Mega
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
01 Oklahoma |
0 |
9 |
3 |
7 |
19 |
|
|
93 Notre Dame |
14 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
OU scores but
fails to get the onside kick with |
|
01 Oklahoma |
|
93 Notre Dame |
about a minute
left and that's it. Both teams played |
19 |
SCORE |
21 |
very good
defense. OU was extremely impressive |
|
17 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
defensively
after the first qtr. Pretty good, even |
|
332 |
TOTAL YDS |
302 |
game. ND scored TDs, OU just could not finish |
|
30 |
RUSH ATT |
40 |
drives. This is really no accident. ND finished because |
130 |
RUSH YDS |
106 |
and with
big plays. OU plays much more
"shorter" |
|
4.3 |
RUSH AVG |
2.7 |
football, and
that kept them from getting TDs. |
|
51 |
PASS ATT |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
PASS COMP |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
PASS YDS |
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-16 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
83 Miami |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
|
|
96 Nebraska |
7 |
10 |
7 |
13 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami gets a
51 yd draw play to setup their first score. |
|
|
|
Neb recovers a
Miami QR -5 yd fumble in the end zone for their first score. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These two
looked even in many ways. Both have |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
great defenses
and both played well defensively. |
|
83 Miami |
|
96 Nebraska |
Turnovers
killed the Canes. Amazing to see a
game |
7 |
SCORE |
37 |
with only 3
flags. NU had major problems with the |
|
24 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
fantastic
option defense of Miami, but ruled in a big |
476 |
TOTAL YDS |
376 |
way the field
position battle. Also, trademark of
the |
38 |
RUSH ATT |
55 |
Mays '90s NU
charts, the Huskers made several big |
|
149 |
RUSH YDS |
201 |
gainers
seemingly out of nowhere. |
|
|
3.9 |
RUSH AVG |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PASS ATT |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
PASS YDS |
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
PENALTIES |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
PEN YDS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
93 UNC |
7 |
7 |
0 |
21 |
35 |
|
|
83 Nebraska |
7 |
10 |
3 |
16 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNC returns
opening KO 105 yds for a TD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neb scores a
TD and 2 pt QR for a 36-35 lead with :30 left in the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
93 UNC |
|
83 Nebraska |
Both teams
looked very, very even. Neb hands over |
35 |
SCORE |
36 |
great field
position to UNC late in the game, helping |
19 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
the Heels
regain the lead. But, with time
running out |
367 |
TOTAL YDS |
402 |
UNC gives Neb
a fumble and the Huskers only have to |
39 |
RUSH ATT |
60 |
go 24 yds for
the game winner. |
|
|
|
163 |
RUSH YDS |
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
RUSH AVG |
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
PASS ATT |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
PASS COMP |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
208 |
PASS YDS |
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
PEN YDS |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
-4 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
73 LSU |
7 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
22 |
|
|
93 FSU |
7 |
13 |
0 |
7 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
LSU scores on
the last play of the game, so it wasn't |
73 LSU |
|
93 FSU |
quite this
close. LSU does as they always do,
hanging |
22 |
SCORE |
27 |
in there against
a great team. FSU really defended |
25 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
well against
LSU. It was a very enjoyable game. |
|
410 |
TOTAL YDS |
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
RUSH ATT |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
RUSH YDS |
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
RUSH AVG |
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
PASS ATT |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
PASS COMP |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
194 |
PASS YDS |
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
PEN YDS |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
-5 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
93 Tennessee |
3 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
03 Minnesota |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minn scores
with 1:20 left in the game to take a 28-24 lead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
These two have
some similarities. Minn runs much |
|
93 Tennessee |
|
03 Minnesota |
more. The Vols FG was a chip shot, and I thought |
|
24 |
SCORE |
28 |
about going
for it. Minn often moved the ball into |
|
18 |
1ST DOWNS |
28 |
long range FG
area, and did play better. The Gophs |
397 |
TOTAL YDS |
479 |
have a
"call it and stop it" defense, but they are not |
25 |
RUSH ATT |
67 |
as well
rounded as the Vols. Tenn has a bend
but |
|
148 |
RUSH YDS |
319 |
don't break type
defense, which had a hard time |
|
5.9 |
RUSH AVG |
4.8 |
getting the
ball away from Minn. Good game
overall. |
33 |
PASS ATT |
27 |
I really enjoy
this Tenn chart. It plays so
accurately. |
23 |
PASS COMP |
17 |
The Minn
running game is withering. |
|
|
249 |
PASS YDS |
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-9 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
93 Arizona |
6 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
20 |
|
|
83 Auburn |
0 |
17 |
13 |
0 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
3 TDs for
Auburn, 21 points, were directly setup by |
|
93 Arizona |
|
83 Auburn |
Arizona
turnovers. They were all easy
conversions, |
20 |
SCORE |
30 |
and all
miscues off the Arizona offensive chart.
Another |
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
6 points for
Auburn came with the assistance of very |
268 |
TOTAL YDS |
248 |
poor Arizona
punts. If the Cats had an offense or a |
|
28 |
RUSH ATT |
56 |
better special
teams, they would likely blow out this |
79 |
RUSH YDS |
188 |
awesome Auburn
team. But, Auburn is well rounded |
2.8 |
RUSH AVG |
3.4 |
enough to take
advantage and win. This Arizona |
|
39 |
PASS ATT |
17 |
defense is
really amazing. The only reason the
Tigers |
15 |
PASS COMP |
8 |
got the
rushing yds they did was because of several |
207 |
PASS YDS |
72 |
long
Bs. |
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
PEN YDS |
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
-18 |
YDS LOST |
-12 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
01 Miami FL |
10 |
3 |
0 |
13 |
26 |
|
|
73 Oklahoma |
7 |
3 |
0 |
14 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Early on Miami
rolled a ton of DEF pen against OU.
Also, Miami got many |
|
|
3rd and long
conversions. The Canes seemed to have
all the luck in the |
|
|
first half,
getting exactly 3 on 3rd and 3, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OU
missed a first half FGA, and early in the 3rd got a NG on a 19 |
|
|
|
yd FGA!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OU takes a
17-13 lead on the first play of the 4th, a TD roll on an |
|
|
|
option that
went 37 yds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami INTs a
pass (their def chart) and returns it 42 yds |
|
|
|
to set them up
at the Sooner 9. On 3rd and goal from
the 5, |
|
|
|
Miami throws
inc, but OU has QR, and the Canes QB gets |
|
|
|
enough for the TD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Miami had the
fortune in the first half, when it comes |
01 Miami FL |
|
73 Oklahoma |
to the rolls,
not just how they fell, but when it would |
26 |
SCORE |
24 |
happen. That area was pretty even throughout the |
|
22 |
1ST DOWNS |
17 |
2nd half. There were two main things that the game |
348 |
TOTAL YDS |
385 |
would depend
on, looking at the charts pre-game. |
|
45 |
RUSH ATT |
59 |
One was the
clear advantage that Miami holds in the |
177 |
RUSH YDS |
312 |
special
teams. This did matter, and matter a
lot. Miami |
3.9 |
RUSH AVG |
5.3 |
made all their
FGs, and two of them were long. OU |
35 |
PASS ATT |
8 |
missed two
FGAs, and one of them a gimmie. OU had |
14 |
PASS COMP |
4 |
one punt that
went 56 yds, WITH the *, which was huge |
173 |
PASS YDS |
78 |
because Miami
had a TD result. The other area was |
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
the fact that
Miami passes better than they run, and |
2 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
OU stops the
run better, so there was some room for the |
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
Cane passing
game to work. How good Miami would |
7 |
PENALTIES |
12 |
do there was
the question. Although Miami got to OU |
45 |
PEN YDS |
91 |
some in the
passing game, the stats clearly show that |
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
Miami did not
have great success there, and could |
|
-2 |
YDS LOST |
-5 |
not take over
the game with their passing.
Another |
|
|
|
note on the
charts is that Miami (of course), being a |
|
|
|
|
great defense,
does not have any ( ) results to stop |
|
|
|
|
the
option. Although they have tons of red
#s, they |
|
|
|
won't stop the
OU option long runs without those ( ). |
|
|
|
The notes
leave this off, so I'll note that Miami scored |
|
|
|
to ice the
game with only a minute or so left, but OU |
|
|
|
completed a
couple of long passes and added a very |
|
|
|
late TD of their own. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was a very
even game, and a good one. The
misfortune |
|
|
|
for OU with
penalties, (many DEF off the Miami chart) and |
|
|
|
with the FG
kicking (although it's not strong) were big |
|
|
|
reasons for
their loss. I think OU might be a
little better than |
|
|
|
Miami most
days. The wildcard to that is how well
Miami |
|
|
|
will
pass. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I enjoy
playing with OU, being an option team.
They almost |
|
|
|
always make
for good games. But, there is
something about |
|
|
|
many of their
games that is a little ugly, that I just can't put |
|
|
|
my finger
on. Miami can make for some real ugly
games, but |
|
|
|
this one
turned out pretty good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
73 Alabama |
5 |
14 |
0 |
21 |
40 |
|
|
94 USC |
0 |
14 |
6 |
14 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bama ties the
game at 27 with 8.5 min to |
|
|
|
|
|
go with a 104
yd KOR for a TD. 2 pt option run. |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
73 Alabama |
|
94 USC |
On USCs next
poss, they throw an INT to setup an |
|
40 |
SCORE |
34 |
easy TD
putting Bama ahead. |
|
|
|
19 |
1ST DOWNS |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
400 |
TOTAL YDS |
571 |
In the last minute of
the game, Bama ices it |
|
53 |
RUSH ATT |
40 |
with an INT
(their def chart) and 64 yd return for TD. |
356 |
RUSH YDS |
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
RUSH AVG |
5.4 |
94 USC is
probably in the top 2 or 3 % of all the Mays |
5 |
PASS ATT |
44 |
charts when it
comes to the ability to score quickly. |
|
3 |
PASS COMP |
27 |
That offense
is the reason this "mismatch" was made. |
50 |
PASS YDS |
359 |
They had great
numbers in the midst of a very fine |
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
defense. Bama needed everything they had to win |
|
5 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
this one, as
the notes imply. Bama had major
fumbling |
5 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
problems. Alabama shows why they are so good, |
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
though. They can beat you in a lot of different
ways. |
30 |
PEN YDS |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
-6 |
YDS LOST |
-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
73 Notre Dame |
3 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
|
|
99 Texas |
0 |
0 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
The ND defense
will not |
|
|
|
73 Notre Dame |
|
99 Texas |
allow Texas to
do a thing. |
|
|
|
16 |
SCORE |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
331 |
TOTAL YDS |
179 |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
RUSH ATT |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
281 |
RUSH YDS |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
RUSH AVG |
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PASS ATT |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PASS COMP |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
PASS YDS |
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
PEN YDS |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
-10 |
YDS LOST |
-12 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
83 Michigan |
7 |
6 |
7 |
16 |
36 |
|
|
93 Florida |
0 |
6 |
0 |
14 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like this
Michigan team. I was surprised they
did |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
as well as
they did against this Gator passing game. |
83 Michigan |
|
93 Florida |
Florida did
many things poorly. |
|
|
36 |
SCORE |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
409 |
TOTAL YDS |
422 |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
RUSH ATT |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
RUSH YDS |
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
RUSH AVG |
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
PASS ATT |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
PASS COMP |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
PASS YDS |
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
PEN YDS |
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
04 Virginia |
7 |
17 |
7 |
7 |
38 |
|
|
93 Ohio State |
3 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Va has a nice
offense. OSU made plays defensively |
04 Virginia |
|
93 Ohio State |
but cannot
stop the Cavs offense. OSU was sorry |
|
38 |
SCORE |
17 |
on offense,
just plain pathetic. |
|
|
|
28 |
1ST DOWNS |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
495 |
TOTAL YDS |
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
RUSH ATT |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
RUSH YDS |
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
RUSH AVG |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
PASS ATT |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
228 |
PASS YDS |
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
PEN YDS |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-3 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
REG |
|
|
03 USC |
3 |
7 |
0 |
14 |
24 |
|
|
93 Michigan |
10 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mich takes
10-3 lead with 27 yd INT ret for TD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC ties
the game at 24 with a 54 yd screen pass for a TD, |
|
|
|
off the Mich
chart (TD). USC has scored 14
unanswered, but |
|
|
|
lost a fum on
the Mich 1 in the 4th also. |
|
|
|
|
|
1 minute left |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mich gets to
the SC 23, but time expires before they can try a FGA. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OT 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 yd TD pass,
31-24 SC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 yd TD pass
on 3rd and 6, 31-31. |
|
|
|
|
|
OT 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 yd TD pass
on 3rd and goal, 38-31 Mich. |
|
|
|
|
USC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 yd TD pass, 38-38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OT 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 yd TD pass
on 3rd and 7, 2 pt pass try fails, 44-38 USC |
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 yd TD
pass, drive included recovered fumble, 2 pt pass |
|
|
|
fails, 44-44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OT 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 yd TD run, 2
pt pass fails, 50-44 Mich |
|
|
|
|
|
USC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 yd TD pass
(would have been lost fum [F+8 result]), 2 pt pass |
|
|
|
good, 52-50 USC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
03 USC |
|
93 Michigan |
Almost the
definition of even teams. USC looks
better, |
52 |
SCORE |
50 |
but Michigan
played them even. The USC defense |
|
21 |
1ST DOWNS |
28 |
played well
and consistent all game, and kept them |
502 |
TOTAL YDS |
497 |
in it. |
|
|
|
|
39 |
RUSH ATT |
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
RUSH YDS |
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
RUSH AVG |
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
PASS ATT |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PASS COMP |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
389 |
PASS YDS |
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
PEN YDS |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
-4 |
YDS LOST |
-4 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
93 UCLA |
7 |
3 |
6 |
0 |
16 |
|
|
92 Washington |
7 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Not a real
sharp game from Wash. It was
competitive, |
93 UCLA |
|
92 Washington |
and the
Huskies had their chances. UCLA plays
good |
16 |
SCORE |
10 |
pass
defense. The fumbles really hurt Wash. |
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
361 |
TOTAL YDS |
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
RUSH ATT |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
RUSH YDS |
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
RUSH AVG |
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
PASS ATT |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
PASS COMP |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
PASS YDS |
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
PEN YDS |
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
-4 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
97 Kansas St |
7 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
13 |
|
|
94 Nebraska |
10 |
0 |
10 |
0 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KS fails to
convert on a 4th and 6 from the NU 8, with 1:20 to |
|
|
|
go in the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KS stops NU
and uses their timeouts. They return
the Husker |
|
|
|
punt 22 yds,
but time runs out on them. KS got to
the |
|
|
|
NU 9 yd line. |
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
97 Kansas St |
|
94 Nebraska |
NU's defense
got 2 INTs in the 3rd qtr, and the offense |
13 |
SCORE |
20 |
converted both. That was probably the deciding |
|
20 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
factor in this
very tight game. |
|
|
|
360 |
TOTAL YDS |
283 |
It was a
war. I wish NU had run more. |
|
|
55 |
RUSH ATT |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
RUSH YDS |
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
RUSH AVG |
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
PASS ATT |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PASS COMP |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
PASS YDS |
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
-6 |
YDS LOST |
-8 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
93 West Va |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
7 |
|
|
92 Alabama |
7 |
7 |
7 |
0 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
The stats tell
the story better than the score. When |
|
93 West Va |
|
92 Alabama |
you suite up
to go onto the field against '92 Alabama, |
7 |
SCORE |
21 |
you had better
bring with you more than this. A lot |
|
8 |
1ST DOWNS |
25 |
more! WV looked terrible, even when Bama wasn't |
183 |
TOTAL YDS |
455 |
closing them down. |
|
|
|
|
36 |
RUSH ATT |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
RUSH YDS |
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
RUSH AVG |
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
PASS ATT |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
PASS COMP |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
PASS YDS |
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
PEN YDS |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-21 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
04 Texas Tech |
7 |
0 |
7 |
17 |
31 |
|
|
99 Tennessee |
3 |
10 |
17 |
3 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TT gains the
lead with a 25 yd FG with just 2:40 left to play. |
|
|
|
The Vols have
lost fumbles their last three possessions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tenn struggles
to move the ball, in all out pass mode now. |
|
|
|
They convert a
3rd and 10 with a dropback pass, |
|
|
|
|
offensive
result was green 15, def result red 5, whew! |
|
|
|
Then Tennessee
breaks an SOP for 35 yds to setup a |
|
|
|
game winning FG
attempt, which they make on the |
|
|
|
last play of
the game for the win, a 21 yarder. |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
04 Texas Tech |
|
99 Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
SCORE |
33 |
This was a
very good game. Good ol' fashioned |
|
25 |
1ST DOWNS |
27 |
run vs pass
game. All 5 INTs for Tech came via |
|
432 |
TOTAL YDS |
468 |
the Vol
defensive chart. Tenn played excellent |
|
23 |
RUSH ATT |
58 |
pass defense,
a tribute to how good the TT passing |
|
118 |
RUSH YDS |
245 |
game really
is. Meanwhile the Vols built a large |
|
5.1 |
RUSH AVG |
4.2 |
lead by
running it down Tech's throat, mostly |
|
55 |
PASS ATT |
27 |
with line
plunge plays. Good game to sit back
and |
|
33 |
PASS COMP |
16 |
watch. Tenn about gave it away with fumbles
in |
|
319 |
PASS YDS |
228 |
the 4th. |
|
|
|
|
5 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
PEN YDS |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
-5 |
YDS LOST |
-5 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
93 Notre Dame |
0 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
14 |
|
|
96 Nebraska |
0 |
0 |
0 |
21 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU caps on NDs
first mistake of the game, a fumble that |
|
|
|
helps setup
the tying TD for NU at 14 with 3.00 to go. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ND follows
with their 2nd miscue, an INT that NU returns |
|
|
|
15 yds to the
ND 5. NU runs it in from there and |
|
|
|
|
suddenly leads
21-14, 2:20 left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. ND completes several passes and moves
downfield, |
|
|
|
but
they run out of timeouts with :20 to go, the ball on the |
|
|
|
Husker 30. The Irish complete a dropback pass for |
|
|
|
|
28*, so they
have it on the NU 2 with one more play |
|
|
|
|
left. ND throws a BLP, and both them and NU have |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
a black box,
game over! |
|
|
|
93 Notre Dame |
|
96 Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
SCORE |
21 |
Fantastic
game. Incredible defensive play. Just a |
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
18 |
gridlock
defensive game. The passing game of
ND, |
447 |
TOTAL YDS |
293 |
which is very
potent, seemed to be the thing that |
|
54 |
RUSH ATT |
46 |
was taking
over the game, and leaning it the way |
|
202 |
RUSH YDS |
206 |
of the
Irish. ND broke several long runs,
while NU |
|
3.7 |
RUSH AVG |
4.5 |
was more
steady, when they could move it. I
have not |
27 |
PASS ATT |
15 |
had many games
that I have felt had more defensive |
18 |
PASS COMP |
8 |
stops. In the end, ND gives the ball away twice
and |
252 |
PASS YDS |
87 |
gives away the
game as well. Very tense ending, as |
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
ND almost
steals it back. One major thing is
that I |
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
passed with ND when
they could have sat on the |
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
ball and run
out the clock, when they threw that |
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
INT to help NU
gain the lead. ND comes across as |
|
46 |
PEN YDS |
71 |
the better
team, thanks to that strong passing game. |
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
But, NU really
made a difference with their special |
|
-7 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
teams today,
and that is not to be overlooked. |
|
|
|
|
PS - ND missed
two very make-able FGAs in the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
83 Nebraska |
0 |
21 |
7 |
0 |
28 |
|
|
93 FSU |
14 |
10 |
14 |
14 |
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU gets a 93
yd option for a TD called back for holding in the first. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
This game
actually was one of the most |
|
|
83 Nebraska |
|
93 FSU |
fun games I
have ever played. I really like
playing |
|
28 |
SCORE |
52 |
with both of
these teams, and they both have |
|
19 |
1ST DOWNS |
35 |
special
abilities. To add to that, today they
both |
|
436 |
TOTAL YDS |
646 |
showed well,
and it made for a great game. In the |
|
45 |
RUSH ATT |
42 |
end, NU just had no
way to stop or slow down the |
|
305 |
RUSH YDS |
185 |
FSU passing
game, which was incredible all game. |
|
6.8 |
RUSH AVG |
4.4 |
FSU stuffed a
few long B TD runs of the Huskers. |
|
20 |
PASS ATT |
43 |
Both teams
show how good they are. FSU shows |
|
13 |
PASS COMP |
37 |
that they are great. |
|
|
|
|
136 |
PASS YDS |
461 |
FSU has had
the advantage in this tourney so far |
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
of playing two
teams that don't defend the pass well. |
2 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
PEN YDS |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
-5 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
03 Minnesota |
0 |
14 |
3 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
83 Auburn |
7 |
7 |
14 |
14 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
03 Minnesota |
|
83 Auburn |
No surprises
in the way things end. I think Minn |
|
24 |
SCORE |
42 |
earned a lot
of respect with their offense. They
played |
25 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
with Auburn better
than a lot of teams have, but |
|
415 |
TOTAL YDS |
368 |
they don't have the
run defense to keep up with |
|
61 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
the Tigers. Also, some untimely turnovers swayed |
|
276 |
RUSH YDS |
289 |
the game
towards Auburn. The stats don't
lie. Auburn |
4.5 |
RUSH AVG |
5.6 |
really could
not stop the Gophs. I think I'd take
Minn |
21 |
PASS ATT |
13 |
in a head to
head game, because I don't like Auburn's |
13 |
PASS COMP |
5 |
chances of
stopping Minn's passing game. |
|
139 |
PASS YDS |
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
PEN YDS |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
01 Miami FL |
0 |
0 |
10 |
7 |
17 |
|
|
73 Alabama |
7 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
fumbles in a row leads to 17 pts for the Canes, marking |
|
|
|
their comeback. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bama rips a
line plunge right up the middle for 80 yds and |
|
|
|
a TD to regain
the lead at 24-17 with 3:50 left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
The Tide
defense holds and Bama wins. |
|
|
01 Miami FL |
|
73 Alabama |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
SCORE |
24 |
The '73 Tide
is still perfect for me. This game |
|
13 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
had a great
start, with both defenses making |
|
229 |
TOTAL YDS |
361 |
play after
play. It was extremely intense and had |
|
34 |
RUSH ATT |
57 |
a great
atmosphere. Then in the 3rd qtr
Bama |
|
103 |
RUSH YDS |
248 |
began their
fumbling problems and the game broke |
3.0 |
RUSH AVG |
4.4 |
down in
intensity and quality. Though it was
now |
|
39 |
PASS ATT |
13 |
tied. Overall Bama's D really did the job and
brings |
14 |
PASS COMP |
8 |
it home. Miami did plenty to hurt themselves with |
|
126 |
PASS YDS |
113 |
some poor passing,
but Alabama's defense really |
|
4 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
shut down the
Canes. Nice job by the Bama offense |
0 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
against this
great defense as well. Pretty
strong |
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
statement Bama makes in
winning this one and |
|
9 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
looking so strong. |
|
|
|
|
74 |
PEN YDS |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
73 Notre Dame |
3 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
83 Michigan |
3 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ND cuts the
lead to 2 with 5:30 to go in the game, with a 31 yd dropback. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of the
best finishes I have ever had, because both teams made |
|
|
|
plays and the
momentum went back and forth. ND
converts a 4th and 2 |
|
|
on a BLP that
got a B result and went 24 yds, |
|
|
|
|
with a little
over a minute left with a pass, putting them into FG range. |
|
|
Then they
would have moved closer, but Mich blitzed and gets the QT. |
|
|
The QT roll was a F-4, but
ND recovered. |
|
|
|
|
ND runs out of
timeouts, and completes a 6 yd pass, (good defense |
|
|
|
again) to get
to the Michigan 13. The 30 yd FG has a
NG result, |
|
|
|
and 83
Michigan has beaten the giants. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
73 Notre Dame |
|
83 Michigan |
This one was a
classic. It helps that I like the eras |
|
10 |
SCORE |
12 |
both these
teams played in, and that I like a run |
|
15 |
1ST DOWNS |
12 |
heavy
defensive game. Michigan played very
well. |
315 |
TOTAL YDS |
224 |
Michigan
played a solid game in the special teams |
|
52 |
RUSH ATT |
55 |
dept. today,
though they did miss a coupld of long |
|
209 |
RUSH YDS |
209 |
range
FGAs. ND has one of the best defenses
of all |
|
4.0 |
RUSH AVG |
3.8 |
the charts, but
as I looked at them today, I thought |
|
19 |
PASS ATT |
9 |
maybe the best
thing to do is just run up the middle. |
7 |
PASS COMP |
2 |
They are too
dangerous everywhere else. That helps |
112 |
PASS YDS |
15 |
Michigan,
because that is mainly what I do with them, |
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
and they have
a great line plunge. Michigan played |
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
a clean game,
which they do very well, and that is |
|
3 |
TURNOVERS |
0 |
important
against this Irish team. The ND
offense left |
4 |
PENALTIES |
6 |
all the work
up to their defense for too long. They |
|
30 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
finally got
going a little, but that was just too late. |
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
Fantastic
ending. Thrilling really. Most great endings |
-6 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
involve (for
me) one team doing this or that, usually |
|
|
|
something
great. In this one, both teams made
great |
|
|
|
plays swinging the
momentum back and forth, and |
|
|
|
|
still allowing
for that last play of the game FGA. |
|
|
|
|
It was a great
game. 83 Michigan continues in the |
|
|
|
|
tourney. By the way, Mich missed a PAT, so the |
|
|
|
|
FG in the end
for ND had different meaning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
04 Virginia |
21 |
0 |
17 |
13 |
51 |
|
|
03 USC |
7 |
14 |
7 |
21 |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UVA jumps on
USC, scoring easily on their first possession, |
|
|
|
then returning
a punt 72 yds for a TD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC replies
with an 88 yd TD pass via the dropback |
|
|
|
|
but it was off
the Va chart (TD). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Va rips a 60
yd TD run in the 3rd to regain the lead 28-21. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Va turns
another long KOR into 3 points with 4 minutes |
|
|
|
to go in the
game, and leads 48-42. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USC drives
methodically down the field, includes a screen pass |
|
|
|
that goes for
36, and scores a go ahead TD (49-48) with |
|
|
|
now 1:20 left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yet another
very short KO from USC, and Va easily moves |
|
|
|
into FG range,
making a 39 yd FG, :10 left. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Crazy
game. Apparently the Cav offense is
for |
|
04 Virginia |
|
03 USC |
real, doing
this twice in a row. They pass and run |
|
51 |
SCORE |
49 |
very
well. Two main things stuck out to
me. One, |
|
23 |
1ST DOWNS |
21 |
USC kickoff coverage
(kickoff distance) was |
|
480 |
TOTAL YDS |
532 |
atrocious. Completely pathetic. Couple that with |
|
37 |
RUSH ATT |
38 |
the fact that
Va had very long KO returns ALL game |
197 |
RUSH YDS |
167 |
long, and Va
often had the short field. This also
added |
5.3 |
RUSH AVG |
4.4 |
to the
scoring. USC's punter had a fabulous
game, |
|
40 |
PASS ATT |
37 |
even though he
didn't punt much, he had multiple |
|
25 |
PASS COMP |
27 |
50+ yarders
that pinned Va deep. Va continues the |
|
284 |
PASS YDS |
379 |
magic, and 83
Michigan may have caught a break |
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
in the bracket. |
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
PEN YDS |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
-1 |
YDS LOST |
-14 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
93 UCLA |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
94 Nebraska |
0 |
10 |
0 |
14 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Good, solid
win for NU, but niether team was |
|
93 UCLA |
|
94 Nebraska |
impressive. Both offenses struggled. UCLA was |
|
0 |
SCORE |
24 |
expected to do
much better in their passing game, |
|
16 |
1ST DOWNS |
19 |
but they were dull
overall. NU helped the UCLA |
|
242 |
TOTAL YDS |
416 |
INT total be
so high. NU passed the ball very well. |
|
40 |
RUSH ATT |
56 |
Another steady
playing win for '94 NU. |
|
|
105 |
RUSH YDS |
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
RUSH AVG |
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
PASS ATT |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
PASS YDS |
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PEN YDS |
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
-13 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
92 Alabama |
7 |
13 |
0 |
10 |
30 |
|
|
99 Tennessee |
3 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Typical game
for Bama. They did nicely and their |
|
92 Alabama |
|
99 Tennessee |
D brings it
home. Tenn played evenly with them |
|
30 |
SCORE |
13 |
for the first
half, but got FGs when Bama was getting |
18 |
1ST DOWNS |
10 |
TDs, and could
not keep up. |
|
|
|
389 |
TOTAL YDS |
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
RUSH ATT |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
RUSH YDS |
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
RUSH AVG |
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
PASS ATT |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
PASS COMP |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
PASS YDS |
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
PEN YDS |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
-3 |
YDS LOST |
-12 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
96 Nebraska |
0 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
93 FSU |
10 |
6 |
10 |
7 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
96 Nebraska |
|
93 FSU |
NU cannot hold onto
the beast that is 93 FSU. |
|
10 |
SCORE |
33 |
FSU kept it to
the ground game a little more, playing |
11 |
1ST DOWNS |
26 |
away from the INT
prone NU pass D. And working |
|
173 |
TOTAL YDS |
502 |
into the
Husker's hands, still NU did not give FSU |
|
41 |
RUSH ATT |
58 |
any
competition. FSU closed out the
Nebraska running |
129 |
RUSH YDS |
276 |
game all day
long. FSU is so impressive. |
|
|
3.1 |
RUSH AVG |
4.8 |
FSU killed NU
with the draw play all game. This was |
13 |
PASS ATT |
29 |
part of a 3rd
down conversion domination for FSU |
|
5 |
PASS COMP |
19 |
that was
probably the biggest factor in the game. |
|
44 |
PASS YDS |
230 |
They converted
countless 3rd and 9 or 10s. |
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
PEN YDS |
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-4 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
83 Auburn |
0 |
3 |
7 |
10 |
20 |
|
|
73 Alabama |
14 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The opening
score of the game is Bama, a 93 yd PR. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bama goes up 24-10
near the end of the 3rd with a |
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
screen pass
(offensive TD result) that goes 53 yds. |
|
83 Auburn |
|
73 Alabama |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
SCORE |
27 |
The game ends
ugly, as Auburn is forced to pass, |
|
21 |
1ST DOWNS |
12 |
and they throw 3
straight INTs, not knowing they |
|
396 |
TOTAL YDS |
287 |
would get
three chances at it. |
|
|
|
60 |
RUSH ATT |
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
346 |
RUSH YDS |
232 |
The INTs for
Auburn were ridiculous, but most of them |
5.8 |
RUSH AVG |
4.1 |
came off the
Bama chart. For the game, as the stats |
16 |
PASS ATT |
4 |
indicate,
Auburn looked more dominant, but Bama |
|
5 |
PASS COMP |
3 |
put it
together FAR better than the Tigers.
Auburn |
|
50 |
PASS YDS |
55 |
blew multiple
chances to add points, when Alabama |
6 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
made the most
of their opps. The INTs in the end |
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
3 |
tainted what
was a pretty intense and good game. |
|
8 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
The Auburn
running game is good enough to control |
3 |
PENALTIES |
8 |
things in this
matchup, but too many other things |
|
25 |
PEN YDS |
50 |
went wrong for
Auburn. The 93 yd punt return as |
|
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
the game's
first score stands out as the difference |
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
maker for Alabama. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
83 Michigan |
14 |
3 |
0 |
14 |
31 |
|
|
04 Virginia |
7 |
7 |
10 |
3 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mich KOR for
100 yds and TD in the 1st |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Va moved it
well in the waning moments of the game, but |
|
|
|
then went dry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They end the
day with 3 straight inc passes on the Mich 17. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
An even game
all day. Mich comes out with it, |
|
83 Michigan |
|
04 Virginia |
pounding away
at inside runs on a 5 minute drive |
|
31 |
SCORE |
27 |
to take the
lead late in the 4th. Then Va just
could |
|
19 |
1ST DOWNS |
25 |
not complete a
pass in the very end. Mich did
not |
|
320 |
TOTAL YDS |
397 |
look as sharp
as they have been, but turned to an |
|
63 |
RUSH ATT |
38 |
all out grind
it out running game to push it through. |
|
307 |
RUSH YDS |
151 |
Mich was a
little more sloppy, too, than they have |
|
4.9 |
RUSH AVG |
4.0 |
been. But, the numbers for them land where they |
|
12 |
PASS ATT |
39 |
have. They are a real machine. It was obvious |
|
2 |
PASS COMP |
23 |
playing this
game that both teams cannot play at the |
13 |
PASS YDS |
246 |
level of the
rest in this tourney left at this point. |
|
2 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
Va played well, and even
made some plays |
|
1 |
FUM LOST |
0 |
defensively. They showed today that they can move |
3 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
the chains
slowly and methodically, as well as lighting |
4 |
PENALTIES |
4 |
it up
offensively. They had a great
tournament, and |
19 |
PEN YDS |
20 |
proved to be
very solid and well rounded offensively. |
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
I think Va would
consistently play well against |
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
anybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
94 Nebraska |
21 |
7 |
0 |
7 |
35 |
|
|
92 Alabama |
0 |
0 |
3 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU hits a 72
yd dropback for a TD (roll 29 TD) to go up 14-0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU runs a punt
back 64 yds for a TD to go up 21 zip, :30 left in the 1st |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Obviously the
run defenses were stiff and ruled, |
|
94 Nebraska |
|
92 Alabama |
and both teams
had success passing. If NU plays |
|
35 |
SCORE |
10 |
this well in
the rest of their games, there is no |
|
14 |
1ST DOWNS |
15 |
reason for the
other team to show. NU got several |
|
339 |
TOTAL YDS |
340 |
big plays,
that are not luck of the roll, and cruises |
|
58 |
RUSH ATT |
36 |
over a great
team. NU shows they can play some |
|
184 |
RUSH YDS |
69 |
blame run
defense, too! Very impressive and a
good |
3.2 |
RUSH AVG |
1.9 |
game. NU actually ran the ball pretty well at
times, |
13 |
PASS ATT |
34 |
but there were
plenty of large red numbers for Bama |
8 |
PASS COMP |
17 |
that made the stats not look
so good. |
|
|
155 |
PASS YDS |
277 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
TURNOVERS |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
PEN YDS |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
SACKED |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
-6 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
93 FSU |
0 |
3 |
13 |
7 |
23 |
|
|
73 Alabama |
10 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bama catches
the first break, returning a fumble 41 yds for a TD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Not hard to
imagine that this one was evenly matched. |
93 FSU |
|
73 Alabama |
FSU seemed to
be giving Bama a break for a while, |
23 |
SCORE |
16 |
as they had
terrible turnover problems the entire |
|
26 |
1ST DOWNS |
14 |
first
half. That was uncharacteristic. FSU had their |
|
385 |
TOTAL YDS |
256 |
hands full, as the
Bama defense shut down their |
|
46 |
RUSH ATT |
48 |
potent offense
early. Bama did as they usually
do, |
|
231 |
RUSH YDS |
190 |
relying on the
big play for their points. In the 2nd |
|
5.0 |
RUSH AVG |
4.0 |
half, FSU
stopped the turnovers and ran away with |
|
35 |
PASS ATT |
13 |
the game. Bama posed a more formidable challenge |
18 |
PASS COMP |
5 |
than others
have to this FSU team. But, in the end |
|
162 |
PASS YDS |
66 |
Alabama still
had no realistic chance to pull it out. |
|
1 |
INT THROWN |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
PENALTIES |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
PEN YDS |
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
SACKED |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
-8 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
83 Michigan |
0 |
12 |
3 |
14 |
29 |
|
|
94 Nebraska |
10 |
9 |
7 |
10 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU
is driving about to score before the half, but Mich INTs a pass, then Mich
hits a |
|
|
56 yd TD BLP
pass before the half. Both teams have
missed |
|
|
|
a PAT in this
qtr. 16-12 NU. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU returns the
ensuing KO from above for 59 yds, that sets up |
|
|
|
a 37 yd FG on
the last play of the first half, 19-12 NU. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NU seemingly
ices the game with a 64 yd line plunge for |
|
|
|
a TD with 2:30
to go, 36-22 Huskers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
Mich has been
averaging about 300 yds rushing, |
|
83 Michigan |
|
94 Nebraska |
at about 5 yds
per carry vs. everybody. Even with |
|
29 |
SCORE |
36 |
a long run or
two, the stats show that today went |
|
19 |
1ST DOWNS |
16 |
differently
for Mich. Few teams, if any, have had |
|
389 |
TOTAL YDS |
419 |
success
stopping the Michigan line plunge and its |
|
60 |
RUSH ATT |
46 |
consistency. NU defended it well, as they are quite |
|
256 |
RUSH YDS |
307 |
equipped to
do. The Huskers played well, but so |
|
4.3 |
RUSH AVG |
6.7 |
did
Michigan. And, even though the game
was never |
14 |
PASS ATT |
19 |
really
controlled by Michigan, they earned respect in |
8 |
PASS COMP |
10 |
my book
today. They don't look like the kind
of team |
133 |
PASS YDS |
112 |
that should
play with these powerhouses, but they |
|
0 |
INT THROWN |
1 |
prove to play
clean and steady, and are very |
|
0 |
FUM LOST |
2 |
respectable. The Huskers got big returns all game |
|
0 |
TURNOVERS |
3 |
long, and got
some big plays to mesh with an overall |
7 |
PENALTIES |
7 |
pretty good
day. Extremely good and fun game, and |
35 |
PEN YDS |
85 |
action was
hectic towards the end of the game, as it |
0 |
SACKED |
0 |
took a lot to finally put
away Michigan. |
|
|
0 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
Great matchup
for the title! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title Game |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mega 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
FINAL |
|
|
93 FSU |
7 |
14 |
0 |
14 |
35 |
|
|
94 Nebraska |
14 |
17 |
9 |
0 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSU rips a 66
yd end run to close to 40-35 with |
|
|
|
|
6:00 left in the game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSU fails on a
4th and 7 at the NU 29. This set of |
|
|
|
|
downs included
a fatal OFF 10. |
|
|
|
Visitor |
|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
93 FSU |
|
94 Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
SCORE |
40 |
The first half
the game was a slug-fest. These teams |
21 |
1ST DOWNS |
20 |
traded blows
like heavywieght boxers. The amazing |
506 |
TOTAL YDS |
402 |
thing, as the
stats show, is that NU passed the ball |
|
28 |
RUSH ATT |
52 |
to victory
today! Really, honestly, I did not set
them |
220 |
RUSH YDS |
143 |
up to pass
this much, and they passed some out |
|
7.9 |
RUSH AVG |
2.8 |
of the option
play call. But, what tremendous
success |
42 |
PASS ATT |
24 |
the Huskers
had throwing the ball, against a very good |
29 |
PASS COMP |
20 |
defense. If you look at the charts, it appears
FSU |
|
301 |
PASS YDS |
259 |
should be able
to win via their passing game vs this |
2 |
INT THROWN |
0 |
NU pass
D. In the 3rd qtr, things fell apart
for FSU, |
|
2 |
FUM LOST |
1 |
as they were
bit by turnovers and NU kept things |
|
4 |
TURNOVERS |
1 |
going. In the 4th, FSU regained themselves |
|
8 |
PENALTIES |
5 |
and played their
best football, but they had a long |
|
70 |
PEN YDS |
30 |
way to come
back. NU, in the 4th, could not move
the |
2 |
SACKED |
0 |
chains, but
did run out some clock and didn't turn |
|
-15 |
YDS LOST |
0 |
the ball
over. Good game overall. Surprised that it |
|
|
|
was really
completely controlled by offenses.
And, the |
|
|
|
story of the
game was the passing attack that came through |
|
|
|
today for
Nebraska. Of note is that NU also was
stuck in |
|
|
|
3rd and long
much of the day, with FSU defending the |
|
|
|
run well, so
NU had some additional passing caused by |
|
|
|
that as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|