||||||
| 04 U Conn | 6 | 9 | 10 | 34 | 59 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| The int's mounted for Wyoming in the 4th. UC | 96 Wyoming | 04 U Conn | |||||||||
| returned 2 in a row for long td returns in the | 21 | SCORE | 59 | ||||||||
| 4th. | 27 | 1ST DOWNS | 26 | ||||||||
| 482 | TOTAL YDS | 569 | |||||||||
| 22 | RUSH ATT | 29 | |||||||||
| 125 | RUSH YDS | 138 | |||||||||
| 5.7 | RUSH AVG | 4.8 | |||||||||
| 64 | PASS ATT | 52 | |||||||||
| 32 | PASS COMP | 39 | |||||||||
| 365 | PASS YDS | 431 | |||||||||
| 7 | INT THROWN | 0 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 7 | TURNOVERS | 0 | |||||||||
| 4 | PENALTIES | 6 | |||||||||
| 24 | PEN YDS | 40 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -8 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 24 Notre Dame | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 26 | ||||||
| 96 Syracuse | 0 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 23 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 24 Notre Dame | 96 Syracuse | ||||||||||
| A terrible game for the longest time, Syr started | 26 | SCORE | 23 | ||||||||
| clicking with their passing game. ND holds on to | 17 | 1ST DOWNS | 10 | ||||||||
| win it, but it just wasn't fun. The Cuse offense was | 286 | TOTAL YDS | 236 | ||||||||
| horrible for most of the game. | 68 | RUSH ATT | 34 | ||||||||
| 260 | RUSH YDS | 61 | |||||||||
| 3.8 | RUSH AVG | 1.8 | |||||||||
| 9 | PASS ATT | 33 | |||||||||
| 4 | PASS COMP | 13 | |||||||||
| 26 | PASS YDS | 181 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 6 | |||||||||
| 3 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 7 | |||||||||
| 6 | PENALTIES | 6 | |||||||||
| 37 | PEN YDS | 56 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -6 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 02 Virginia | 7 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 35 | ||||||
| 00 Va Tech | 0 | 21 | 7 | 10 | 38 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| About as even as the score indicates, and not | 02 Virginia | 00 Va Tech | |||||||||
| terribly interesting. Va got the boost of a 70+yd | 35 | SCORE | 38 | ||||||||
| pr for a td, and VT missed 2 very makable FGAs. | 25 | 1ST DOWNS | 29 | ||||||||
| 370 | TOTAL YDS | 558 | |||||||||
| 20 | RUSH ATT | 60 | |||||||||
| 73 | RUSH YDS | 383 | |||||||||
| 3.7 | RUSH AVG | 6.4 | |||||||||
| 46 | PASS ATT | 19 | |||||||||
| 34 | PASS COMP | 11 | |||||||||
| 321 | PASS YDS | 175 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 1 | |||||||||
| 4 | PENALTIES | 6 | |||||||||
| 33 | PEN YDS | 40 | |||||||||
| 6 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -24 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 03 Purdue | 3 | 7 | 0 | 12 | 22 | ||||||
| 02 Wash St | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Very good game. Defenses controlled the game, | 03 Purdue | 02 Wash St | |||||||||
| but as it went on, Purdue took over. The football | 22 | SCORE | 7 | ||||||||
| itself was really fun to watch. Purdue won the | 19 | 1ST DOWNS | 14 | ||||||||
| field position battle, and just played really good | 358 | TOTAL YDS | 230 | ||||||||
| defense. | 50 | RUSH ATT | 21 | ||||||||
| 262 | RUSH YDS | 66 | |||||||||
| 5.2 | RUSH AVG | 3.1 | |||||||||
| 29 | PASS ATT | 46 | |||||||||
| 12 | PASS COMP | 21 | |||||||||
| 101 | PASS YDS | 213 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 3 | |||||||||
| 2 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 6 | PENALTIES | 10 | |||||||||
| 35 | PEN YDS | 62 | |||||||||
| 2 | SACKED | 6 | |||||||||
| -5 | YDS LOST | -49 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 02 Texas | 3 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 20 | ||||||
| 01 Nebraska | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 26 | ||||||
| Horns rip a 64 yd pr for td, 12:40 mark of 2nd, 13-10 NU. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 02 Texas | 01 Nebraska | ||||||||||
| Good game, both teams showed their style. Texas | 20 | SCORE | 26 | ||||||||
| had real problems with the NU running game. | 18 | 1ST DOWNS | 17 | ||||||||
| Nebraska's pass defense is extremely good, and it | 290 | TOTAL YDS | 426 | ||||||||
| was just a tough matchup for the Texas chart. | 43 | RUSH ATT | 58 | ||||||||
| NU missed 2 extra points, and a FG that would have | 140 | RUSH YDS | 369 | ||||||||
| put it away in the end. The NU defense really shut | 3.3 | RUSH AVG | 6.4 | ||||||||
| down the Horns in their comeback attempt late. | 32 | PASS ATT | 8 | ||||||||
| 14 | PASS COMP | 5 | |||||||||
| 153 | PASS YDS | 59 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | TURNOVERS | 1 | |||||||||
| 7 | PENALTIES | 10 | |||||||||
| 50 | PEN YDS | 75 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| -3 | YDS LOST | -2 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 05 West Va | 14 | 3 | 7 | 13 | 37 | ||||||
| 01 Tennessee | 7 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 23 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| WV was expected to be impressive offensively, and | 05 West Va | 01 Tennessee | |||||||||
| they are. Great QB running and just tough to defend. | 37 | SCORE | 23 | ||||||||
| WV had a long INT return for a TD to help ice it. | 20 | 1ST DOWNS | 18 | ||||||||
| The Vols hung around and had some opportunities, | 432 | TOTAL YDS | 347 | ||||||||
| but turnovers got them. | 54 | RUSH ATT | 32 | ||||||||
| 300 | RUSH YDS | 124 | |||||||||
| 5.6 | RUSH AVG | 3.9 | |||||||||
| 16 | PASS ATT | 35 | |||||||||
| 13 | PASS COMP | 19 | |||||||||
| 139 | PASS YDS | 223 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 3 | |||||||||
| 2 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 8 | PENALTIES | 5 | |||||||||
| 49 | PEN YDS | 45 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -7 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 97 Purdue | 0 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 21 | ||||||
| 96 Washington | 17 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 34 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Wash is way too powerful for Purdue. Purdue | 97 Purdue | 96 Washington | |||||||||
| really gave up a lot of plays defensively. Also, | 21 | SCORE | 34 | ||||||||
| Purdue passed very poorly at time, just self | 23 | 1ST DOWNS | 25 | ||||||||
| destructing, which surprised me. | 405 | TOTAL YDS | 482 | ||||||||
| 23 | RUSH ATT | 53 | |||||||||
| 151 | RUSH YDS | 299 | |||||||||
| 6.6 | RUSH AVG | 5.6 | |||||||||
| 53 | PASS ATT | 31 | |||||||||
| 23 | PASS COMP | 12 | |||||||||
| 266 | PASS YDS | 194 | |||||||||
| 3 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 2 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 5 | TURNOVERS | 3 | |||||||||
| 7 | PENALTIES | 10 | |||||||||
| 41 | PEN YDS | 70 | |||||||||
| 2 | SACKED | 2 | |||||||||
| -12 | YDS LOST | -11 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | |||||||
| 04 Va Tech | 14 | 3 | 17 | 3 | 37 | ||||||
| 01 Florida | 0 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 20 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 04 Va Tech | 01 Florida | ||||||||||
| Very good defense for VT, very clean game for | 37 | SCORE | 20 | ||||||||
| them. Made it look easy. | 18 | 1ST DOWNS | 19 | ||||||||
| 338 | TOTAL YDS | 330 | |||||||||
| 51 | RUSH ATT | 26 | |||||||||
| 180 | RUSH YDS | 68 | |||||||||
| 3.5 | RUSH AVG | 2.6 | |||||||||
| 25 | PASS ATT | 47 | |||||||||
| 13 | PASS COMP | 25 | |||||||||
| 158 | PASS YDS | 265 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 4 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | TURNOVERS | 5 | |||||||||
| 10 | PENALTIES | 10 | |||||||||
| 78 | PEN YDS | 70 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -3 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 02 NC State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | ||||||
| 02 Oregon St | 7 | 14 | 3 | 7 | 31 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Hot passing for OS and good downfield passing | 02 NC State | 02 Oregon St | |||||||||
| overcomes a lot of strong defense from the Pack, | 7 | SCORE | 31 | ||||||||
| and the Beavers dominate the game. Excellent | 15 | 1ST DOWNS | 22 | ||||||||
| defense from OS, and they shut down NCSU. | 242 | TOTAL YDS | 435 | ||||||||
| State had an off day passing to add to the blowout. | 22 | RUSH ATT | 42 | ||||||||
| 39 | RUSH YDS | 176 | |||||||||
| 1.8 | RUSH AVG | 4.2 | |||||||||
| 53 | PASS ATT | 39 | |||||||||
| 22 | PASS COMP | 27 | |||||||||
| 211 | PASS YDS | 264 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 0 | |||||||||
| 2 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 1 | |||||||||
| 9 | PENALTIES | 11 | |||||||||
| 56 | PEN YDS | 77 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| -8 | YDS LOST | -5 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 94 Penn State | 7 | 17 | 10 | 24 | 58 | ||||||
| 04 Bowling Green | 3 | 14 | 10 | 7 | 34 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 94 Penn State | 04 Bowling Green | ||||||||||
| How about that? | 58 | SCORE | 34 | ||||||||
| 37 | 1ST DOWNS | 27 | |||||||||
| 690 | TOTAL YDS | 487 | |||||||||
| 51 | RUSH ATT | 24 | |||||||||
| 305 | RUSH YDS | 82 | |||||||||
| 6.0 | RUSH AVG | 3.4 | |||||||||
| 36 | PASS ATT | 54 | |||||||||
| 25 | PASS COMP | 34 | |||||||||
| 385 | PASS YDS | 410 | |||||||||
| 4 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 4 | TURNOVERS | 3 | |||||||||
| 4 | PENALTIES | 6 | |||||||||
| 24 | PEN YDS | 43 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -5 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 99 Southern Miss | 6 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 20 | ||||||
| 05 Texas | 0 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 31 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Tough game. The Texas defense was largely | 99 Southern Miss | 05 Texas | |||||||||
| the reason this game slowly but surely leaned | 20 | SCORE | 31 | ||||||||
| to Texas. They really did well against the run and | 21 | 1ST DOWNS | 15 | ||||||||
| pass, taking yds off almost every play. SM really | 324 | TOTAL YDS | 313 | ||||||||
| had a couple of opps to take the game back and | 38 | RUSH ATT | 43 | ||||||||
| made turnovers. Texas was not impressive, but then | 104 | RUSH YDS | 68 | ||||||||
| again, its like they turn it on when they need to, | 2.7 | RUSH AVG | 1.6 | ||||||||
| stay calm, and just get it done. Young very poor | 37 | PASS ATT | 25 | ||||||||
| start and the Horns did not pass much at times. But, | 24 | PASS COMP | 19 | ||||||||
| they got it going and so did Vince. The SM run | 225 | PASS YDS | 245 | ||||||||
| defense was suffocating. Just incredible really. Texas | 2 | INT THROWN | 2 | ||||||||
| had a few very nice punt returns which were important. | 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | ||||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 2 | |||||||||
| 2 | PENALTIES | 10 | |||||||||
| 10 | PEN YDS | 60 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -5 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 03 Georgia | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | ||||||
| 94 Colorado | 0 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 17 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 03 Georgia | 94 Colorado | ||||||||||
| Ga races the clock at the end and moves it well, | 13 | SCORE | 17 | ||||||||
| but completes a 15 yd dbp, to the Col 1 yd line, | 14 | 1ST DOWNS | 21 | ||||||||
| on the very last play. Great finish. (No def adj on | 244 | TOTAL YDS | 457 | ||||||||
| the final play). Sluggish game play at times. Ga | 29 | RUSH ATT | 58 | ||||||||
| dominated early, and played good D overall. But, | 51 | RUSH YDS | 337 | ||||||||
| the Buffs offense made plays for the next 2 qtrs. | 1.8 | RUSH AVG | 5.8 | ||||||||
| The 4th was a stalemate, with that great finish. | 40 | PASS ATT | 30 | ||||||||
| 16 | PASS COMP | 11 | |||||||||
| 193 | PASS YDS | 120 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 0 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | TURNOVERS | 2 | |||||||||
| 9 | PENALTIES | 4 | |||||||||
| 70 | PEN YDS | 35 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 05 UCLA | 7 | 10 | 14 | 7 | 38 | ||||||
| 94 Michigan | 10 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 41 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 05 UCLA | 94 Michigan | ||||||||||
| Plenty of offense. Mich takes advantage of UCLAs | 38 | SCORE | 41 | ||||||||
| horrific run D and overcomes two punt returns | 21 | 1ST DOWNS | 33 | ||||||||
| for TDs by UCLA in the 3rd. | 431 | TOTAL YDS | 638 | ||||||||
| 26 | RUSH ATT | 55 | |||||||||
| 119 | RUSH YDS | 411 | |||||||||
| 4.6 | RUSH AVG | 7.5 | |||||||||
| 43 | PASS ATT | 29 | |||||||||
| 29 | PASS COMP | 17 | |||||||||
| 339 | PASS YDS | 227 | |||||||||
| 2 | INT THROWN | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 2 | |||||||||
| 4 | PENALTIES | 12 | |||||||||
| 24 | PEN YDS | 90 | |||||||||
| 4 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -27 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 94 Texas A&M | 7 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 33 | ||||||
| 05 Alabama | 3 | 0 | 10 | 7 | 20 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 94 Texas A&M | 05 Alabama | ||||||||||
| Big heart from Bama today, but not enough. It was | 33 | SCORE | 20 | ||||||||
| 27-20 Aggies and in the last 2.5 minutes, Bama | 17 | 1ST DOWNS | 23 | ||||||||
| had it on the A&M 9, but went out on downs, | 331 | TOTAL YDS | 369 | ||||||||
| then got the ball back and threw int their off chart, | 36 | RUSH ATT | 46 | ||||||||
| which was returned for td. Very good game. A&M | 202 | RUSH YDS | 141 | ||||||||
| was too much for the Tide, as it was their ability | 5.6 | RUSH AVG | 3.1 | ||||||||
| to be dangerous at so many different aspects, they | 20 | PASS ATT | 39 | ||||||||
| were just too complete. | 10 | PASS COMP | 21 | ||||||||
| Aggies blitzed all day, and it was effective. | 129 | PASS YDS | 262 | ||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 3 | |||||||||
| 3 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 5 | PENALTIES | 9 | |||||||||
| 43 | PEN YDS | 51 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 3 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -34 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 01 Oregon | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 10 | ||||||
| 05 USC | 7 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 27 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Ducks were very much in this game. Shaky day | 01 Oregon | 05 USC | |||||||||
| passing for USC, but the Oregon offense just did | 10 | SCORE | 27 | ||||||||
| not make plays in the 2nd half. The defense for USC | 25 | 1ST DOWNS | 20 | ||||||||
| actually stepped up a made some plays in the 2nd | 386 | TOTAL YDS | 430 | ||||||||
| half to sway the game to the Trojans, and eventually | 42 | RUSH ATT | 40 | ||||||||
| their offense took control. | 198 | RUSH YDS | 230 | ||||||||
| Punt returns heavily favored USC. | 4.7 | RUSH AVG | 5.8 | ||||||||
| 37 | PASS ATT | 35 | |||||||||
| 20 | PASS COMP | 16 | |||||||||
| 188 | PASS YDS | 200 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 2 | |||||||||
| 9 | PENALTIES | 4 | |||||||||
| 57 | PEN YDS | 45 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 95 Nebraska | 3 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 27 | ||||||
| 49 Oklahoma | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| A terrific game between terrific teams. The only | 95 Nebraska | 49 Oklahoma | |||||||||
| thing keeping it from being a greatest ever was | 27 | SCORE | 14 | ||||||||
| that it did not get close in the end. NU played | 19 | 1ST DOWNS | 21 | ||||||||
| extremely well, and was given the advantage | 352 | TOTAL YDS | 364 | ||||||||
| of their defense stacking against the OU ground | 54 | RUSH ATT | 59 | ||||||||
| game, yet OU remained balanced. The Huskers | 251 | RUSH YDS | 269 | ||||||||
| did well with all parts of their game. Frazier took | 4.6 | RUSH AVG | 4.6 | ||||||||
| over at one point with timely passing and a QR for | 14 | PASS ATT | 16 | ||||||||
| a TD (27 yds). This was a good display of the power | 7 | PASS COMP | 6 | ||||||||
| of this NU chart. NU does a better job of holding onto | 101 | PASS YDS | 101 | ||||||||
| the football, and that came out as well. NU returned | 0 | INT THROWN | 1 | ||||||||
| one Sooner fumble 78 yds for a | 1 | FUM LOST | 2 | ||||||||
| TD. Very even game otherwise. | 1 | TURNOVERS | 3 | ||||||||
| Another big play was on the last play of the first | 7 | PENALTIES | 7 | ||||||||
| half, OU threw a dbp roll 16 TD result, but nU blitzed | 45 | PEN YDS | 45 | ||||||||
| and rolled 1, QT and sacked the QB instead. | 0 | SACKED | 1 | ||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -6 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 95 Florida | 17 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 31 | ||||||
| 02 USC | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 14 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 95 Florida | 02 USC | ||||||||||
| The Gators were impressive, and the Trojans were | 31 | SCORE | 14 | ||||||||
| not. The stats were skewed by Fla sitting on the ball | 21 | 1ST DOWNS | 20 | ||||||||
| in the 4th qtr, and USC hitting a few big plays. But | 402 | TOTAL YDS | 436 | ||||||||
| really, Florida dominated. Florida passed with much | 37 | RUSH ATT | 38 | ||||||||
| more efficiency and USC just did not look good at | 166 | RUSH YDS | 174 | ||||||||
| all offensively. All 4 ints were off their off chart, and | 4.5 | RUSH AVG | 4.6 | ||||||||
| they just were not consistent. Good ball game for | 40 | PASS ATT | 44 | ||||||||
| Florida and one of those where the stats don't really | 25 | PASS COMP | 25 | ||||||||
| tell it. | 253 | PASS YDS | 262 | ||||||||
| Flor did get a kor for 86 yds. | 0 | INT THROWN | 4 | ||||||||
| 2 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 1 | PENALTIES | 4 | |||||||||
| 5 | PEN YDS | 20 | |||||||||
| 3 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -17 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | reg | ||||||
| 02 Iowa | 10 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 28 | ||||||
| 95 Ohio State | 7 | 7 | 14 | 0 | 28 | ||||||
| Mega 2 | ot 1 | ot 2 | final | ||||||||
| 02 Iowa | 3 | 7 | 38 | ||||||||
| 95 Ohio State | 3 | 0 | 31 | ||||||||
| 1st qtr iowa int, ret 43 yds, osu lost fum on ret though and iowa ret | |||||||||||
| that fum 68 yds for TD!!! | |||||||||||
| iowa ties it with 3 min left and we go to ot | |||||||||||
| OT 1 | |||||||||||
| Iowa | |||||||||||
| good d for osu forces short fg, 20 yds, iowa 31-28 | |||||||||||
| Ohio State | |||||||||||
| After 19 yd SOP, Iowa D stiffens, force OSU short FG 21 yd FG, tied at 31. | |||||||||||
| OT 2 | |||||||||||
| Ohio State | |||||||||||
| OSU misses 35 yd FGA, OFF 5 to start, then good D | |||||||||||
| Iowa | |||||||||||
| 14 yd TD pass after 10 yd pass, 38-31 Iowa | Visitor | Home | |||||||||
| 02 Iowa | 95 Ohio State | ||||||||||
| 28 | SCORE | 28 | |||||||||
| Only main points that came out were that Iowa | 23 | 1ST DOWNS | 21 | ||||||||
| did not even play run defense, and they have a great | 417 | TOTAL YDS | 415 | ||||||||
| run D, until maybe the 4th. Also, that Iowa does | 55 | RUSH ATT | 43 | ||||||||
| not have a running game to go to when they | 179 | RUSH YDS | 197 | ||||||||
| need it. They won this one with that freak play, | 3.3 | RUSH AVG | 4.6 | ||||||||
| decent D down the stretch, and a few good | 36 | PASS ATT | 41 | ||||||||
| punt returns. | 22 | PASS COMP | 21 | ||||||||
| 238 | PASS YDS | 233 | |||||||||
| 2 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 2 | |||||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 5 | PENALTIES | 7 | |||||||||
| 46 | PEN YDS | 52 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 2 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -15 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 02 Ohio State | 10 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 26 | ||||||
| 97 UNC | 0 | 7 | 0 | 13 | 20 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Excellent game. Fun to watch. UNC scored on | 02 Ohio State | 97 UNC | |||||||||
| the next to last play, so it wasn't this close. Steadily, | 26 | SCORE | 20 | ||||||||
| OSU took over the game. It was a very Buckeye | 24 | 1ST DOWNS | 18 | ||||||||
| game in so many ways. OSU missed no FGs. Good | 417 | TOTAL YDS | 309 | ||||||||
| clean ball game in all areas. UNC has little running | 63 | RUSH ATT | 33 | ||||||||
| game. Heels D did play well and make some plays, | 322 | RUSH YDS | 80 | ||||||||
| but they are far from impressive stopping the run. | 5.1 | RUSH AVG | 2.4 | ||||||||
| OSU is pretty tough in that they are consistent when | 14 | PASS ATT | 31 | ||||||||
| they run, efficient when they pass, and that QR is | 8 | PASS COMP | 20 | ||||||||
| a wildcard for them. Nice job by OSU. | 95 | PASS YDS | 237 | ||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 1 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 1 | |||||||||
| 5 | PENALTIES | 10 | |||||||||
| 36 | PEN YDS | 61 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -8 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 02 Kansas St | 0 | 7 | 24 | 0 | 31 | ||||||
| 04 U Conn | 0 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 28 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 02 Kansas St | 04 U Conn | ||||||||||
| I am surprised KS could not blow out UC. UC had | 31 | SCORE | 28 | ||||||||
| some problems getting their passing in sync at times, | 22 | 1ST DOWNS | 15 | ||||||||
| but their comeback was ligit. KS had a lot of neg | 361 | TOTAL YDS | 311 | ||||||||
| rushes. | 64 | RUSH ATT | 26 | ||||||||
| 256 | RUSH YDS | 72 | |||||||||
| 4.0 | RUSH AVG | 2.8 | |||||||||
| 14 | PASS ATT | 53 | |||||||||
| 6 | PASS COMP | 24 | |||||||||
| 105 | PASS YDS | 249 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 3 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 2 | |||||||||
| 8 | PENALTIES | 13 | |||||||||
| 45 | PEN YDS | 106 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -10 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 24 Notre Dame | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | ||||||
| 00 Va Tech | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 24 Notre Dame | 00 Va Tech | ||||||||||
| Great game. Miserable comeback execution in the | 7 | SCORE | 6 | ||||||||
| 4th from VT. Fums a huge problem for VT, of course. | 15 | 1ST DOWNS | 14 | ||||||||
| ND missed a FGA, then later went for it on 4th down | 299 | TOTAL YDS | 264 | ||||||||
| and converted to then get the TD, so the poor FG | 55 | RUSH ATT | 47 | ||||||||
| kicker somewhat a blessing. VT has a good FG kicker | 157 | RUSH YDS | 173 | ||||||||
| so they let him kick earlier in the 4th thinking they | 2.9 | RUSH AVG | 3.7 | ||||||||
| would get an opp later, but did not. Great fun to | 17 | PASS ATT | 24 | ||||||||
| watch these two different styles and eras come | 12 | PASS COMP | 9 | ||||||||
| together to play. | 149 | PASS YDS | 91 | ||||||||
| 2 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 3 | FUM LOST | 5 | |||||||||
| 5 | TURNOVERS | 7 | |||||||||
| 4 | PENALTIES | 4 | |||||||||
| 30 | PEN YDS | 25 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -7 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 03 Purdue | 7 | 14 | 7 | 14 | 42 | ||||||
| 01 Nebraska | 7 | 7 | 14 | 9 | 37 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Hard to beat this one. Both defenses controlled | 03 Purdue | 01 Nebraska | |||||||||
| early, and still played well all game, but these two | 42 | SCORE | 37 | ||||||||
| offenses took the stage for most of the way. | 26 | 1ST DOWNS | 20 | ||||||||
| Exceptional play and chart interaction. NU played | 437 | TOTAL YDS | 385 | ||||||||
| catchup from the late 2nd qtr on. Purdue was hot | 39 | RUSH ATT | 57 | ||||||||
| passing, and even hotter with QRs. Very consistent | 185 | RUSH YDS | 246 | ||||||||
| job on both sides of the ball for them. NU did very | 4.7 | RUSH AVG | 4.3 | ||||||||
| well offensively as well, but could not stop Purdue | 37 | PASS ATT | 20 | ||||||||
| in the late goings. NU did miss some 4th qtr opps | 24 | PASS COMP | 11 | ||||||||
| when they had the ball. They scored very late, missed | 252 | PASS YDS | 139 | ||||||||
| the 2pt try, but did recover the onside, only to throw | 0 | INT THROWN | 1 | ||||||||
| an int on the next to last play. A dbp int'ed on the | 1 | FUM LOST | 1 | ||||||||
| Pur 9. | 1 | TURNOVERS | 2 | ||||||||
| 6 | PENALTIES | 3 | |||||||||
| 58 | PEN YDS | 45 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 05 West Virginia | 0 | 7 | 0 | 17 | 24 | ||||||
| 96 Washington | 14 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 35 | ||||||
| Check out the 1st half stats. Very steady game | Visitor | Home | Visitor | 1st half | Home | ||||||
| for Wash. This is a "smart" chart. WV was | 05 West Virginia | 96 Washington | 05 West Virginia | 96 Washington | |||||||
| very explosive at times, but did nothing with | 24 | SCORE | 35 | 7 | SCORE | 28 | |||||
| their passing game. Wash capped on WVs rather | 17 | 1ST DOWNS | 21 | 4 | 1ST DOWNS | 11 | |||||
| weak long pass D and called dbps on early | 443 | TOTAL YDS | 524 | 154 | TOTAL YDS | 385 | |||||
| downs, unable to do so via the PPL of WV on | 51 | RUSH ATT | 45 | 21 | RUSH ATT | 22 | |||||
| 3rd and longs. It worked. Wash got a 96 yd TD | 351 | RUSH YDS | 172 | 150 | RUSH YDS | 87 | |||||
| dbp via the WV def. WV got a 67 yd TD run to their | 6.9 | RUSH AVG | 3.8 | 7.1 | RUSH AVG | 3.954545455 | |||||
| credit. The 96 yd pass for Wash was on a sol def | 24 | PASS ATT | 32 | 13 | PASS ATT | 21 | |||||
| d20 roll of 19, the one I added for this game. | 6 | PASS COMP | 18 | 1 | PASS COMP | 12 | |||||
| 92 | PASS YDS | 361 | 4 | PASS YDS | 307 | ||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 1 | 1 | INT THROWN | 1 | ||||||
| 2 | FUM LOST | 1 | 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | ||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 2 | 2 | TURNOVERS | 1 | ||||||
| 7 | PENALTIES | 5 | 2 | PENALTIES | 3 | ||||||
| 50 | PEN YDS | 45 | 11 | PEN YDS | 35 | ||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | 0 | SACKED | 1 | ||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -9 | 0 | YDS LOST | -9 | ||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 04 Va Tech | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 12 | ||||||
| 02 Oregon St | 0 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 13 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 04 Va Tech | 02 Oregon St | ||||||||||
| Terrific game. Had it all. Momentum swings were | 12 | SCORE | 13 | ||||||||
| big and often. Both defenses played well. VT looked | 12 | 1ST DOWNS | 22 | ||||||||
| more steady most of the game, but took a fatal risk | 282 | TOTAL YDS | 467 | ||||||||
| that backfired in the 3rd going for 2 and failing. OSU | 43 | RUSH ATT | 49 | ||||||||
| kicked a winning FG and their D brought home a huge | 202 | RUSH YDS | 220 | ||||||||
| win. This Beaver team doesn't play like a 230 chart. | 4.7 | RUSH AVG | 4.5 | ||||||||
| The OSU big play passing once again was the thing | 22 | PASS ATT | 36 | ||||||||
| that put them over. Strong defense and long passing. | 9 | PASS COMP | 14 | ||||||||
| 80 | PASS YDS | 258 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 3 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 1 | TURNOVERS | 3 | |||||||||
| 7 | PENALTIES | 6 | |||||||||
| 61 | PEN YDS | 40 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -11 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 94 Penn State | 14 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 35 | ||||||
| 05 Texas | 10 | 7 | 14 | 10 | 41 | ||||||
| ps 1st qtr 11.20 72 yd draw for td 3rd and 9 | |||||||||||
| tex 14 yd opt for td to take lead .40 left 41-35 horns | |||||||||||
| tex fum, but then ps fum running out clock to set this up | |||||||||||
| vince made a couple huge 3rd downs, one with feet other with arm | |||||||||||
| ps completes all 3 dbps but tex takes yds off and ps only gets to the tex 43 | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Very good game as expected and down to the | 94 Penn State | 05 Texas | |||||||||
| wire as expected. Vince made key plays down the | 35 | SCORE | 41 | ||||||||
| stretch to lead the Horns from behind, as expected. | 29 | 1ST DOWNS | 22 | ||||||||
| The PS offense was really unstoppable. Both teams | 591 | TOTAL YDS | 505 | ||||||||
| missed one FGA. Texas seemed to sqaunder a couple | 42 | RUSH ATT | 56 | ||||||||
| of opps early in the game. Other than that, both offenses | 316 | RUSH YDS | 378 | ||||||||
| had control. The Texas defense played well, but really | 7.5 | RUSH AVG | 6.8 | ||||||||
| just could not do much to stop PS. PS also did very | 35 | PASS ATT | 17 | ||||||||
| well converting 3rd and long, as expected again. | 23 | PASS COMP | 9 | ||||||||
| Texas actually used a variance of the balanced | 281 | PASS YDS | 127 | ||||||||
| gameplan, yet they ran so much. Their counter and | 1 | INT THROWN | 0 | ||||||||
| running game really came through for them, and they | 1 | FUM LOST | 1 | ||||||||
| just kept things tight with their ground game. Good | 2 | TURNOVERS | 1 | ||||||||
| timing for things in the Horns coming out with this | 5 | PENALTIES | 8 | ||||||||
| one. I got the impression that PS won the first half | 27 | PEN YDS | 60 | ||||||||
| cause they started with the ball and Texas the 2nd | 1 | SACKED | 0 | ||||||||
| because of the same. These two could exchange | -6 | YDS LOST | 0 | ||||||||
| scores forever. | |||||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 94 Colorado | 3 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 27 | ||||||
| 94 Michigan | 0 | 6 | 17 | 6 | 29 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Pretty amazing game. Tight first half, with Mich | 94 Colorado | 94 Michigan | |||||||||
| missing out on some opps. Col went up 17 to 6 | 27 | SCORE | 29 | ||||||||
| early in the 3rd and they were pumped, had all the | 28 | 1ST DOWNS | 22 | ||||||||
| momentum and ready to put it away. But, Mich came | 500 | TOTAL YDS | 469 | ||||||||
| storming back, playing unbelievable ball on both | 50 | RUSH ATT | 34 | ||||||||
| sides, and made so many stops in the 2nd half. | 287 | RUSH YDS | 151 | ||||||||
| Mich stormed ahead 23-17, then things tightened up | 5.7 | RUSH AVG | 4.4 | ||||||||
| again. Mich thought they had iced it with a 4th qtr | 33 | PASS ATT | 34 | ||||||||
| TD, but they misses the pat, 29-20 Mich. Col came | 17 | PASS COMP | 21 | ||||||||
| back quickly but failed to recover the onside. Still | 213 | PASS YDS | 334 | ||||||||
| over 2 min left. Mich went 3 and out. Col had no to's | 1 | INT THROWN | 3 | ||||||||
| left though. Col got to the Mich 34, but DEF 5 extended | 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | ||||||||
| the game. Col threw inc on last play, and would have | 2 | TURNOVERS | 3 | ||||||||
| missed the FGA. Good game! | 5 | PENALTIES | 8 | ||||||||
| 34 | PEN YDS | 49 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 2 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -16 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 94 Texas A&M | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 20 | ||||||
| 05 USC | 3 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 24 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Decent game. | 94 Texas A&M | 05 USC | |||||||||
| Aggies start out the game with some bad throws and | 20 | SCORE | 24 | ||||||||
| INTs, but regain themselves, and then USC starts | 20 | 1ST DOWNS | 26 | ||||||||
| to hit stride in the 2nd qtr. USCs running game was | 375 | TOTAL YDS | 493 | ||||||||
| impressive all game, in spite of very good run defense | 34 | RUSH ATT | 55 | ||||||||
| by A&M. The Aggies overall just did what they do, | 172 | RUSH YDS | 335 | ||||||||
| playing well round ball in every phase. They setup | 5.1 | RUSH AVG | 6.1 | ||||||||
| two scores via their strong kor. USC is just too strong | 35 | PASS ATT | 28 | ||||||||
| for A&M offensively. USC sputter's some thru the | 17 | PASS COMP | 16 | ||||||||
| 2nd half. A&M ends up throwing a 4th down pass in a | 203 | PASS YDS | 162 | ||||||||
| late comeback attempt, and USC makes a great play | 4 | INT THROWN | 1 | ||||||||
| with a neg # on the play to make it come up one | 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | ||||||||
| yard short. | 5 | TURNOVERS | 1 | ||||||||
| This was in the middle of the field, so A&M would have | 7 | PENALTIES | 10 | ||||||||
| had more work to do. | 49 | PEN YDS | 66 | ||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -4 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 95 Nebraska | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 28 | ||||||
| 95 Florida | 10 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 30 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| NU won so many of the battles, but Fla wins the | 95 Nebraska | 95 Florida | |||||||||
| war. Fla got a 71 yd TD SOP in the first and | 28 | SCORE | 30 | ||||||||
| opened the 3rd with a 102 yd kor for TD. Also, | 27 | 1ST DOWNS | 21 | ||||||||
| the Gators had an unreal day running the ball, with | 454 | TOTAL YDS | 488 | ||||||||
| tons of B runs, and NU rolled a bunch of TD rolls, that | 70 | RUSH ATT | 28 | ||||||||
| "did not count", having to record another play, etc. | 376 | RUSH YDS | 196 | ||||||||
| Big plays wins it for Fla, who tacked on a FG to | 5.4 | RUSH AVG | 7.0 | ||||||||
| put them ahead by 2 scores. Fla recovers the onside | 19 | PASS ATT | 36 | ||||||||
| and runs out the clock, with yet another B run on 3rd | 7 | PASS COMP | 19 | ||||||||
| down. | 78 | PASS YDS | 300 | ||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 2 | |||||||||
| 7 | PENALTIES | 9 | |||||||||
| 45 | PEN YDS | 51 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -8 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 02 Iowa | 6 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 20 | ||||||
| 02 Ohio State | 3 | 3 | 14 | 3 | 23 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 02 Iowa | 02 Ohio State | ||||||||||
| Well, obviously a very even game, and a good one. | 20 | SCORE | 23 | ||||||||
| I really don’t know how OSU does it. They don't look | 17 | 1ST DOWNS | 18 | ||||||||
| like some great chart, but they seem to play so steady | 369 | TOTAL YDS | 368 | ||||||||
| and within themselves, and always seem to have | 34 | RUSH ATT | 69 | ||||||||
| enough. Iowa is very powerful, especially with D and | 125 | RUSH YDS | 254 | ||||||||
| STs and they made a ton of plays on both. But, they | 3.7 | RUSH AVG | 3.7 | ||||||||
| go for it at the GL near the end of the game and | 31 | PASS ATT | 10 | ||||||||
| fail, as I wished to avoid OT. Very steady job running | 20 | PASS COMP | 5 | ||||||||
| the ball and just chopping off 3 to 5 yds consistently | 244 | PASS YDS | 114 | ||||||||
| for OSU. | 1 | INT THROWN | 1 | ||||||||
| 3 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 4 | TURNOVERS | 1 | |||||||||
| 9 | PENALTIES | 5 | |||||||||
| 61 | PEN YDS | 32 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 02 Kansas St | 0 | 21 | 14 | 7 | 42 | ||||||
| 24 Notre Dame | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 02 Kansas St | 24 Notre Dame | ||||||||||
| Whoa! Suddenly KS gets thrust into the limelight | 42 | SCORE | 0 | ||||||||
| as being a team that could take this tourney, or | 19 | 1ST DOWNS | 17 | ||||||||
| at least go to the semis. Impressive does not | 390 | TOTAL YDS | 321 | ||||||||
| describe their complete annialation in every | 49 | RUSH ATT | 58 | ||||||||
| phase of the game, of the Horsemen. ND had big | 255 | RUSH YDS | 271 | ||||||||
| fum problems, and recovered 4 of their own. ND | 5.2 | RUSH AVG | 4.7 | ||||||||
| converted multiple 4th downs in the 4th and got | 11 | PASS ATT | 20 | ||||||||
| several B runs to make the stats look good. But, this | 7 | PASS COMP | 9 | ||||||||
| was no match. | 135 | PASS YDS | 50 | ||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 0 | |||||||||
| 2 | FUM LOST | 4 | |||||||||
| 2 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 3 | PENALTIES | 6 | |||||||||
| 25 | PEN YDS | 56 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 03 Purdue | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 17 | ||||||
| 96 Washington | 3 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 24 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Fairly even and very dull, uninteresting game ends | 03 Purdue | 96 Washington | |||||||||
| when Pur drives to the Wash 7 with :30 left, but | 17 | SCORE | 24 | ||||||||
| gets OFF 10, then throws two dbp's inc to end the game. | 15 | 1ST DOWNS | 20 | ||||||||
| Both defenses played well and got the INTs. | 296 | TOTAL YDS | 348 | ||||||||
| Good special teams exhibited by both, but Wash | 34 | RUSH ATT | 50 | ||||||||
| tilted the game their way with good running and | 112 | RUSH YDS | 191 | ||||||||
| better ST play. Wash missed two FGAs that were | 3.3 | RUSH AVG | 3.8 | ||||||||
| very makable in the 2nd half that would have | 36 | PASS ATT | 29 | ||||||||
| essentially iced the game. | 20 | PASS COMP | 15 | ||||||||
| 199 | PASS YDS | 157 | |||||||||
| 3 | INT THROWN | 4 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 7 | PENALTIES | 8 | |||||||||
| 62 | PEN YDS | 50 | |||||||||
| 3 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -15 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 02 Oregon St | 3 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 13 | ||||||
| 05 Texas | 6 | 10 | 17 | 0 | 33 | ||||||
| Tex 72 yd pr for td 3rd qtr | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Easiest game in many ways for Texas so far. | 02 Oregon St | 05 Texas | |||||||||
| OSU loses too many fumbles and doesn't have | 13 | SCORE | 33 | ||||||||
| enough magic in their passing game today. Texas | 15 | 1ST DOWNS | 25 | ||||||||
| could have made it much worse, but had to kick | 339 | TOTAL YDS | 422 | ||||||||
| FGs instead of getting TDs too often. Texas destroyed | 38 | RUSH ATT | 56 | ||||||||
| OSU all game long with prs. | 163 | RUSH YDS | 249 | ||||||||
| 4.3 | RUSH AVG | 4.4 | |||||||||
| 26 | PASS ATT | 26 | |||||||||
| 12 | PASS COMP | 15 | |||||||||
| 176 | PASS YDS | 180 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 4 | FUM LOST | 1 | |||||||||
| 4 | TURNOVERS | 3 | |||||||||
| 8 | PENALTIES | 10 | |||||||||
| 50 | PEN YDS | 62 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -7 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 94 Michigan | 14 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 38 | ||||||
| 05 USC | 7 | 10 | 3 | 14 | 34 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| A dead even, back and forth game. Mich wins | 94 Michigan | 05 USC | |||||||||
| it on the next to last play with a TD pass. | 38 | SCORE | 34 | ||||||||
| Really it was just that Mich had the ball last, but | 19 | 1ST DOWNS | 24 | ||||||||
| I will give some credit. USC punted their last | 398 | TOTAL YDS | 512 | ||||||||
| 2 possessions, so they really should have pulled | 34 | RUSH ATT | 37 | ||||||||
| it out. Good game. | 155 | RUSH YDS | 202 | ||||||||
| Mich last drive passing was 7-9 for 85 yds. | 4.6 | RUSH AVG | 5.5 | ||||||||
| 36 | PASS ATT | 46 | |||||||||
| 22 | PASS COMP | 26 | |||||||||
| 243 | PASS YDS | 310 | |||||||||
| 0 | INT THROWN | 3 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 0 | TURNOVERS | 3 | |||||||||
| 6 | PENALTIES | 12 | |||||||||
| 45 | PEN YDS | 92 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 95 Florida | 10 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 32 | ||||||
| 02 Ohio State | 3 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 31 | ||||||
| OSU ends the first half with a 19 play 98 yd grueling drive, capping with 3rd and goal | |||||||||||
| TD pass of 14 yds, took most of the qtr, incredible | |||||||||||
| Flor scores on a 1 yd td pass, last play of the game, comp SOP for 2 pt conv for the win. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| It'd be darn tough to beat this one. Although Fla looked | 95 Florida | 02 Ohio State | |||||||||
| like the better team, OSU played better today, and I | 32 | SCORE | 31 | ||||||||
| thought OSU deserved it. Fla pounced on OSU early | 24 | 1ST DOWNS | 31 | ||||||||
| and it looked to be a blowout. I don't know how OS | 422 | TOTAL YDS | 466 | ||||||||
| always does it, but they always seem to absorb things | 24 | RUSH ATT | 68 | ||||||||
| like this, and then get the game settled into their | 66 | RUSH YDS | 310 | ||||||||
| game. They did it again today. Fla played some | 2.8 | RUSH AVG | 4.6 | ||||||||
| terrific defense in the first half. That disappated in | 41 | PASS ATT | 20 | ||||||||
| the 2nd half. The very long drive for OS to end | 25 | PASS COMP | 11 | ||||||||
| the first half looked to be a back breaker for the Fl | 356 | PASS YDS | 156 | ||||||||
| spirit. OS lost all 3 fums in the 3rd qtr, each time | 2 | INT THROWN | 0 | ||||||||
| with FP and driving. That was huge. Fla had to turn | 0 | FUM LOST | 3 | ||||||||
| to all out passing in the 4th, and OS just doesn't | 2 | TURNOVERS | 3 | ||||||||
| make enough plays, even with the 14 pt lead, to | 10 | PENALTIES | 14 | ||||||||
| hold onto the game. Great finish in the last seconds. | 68 | PEN YDS | 104 | ||||||||
| Both Fla ints off the OS chart. Really both teams brought | 0 | SACKED | 0 | ||||||||
| it today. This was great. | 0 | YDS LOST | 0 | ||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 02 Kansas St | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 42 | ||||||
| 96 Washington | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| Another dominating performance for KS. Wash not | 02 Kansas St | 96 Washington | |||||||||
| worthy to hold their jock strap. This a complete | 42 | SCORE | 7 | ||||||||
| humiliation. KS is very good, but now will face a | 27 | 1ST DOWNS | 10 | ||||||||
| test. | 577 | TOTAL YDS | 170 | ||||||||
| 78 | RUSH ATT | 26 | |||||||||
| 488 | RUSH YDS | 70 | |||||||||
| 6.3 | RUSH AVG | 2.7 | |||||||||
| 14 | PASS ATT | 37 | |||||||||
| 7 | PASS COMP | 9 | |||||||||
| 89 | PASS YDS | 109 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 1 | |||||||||
| 2 | FUM LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| 3 | TURNOVERS | 1 | |||||||||
| 9 | PENALTIES | 4 | |||||||||
| 79 | PEN YDS | 32 | |||||||||
| 0 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | YDS LOST | -9 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 05 Texas | 3 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 27 | ||||||
| 94 Michigan | 7 | 13 | 0 | 14 | 34 | ||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 05 Texas | 94 Michigan | ||||||||||
| The magic continues for Mich. They save their best game | 27 | SCORE | 34 | ||||||||
| of the tourney for the Horns. Texas stayed in their | 20 | 1ST DOWNS | 24 | ||||||||
| running gameplan, and probably wishes they had | 501 | TOTAL YDS | 551 | ||||||||
| gone to the passing game sooner, as they made | 44 | RUSH ATT | 53 | ||||||||
| a huge comeback effort. Texas did play fairly well | 230 | RUSH YDS | 274 | ||||||||
| overall, but they had no answer defensively for Mich, | 5.2 | RUSH AVG | 5.2 | ||||||||
| especially in the 1st half. Texas played pretty impressive | 22 | PASS ATT | 28 | ||||||||
| defense at times in the 2nd half. For Mich, they played | 15 | PASS COMP | 17 | ||||||||
| maybe the best half of football I have seen, in the 1st. | 278 | PASS YDS | 277 | ||||||||
| They cannot play better. Their running was unstoppable, | 1 | INT THROWN | 0 | ||||||||
| but their passing was unbelievable. They had like 341 | 1 | FUM LOST | 0 | ||||||||
| yds in the first half, with maybe 3 inc's. They cooled | 2 | TURNOVERS | 0 | ||||||||
| in the 2nd half, but scored their first TD in the 4th | 9 | PENALTIES | 5 | ||||||||
| all with downfield passes, getting hot again briefly. | 85 | PEN YDS | 30 | ||||||||
| Incredibly well played game for Michigan. | 1 | SACKED | 0 | ||||||||
| -7 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 95 Florida | 7 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 23 | ||||||
| 02 Kansas St | 7 | 6 | 0 | 14 | 27 | ||||||
| On 3rd and 12, with 1:00 to go, KS gets a 21 yd QR for a TD, huge, puts em ahead by 4. | |||||||||||
| Holy cow, unbelievable fitting end to the game. Fla is at midfield, but last play of the game. | |||||||||||
| They go dbp, and get a TD (20 roll), but KS black boxed it PPL (1 roll) for the victory. | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 95 Florida | 02 Kansas St | ||||||||||
| Well, this was a classic matchup between the run | 23 | SCORE | 27 | ||||||||
| vs. pass. KS made a couple of humongous plays | 21 | 1ST DOWNS | 24 | ||||||||
| in the end to pull it out. The fumble bug finally | 396 | TOTAL YDS | 396 | ||||||||
| bit KS. It felt like Florida's game most of the day. | 34 | RUSH ATT | 62 | ||||||||
| Look at those yds. Very well played game, good | 113 | RUSH YDS | 307 | ||||||||
| on both sides of the ball. Great finish. KS did | 3.3 | RUSH AVG | 5.0 | ||||||||
| miss an extra point. | 34 | PASS ATT | 15 | ||||||||
| 20 | PASS COMP | 7 | |||||||||
| 292 | PASS YDS | 99 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 1 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 3 | |||||||||
| 1 | TURNOVERS | 4 | |||||||||
| 4 | PENALTIES | 5 | |||||||||
| 48 | PEN YDS | 41 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 1 | |||||||||
| -9 | YDS LOST | -10 | |||||||||
| Mega 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | FINAL | ||||||
| 94 Michigan | 7 | 9 | 10 | 14 | 40 | ||||||
| 02 Kansas St | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 10 | ||||||
| Mich 32 yd int ret for td int on def chart, 7-0 11.0 1st | |||||||||||
| Visitor | Home | ||||||||||
| 94 Michigan | 02 Kansas St | ||||||||||
| Another great job by Mich. KS did make a ton of | 40 | SCORE | 10 | ||||||||
| defensive plays, but KS had a poor day offensively | 22 | 1ST DOWNS | 14 | ||||||||
| and things got way out of hand. Very strong showing | 407 | TOTAL YDS | 252 | ||||||||
| for Mich again, both sides of the ball. | 53 | RUSH ATT | 51 | ||||||||
| 213 | RUSH YDS | 204 | |||||||||
| 4.0 | RUSH AVG | 4.0 | |||||||||
| 23 | PASS ATT | 11 | |||||||||
| 17 | PASS COMP | 3 | |||||||||
| 200 | PASS YDS | 48 | |||||||||
| 1 | INT THROWN | 2 | |||||||||
| 0 | FUM LOST | 3 | |||||||||
| 1 | TURNOVERS | 5 | |||||||||
| 6 | PENALTIES | 8 | |||||||||
| 45 | PEN YDS | 50 | |||||||||
| 1 | SACKED | 0 | |||||||||
| -6 | YDS LOST | 0 | |||||||||